Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Self-adaptation of Ontologies to Folksonomies in Semantic Web

Authors: Francisco Echarte, José Javier Astrain, Alberto Córdoba, Jesús Villadangos

Abstract:

Ontologies and tagging systems are two different ways to organize the knowledge present in the current Web. In this paper we propose a simple method to model folksonomies, as tagging systems, with ontologies. We show the scalability of the method using real data sets. The modeling method is composed of a generic ontology that represents any folksonomy and an algorithm to transform the information contained in folksonomies to the generic ontology. The method allows representing folksonomies at any instant of time.

Keywords: Folksonomies, ontologies, OWL, semantic web.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1078120

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1285

References:


[1] Vander Wal. T.: Folksonomy. http://vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html, February 2 (2007)
[2] Gruber, T. A.: Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199--220 (1993)
[3] G├│mez-Pérez, A, Fern├índez-L├│pez, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering, London, Springer-Verlag (2003)
[4] Golder, S.A., Huberman, B.A.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science 32, 2, 198--208 (2005)
[5] Brickley D. and Guha, R.V.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation 10 February (2004)
[6] Begelman, G., Keller P., Smadja, F.: Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space. WWW2006, May 22- 26 (2006) Edinburgh, U.K.
[7] Mathes, A. Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Computer Mediated Communication, Dec (2004)
[8] Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.L.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. W3C Recommendation 10 February (2004)
[9] Dean, M. and Schreiber, G.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation 10 February (2004)
[10] Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May (2001)
[11] Specia, L., Motta, E.: Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web. In: European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007), The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. LNCS 4519, pp. 503ÔÇö517, Springer. Heidelberg (2007)
[12] Abbasi I R, Staab S., Cimiano P: Organizing Resources on Tagging Systems using T-ORG. In: Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0, workshop at European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007), Heidelberg (2007)
[13] Robustai. http://robustai.net/folksonomy/Tag-ontology.html
[14] tagont. http://code.google.com/p/tagont/
[15] Tag ontology design. http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/tags/
[16] NEPOMUK. Annotation ontology specification. http://www.www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nao/
[17] Passant, A.: Using Ontologies to Strengthen Folksonomies and Enrich Information Retrieval in Weblogs. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWM. March (2007)
[18] Gruber, T.: Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges. AIS SIGSEMIS Bulletin, 2(3&4) (2005)
[19] Protégé, http://protege.stanford.edu/
[20] Drummond, N., Rector, A., Stevens, R., Moulton, G., Horridge, M., Wang, H.H., Seidenberg, J.: Putting OWL in Order: Patterns for Sequences in OWL. OWLed (2006)
[21] Prud'hommeaux, E., Seaborne A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Working Draft 4 October (2006)
[22] Damianos, L. E., Cuomo, D., Griffith, J., Hirst, D. M., Smallwood, J.: Exploring the Adoption, Utility, and Social Influences of Social Bookmarking in a Corporate Environment. In 40th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (2007)
[23] Brooks, C.H. and Montanez, N.: Improved Annotation of the Blogosphere via Autotagging and Hierarchical Clustering. WWW 2006, May 23--2 (2006), Edinburgh, UK.
[24] Sdb - jena. http://jena.hpl.hp.com/wiki/sdb