Improving Air Temperature Prediction with Artificial Neural Networks

Authors: Brian A. Smith, Ronald W. McClendon, Gerrit Hoogenboom

Abstract:

The mitigation of crop loss due to damaging freezes requires accurate air temperature prediction models. Previous work established that the Ward-style artificial neural network (ANN) is a suitable tool for developing such models. The current research focused on developing ANN models with reduced average prediction error by increasing the number of distinct observations used in training, adding additional input terms that describe the date of an observation, increasing the duration of prior weather data included in each observation, and reexamining the number of hidden nodes used in the network. Models were created to predict air temperature at hourly intervals from one to 12 hours ahead. Each ANN model, consisting of a network architecture and set of associated parameters, was evaluated by instantiating and training 30 networks and calculating the mean absolute error (MAE) of the resulting networks for some set of input patterns. The inclusion of seasonal input terms, up to 24 hours of prior weather information, and a larger number of processing nodes were some of the improvements that reduced average prediction error compared to previous research across all horizons. For example, the four-hour MAE of 1.40°C was 0.20°C, or 12.5%, less than the previous model. Prediction MAEs eight and 12 hours ahead improved by 0.17°C and 0.16°C, respectively, improvements of 7.4% and 5.9% over the existing model at these horizons. Networks instantiating the same model but with different initial random weights often led to different prediction errors. These results strongly suggest that ANN model developers should consider instantiating and training multiple networks with different initial weights to establish preferred model parameters.

Keywords: Decision support systems, frost protection, fruit, time-series prediction, weather modeling

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1075076

References:

[1] W. R. Okie, G. L. Reighard, W. C. Newall, Jr., C. J. Graham, D. J. Werner, A. Powell, G. Krewer, and T. G. Beckman, "Spring freeze damage to the 1996 peach and nectarine crop in the southeastern United States," HortTechnology, vol. 8, pp. 381-386, 1998.
[2] G. Hoogenboom, "The Georgia automated environmental monitoring network," in Preprints of the 24th Conference On Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, 2000, pp. 24-25.
[3] A. Jain, R. W. McClendon, G. Hoogenboom, and R. Ramyaa, "Prediction of frost for fruit protection using artificial neural networks," American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, 2003, ASAE Paper 03-3075.
[4] A. Jain, "Frost prediction using artificial neural networks: A temperature prediction approach," M.S. thesis, Artificial Intelligence Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 2003.
[5] Ramyaa, "Frost prediction using artificial neural networks: A classification approach," M.S. thesis, Artificial Intelligence Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 2004.
[6] B. R. Temeyer, W. A. Gallus, Jr., K. A. Jungbluth, D. Burkheimer, and D. McCauley, "Using an artificial neural network to predict parameters for frost deposition on Iowa bridgeways," in Proceedings of the 2003 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 2003.
[7] S. Haykin, Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998, pp. 161-175.
[8] Manual of NeuroShell 2, Ward Systems Group, Frederick, MD, 1993.
[9] F. Salehi,, R. Lacroix, and K. M. Wade, "Effects of learning parameters and data presentation on the performance of backpropagation networks for milk yield prediction," Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 41, pp. 253- 259, 1998.