Modeling of a Stewart Platform for Analyzing One Directional Dynamics for Spacecraft Docking Operations
Authors: Leonardo Herrera, Shield B. Lin, Stephen J. Montgomery-Smith, Ziraguen O. Williams
Abstract:
A one-directional dynamic model of a Stewart Platform was developed to assist NASA in analyzing the dynamic response in spacecraft docking operations. A simplified mechanical drawing was created, capturing the physical structure's main features. A simplified schematic diagram was developed into a lumped mass model from the mechanical drawing. Three differential equations were derived according to the schematic diagram. A Simulink diagram was created using MATLAB to represent the three equations. System parameters, including spring constants and masses, are derived in detail from the physical system. The model can be used for further analysis via computer simulation in predicting dynamic response in its main docking direction, i.e., up-and-down motion.
Keywords: Stewart platform, docking operation, spacecraft, spring constant.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 67References:
[1] D. Stewart “A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 180 (1, No 15): 371-386, 1965-1966.
[2] D.R. Riley, B.M. Jaguet, J.E. Pennington, et al, “Comparison of Results of Two Simulations Employing Full-size Visual-cue for Pilot-controlled Gemini-Agena Docking. NASA TND-3687, 1966:1-35.
[3] U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. U.S. – Russian Cooperation in Space. OTA-ISS-618. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1995: 1-130.
[4] C. Lange, & E. Martin. “Towards Docking Emulation Using Hardware in the Loop Simulation with Parallel Platform,” Proceedings of the Workshop on Fundamental Issue and Future Directions for Parallel Mechanism and Manipulators, Ouebec, Canada, 2002: 1-4.
[5] J. Han, Q. Huang, & T. Chang, “Research on Space Docking HIL Simulation System Based on Stewart 6-DOF Motion System,” Proceedings of the 7th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, Toyama, Japan, September 2008.
[6] J. Ueda, Y. Sadamoto, “A Measurement of the Effective Mass of Coil Springs.” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 66 (2): 367-368, 1997.
[7] W. Uddin, R. Mitra, T. Husain, & E. Ofori, “A Chirp PWM Scheme for Brushless DC Drives,” IEEE Conference on Energy Congress and Exposition, September 2012.
[8] H. Yang, S.B. Ryu, H.C. Lee, S.G. Lee, S.S. Yong, & J.H. Kim, “Implementation of DDS chirp signal generator on FPGA,” International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence, pp. 956-959, 2014.
[9] B. Gustavsen and A. Semlyen, “Rational approximation of frequency domain responses by Vector Fitting,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 1052-1061, July 1999.
[10] B. Gustavsen, “User’s Guide for vectfit3.m – Fast, Relaxed Vector Fitting for MATLAB,” SINTEF Energy Research, Trondheim, Norway, 2008.