Corporate Social Responsibility and Values in Innovation Management

Authors: J. Maksimainen, P. Saariluoma, P. Jokivuori

Abstract:

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) viewpoint have challenged the traditional perception to understand corporations position. Production- and managerial-centred views are expanding towards reference group-centred policies. Consequently, the significance of new kind of knowledge has emerged. In addition to management of the organisation, the idea of CSR emphasises the importance to recognise the value-expectations of operational environment. It is know that management is often well-aware of corporate social responsibilities, but it is less clear how well these high level goals are understood in practical product design and development work. In this study, the apprehension above proved to be real to some degree. While management was very aware of CSR it was less familiar to designers. The outcome shows that it is essential to raise ethical values and issues higher in corporate communication, if it is wished that they materialize also in products.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility, management, engineering, values.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1074942

References:

[1] Burke, L. and Logsdon, J. "How corporate social responsibility pays off," in Long range planning, Vol. 29, pp. 495-502, 1996.
[2] Hollander, J. "What matters most: Corporate values and social responsibility," in California management review, Vol. 46, pp. 111-119, 2004.
[3] McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. "Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective," in Academy of management journal, Vol. 26, pp. 117-127, 2001.
[4] Porter, M. and Kramer, M. "Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility" in Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, pp. 78-92, 2006.
[5] Carroll, A. B. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Bussiness and society, 1999, 38, 268-295
[6] S. H. Schwartz and W. Bilsky, "Toward a universal psychological structure of human values," in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vo. 53, pp. 550-562, 1987.
[7] S. H. Schwartz and W. Bilsky, "Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications," in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 58, pp. 878-891, 1990.
[8] M. Rokeach, The nature of human values, New York: Free Press, 1973.
[9] G. Hofstede, "Culture-s consequences - International differences in work-related values," in Cross-cultural research and methodology series, Vol. 5, London: Sage, 1980.
[10] S. H. Schwartz, "Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries," in Advances in experimental social psychology, M. P. Zanna, Ed. New York: Academic Press, Vol. 25, pp. 1-65, 1992.
[11] S. H. Schwartz, "Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values?" in Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50, pp. 19-45, 1994.
[12] C. Kluckhohn, "Value and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification," in Toward a general theory of action, T. Parsons and E. Shills (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.
[13] E. Allardt, Sosiologia 1. 2nd ed. Juva: WSOY 1985(1983).