Reducing the Number of Constraints in Non Safe Petri Net
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Reducing the Number of Constraints in Non Safe Petri Net

Authors: M. Zareiee, A. Dideban

Abstract:

This paper addresses the problem of forbidden states in non safe Petri Nets. In the system, for preventing it from entering the forbidden states, some linear constraints can be assigned to them. Then these constraints can be enforced on the system using control places. But when the number of constraints in the system is large, a large number of control places must be added to the model of system. This concept complicates the model of system. There are some methods for reducing the number of constraints in safe Petri Nets. But there is no a systematic method for non safe Petri Nets. In this paper we propose a method for reducing the number of constraints in non safe Petri Nets which is based on solving an integer linear programming problem.

Keywords: discrete event system, Supervisory control, Petri Net, Constraint

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1077365

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1319

References:


[1] P. Ramadge, W. Wonham, "Modular feedback logic for discrete event systems," SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, 1987, 25(5), 1202-1218.
[2] P. Ramadge, W. Wonham, "The control of discrete event systems," Dynamics of discrete event systems
[Special issue]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1989, 77(1), 81-98.
[3] A. Giua, Petri Nets as Discrete Event Models for Supervisory Control. Ph.D. Thesis, 1992.
[4] J. Moody, P. Antsaklis, "Petri net supervisor for DES with uncontrollable and unobservable transition," IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 2000, 45(3): 462-476.
[5] B. Krogh, L. Holloway, "Synthesis of feedback control logic for discrete manufacturing systems," Automatica, 1991, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 641-651.
[6] L. Holloway, X. Guan, and L. Zhang, "A Generalisation of state avoidance Policies for Controlled Petri Nets," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1996, AC-41, 6, 804- 816.
[7] Dideban, A., & Alla, H. (2006). Solving the problem of forbidden states by feedback control logical synthesis. The 32nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Paris, FRANCE.
[8] A. Ghaffari, N. Rezg, and X. Xie, "Design of live and maximally permissive petri net controller using the theory of regions," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2003, 19(1).
[9] K. Yamalidou, J. Moody, M. Lemmon, and P. Antsaklis, "Feedback control of petri nets based on place invariants," Automatica, 1996, 32(1), 15-28.
[10] A. Giua, F. DiCesare, M. Silva, Generalized Mutual Exclusion Constraints on Nets with Uncontrollable Transitions. In Proc. IEEE int. conf. on systems, man, and cybernetics, 1992, pp. 974-799.
[11] A. Dideban, and H. Alla, "From forbidden state to linear constraints for the optimal supervisory control," Control Engineering and applied Informaics (CEAI), 2005, 7(3), 48-55.
[12] A. Dideban, and H. Alla, "Reduction of Constraints for Controller Synthesis based on Safe Petri Nets," Automatica, 2008, 44(7): 1697- 1706.
[13] A. Dideban, M. Zareiee, and H. Alla, Controller synthesis with very simplified linear constraints in PN model. The 2nd IFAC workshop on Depebdable Control of Discrete Systems, June 10-12, Bari, Italy, 2009, 265-270.
[14] R. Kumar, L. Holloway, "Supervisory control of deterministic Petri nets with regular specification languages," IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 1996 41(2):245-249.