Masonry CSEB Building Models under Shaketable Testing-An Experimental Study
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Masonry CSEB Building Models under Shaketable Testing-An Experimental Study

Authors: Lakshmi Keshav, V. G. Srisanthi

Abstract:

In this experimental investigation shake table tests were conducted on two reduced models that represent normal single room building constructed by Compressed Stabilized Earth Block (CSEB) from locally available soil. One model was constructed with earthquake resisting features (EQRF) having sill band, lintel band and vertical bands to control the building vibration and another one was without Earthquake Resisting Features. To examine the seismic capacity of the models particularly when it is subjected to long-period ground motion by large amplitude by many cycles of repeated loading, the test specimen was shaken repeatedly until the failure. The test results from Hi-end Data Acquisition system show that model with EQRF behave better than without EQRF. This modified masonry model with new material combined with new bands is used to improve the behavior of masonry building.

Keywords: Earth Quake Resisting Features, Compressed Stabilized Earth Blocks, Masonry structures, Shake table testing, Horizontal and vertical bands.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1074603

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2683

References:


[1] Clough RW, GulkanP and Mayes RL (1979), "Shaking Table Study of Single Storey Masonry Houses-Vol 3: Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations," Report No. UCB/EERC-79/25, EERC, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
[2] Krishna J and Chandra B (1965), "Strengthening of Brick Buildings Against Earthquake Forces," Third World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand.
[3] Mengi Y, Sucuolu H and McNiven HD (1984), "A Linear Mathematical Mode for the Seismic In-plane Behaviour of Brick Masonry Walls, Part 1: Theoretical Considerations," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 12(3): 313-326..
[4] Murty CVR, Dayal U, Arlekar JN, Chaubey SK and Jain SK (2001), "Preliminary Field Report on Gujarat Earthquake," The Indian Concrete Journal, The ACC Limited, Thane, 75(3): 181-190. IS 3495-1976 Part-I 1976, Code of Practice for Preparation and Use of masonry Mortars, First Revision, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[5] Seible F, Priestley JN and Kurkchubasche AG (1994), "Seismic Response of Full-Scale Five-Storey Reinforced Masonry Building," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 120: 925-946.
[6] Sommers P (1996), "Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994: Reconnaissance Report, Volume 2 - Unreinforced Masonry Buildings," Earthquake Spectra, EERI, 11: 195-217.
[7] Qamaruddin M, Arya AS and Chandra B (1978), "Experimental Evaluation of Seismic Strengthening Methods of Brick Building," Sixth Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee
[8] IS: 13828-1993 (1993), Improving Earthquake Resistance of Low Strength Masonry Buildings-Guidelines, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[9] Shea GH (1993), "Erzincan, Turkey Earthquake of March 13, 1992: Reconnaissance Report Earthquake Spectra EERI
[10] Tomazevic M (1999), Earthquake Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings,Imperial College Press