Assesing Extension of Meeting System Performance in Information Technology in Defense and Aerospace Project

Authors: Hakan Gürkan, Ahmet Denker

Abstract:

The Ministry of Defense (MoD) spends hundreds of millions of dollars on software to support its infrastructure, operate its weapons and provide command, control, communications, computing, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) functions. These and other all new advanced systems have a common critical component is information technology. Defense and Aerospace environment is continuously striving to keep up with increasingly sophisticated Information Technology (IT) in order to remain effective in today-s dynamic and unpredictable threat environment. This makes it one of the largest and fastest growing expenses of Defense. Hundreds of millions of dollars spent a year on IT projects. But, too many of those millions are wasted on costly mistakes. Systems that do not work properly, new components that are not compatible with old once, trendily new applications that do not really satisfy defense needs or lost though poorly managed contracts. This paper investigates and compiles the effective strategies that aim to end exasperation with low returns and high cost of Information Technology Acquisition for defense; it tries to show how to maximize value while reducing time and expenditure.

Keywords: Iterative Process, Acquisition Management, Project management, Software Economics, Requirement analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1077287

References:

[1] IEEE/EIA 12207 Standard for Information Technology - Software Life Cycle Processes or relevant International Standardization Organization (ISO) standards. They define a set of recommended development activities and documentation alternatives for software intensive systems.
[2] The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Capability Maturity Model (CMM) for software development - Feb., 1993.
[3] Barrow, Patrick D. M. and Mayhew, Pam J. "Investigating principles of stakeholder evaluation in a modern IS development approach." Journal of Systems and Software 52, Iss. 2,3 (June 1, 2000): 95-103.
[4] PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) First Edition Version 1.0 June 2003.
[5] Pfleeger, Shari Lawrence, Software Engineering: Theory and Practice, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2001.
[6] Hall, Elaine, M. Managing Risk: Methods for Software System Development, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1998.
[7] Housel, Thomas J. and Bell, Arthur H. Measuring and Managing Knowledge. McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2001.
[8] Software Project Survival Guide, Requirements Development, Steven C. McConnell, http://www.stevemcconnell.com/sgreq.htm
[9] Ralph R. Young, Effective Requirements Practices, pp82-83, Addison- Wesley, 2001
[10] Malhotra, Yogesh. "Knowledge Management for e-Business Performance." Information Strategy: The Executives Journal (2000).
[11] PBPG, 2002 Impronova AB, " IT Procurement Best Practice Guide", 2002.
[12] Joyce Fortune , Diana White "Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model" International Journal of Project Management,2005
[13] Ahmet Denker, Hakan G├╝rkan "Iterative Way to Acquire Information Technology For Defense and Aerospace", 7th International Conference on Enformatika, Systems Sciences and Engineering,2005.