EASEL: Evaluation of Algorithmic Skills in an Environment Learning
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32920
EASEL: Evaluation of Algorithmic Skills in an Environment Learning

Authors: A. Bey, T. Bensebaa, H. Benselem


This paper attempts to explore a new method to improve the teaching of algorithmic for beginners. It is well known that algorithmic is a difficult field to teach for teacher and complex to assimilate for learner. These difficulties are due to intrinsic characteristics of this field and to the manner that teachers (the majority) apprehend its bases. However, in a Technology Enhanced Learning environment (TEL), assessment, which is important and indispensable, is the most delicate phase to implement, for all problems that generate (noise...). Our objective registers in the confluence of these two axes. For this purpose, EASEL focused essentially to elaborate an assessment approach of algorithmic competences in a TEL environment. This approach consists in modeling an algorithmic solution according to basic and elementary operations which let learner draw his/her own step with all autonomy and independently to any programming language. This approach assures a trilateral assessment: summative, formative and diagnostic assessment.

Keywords: Algorithmic, assessment of competences, Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL).

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1078464

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1419


[1] Tomasz M├╝ldner and Elhadi Shakshuki, 2003. Teaching Student to Implement Algorithms. Jodrey School of Computer Science, Acadia University. TR-2003-03 November, 2003.
[2] Kaasboll, J.,2002. Learning Programming. University of Oslo.
[3] Caignaert C, 1988. ├ëtude de l-évolution des methods d-apprentissage et de programmation. Le bulletin de l-EPI N┬░50, Juin 1988.
[4] Stuart Garner, 2003. "Where Parallels Intersect" Learning Resources and Tools to Aid Novices Learn Programming. Informing Science InSITE. Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
[5] Ben-Ari M.,1998. Constructivism in Computer Science Education. ACM IGCSE Bulletin, 30(1): pp.257-261.
[6] Dede, C., Salzman, M. C., Loftin, R. B., & Sprague, D. 1999. Multisensory immersion as a modelling environment for learning complex scientific concepts. In N. Roberts,W. Feurzeig, & B. Hunter (Eds.), Computer modelling and simulation in science education (pp. 282-319). New York: Springer-Verlag.
[7] Katai, Z., Juhasz, K., & Adorjani, A. K . 2008. On the role of senses in education. Computers & Education. 51(4), 1707-1717. Student performance in traditional mode and online mode of learning.
[8] Guibert, N., Guittet, L., & Girard, P. 2005. Initiation ├á la Programmation « par l-exemple »: concepts, environnement, et étude d-utilité. Acte de colloque EIAH-05, Montpellier: 25-27 Mai, 461-466.
[9] Lorrie A. Shepard, 2000. The Role of Classroom Assessment in Teaching and Learning. CSE Technical Report 517 CRESST. University of Colorado at Boulder.
[10] Guillaume Durand, 2006. Vers une scénarisation de l-évaluation en EIAH. L-évaluation comme activité scénarisable dans un dispositif de scénarisation pédagogique. RJC-EIAH-2006.