Decision-Making Tool for Planning the Construction of Infrastructure Projects
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Decision-Making Tool for Planning the Construction of Infrastructure Projects

Authors: R. Monib, C. I. Goodier, A. Gibb

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to investigate the key drivers in planning the construction phase for infrastructure projects to reduce project delays. To achieve this aim, the research conducted three case studies using semi-structured and unstructured interviews (n = 59). The results conclude that a lack of modularization awareness is among the key factors attributed to project delays. The current emotive and ill-informed approach to decision-making, coupled with the lack of knowledge regarding appropriate construction method selection, prevents the potential benefits of modularization being fully realized. To assist with decision-making for the best construction method, the research presents project management tools to help decision makers to choose the most appropriate construction approach through optimizing the use of modularization in engineering and construction (EC). A decision-making checklist is presented in this paper. This checklist tool assists the project team in determining the best construction method, taking into consideration the module type.

Keywords: Infrastructure, modularization, decision support, planning.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 116

References:


[1] A. Naji and C. Panzer, C. Challenges Facing the GCC Oil & Gas Industry. Gulf Research Centre Cambridge. 2011.Available at https://www.gulfresearchmeeting.net/documents/158460626384_Workshop-11.pdf.
[2] J. Kumar. Analysis of Oil and Gas Projects with Focus on SAGD projects. PhD Thesis. Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary, 2016
[3] A. Bondi, A. Magagnini, M. Mancini, G.J.L. Micheli, A. Travaglini, “Supporting decisions on industrial plant modularization: A case study approach in the Oil and Gas Sector”, IEOM Society International, 2016, pp. 742–753.
[4] F. B. Eltyeb. Effect of oil price volatility on construction projects in United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews, 2017, 5 (1), 28-31.
[5] D. McNair. EPC Contracts in the Oil and Gas sector. PWC. Available at: www.pwc.com.au. 2016.
[6] M. Salama, M. Ahmed and B. Keogh. Investigating the causes of delay within Oil and Gas projects in the UAE. 24th Annual ARCOM Conference. 2008, pp. 819–827.
[7] Abdullah and Egbu. The application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as a decision tool in choosing the type of industrialised building system (IBS) for housing projects. 2011. 27th Annual Arcom Conference. Bristol, UK
[8] J. T. O’Connor, W. J., O’Brien, J. O., Choi, “Critical success factors and enablers for optimum and maximum industrial modularization” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 140 (6), 2014, 1–11.
[9] O. Gjepali. Developing an Early-Phase Decision Support Tool for the Client/Owner in the Engineering Construction Sector. Master Thesis. Italy: Milano University, 2015.
[10] W. Pan, A. R. J. Dainty and Gibb, A. G. F. Establishing and Weighting Decision Criteria for Building System Selection in Housing Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE. 2012 138 (11) 1239–1250.
[11] J. K. Gershenson, G. J. Prasad, Y. Zhang. “Product modularity: measures and design methods”. Journal of Engineering Design 15(1), 2004, pp.33-51.
[12] W. Pan, A. G. Gibb, A. R. Dainty, “Leading UK housebuilders’ utilization of offsite construction methods”, Building Research and Information,36(1), 2008, pp. 56-67.
[13] K. Vernikos, C. Goodier, A. G. F., Gibb, “Building information modeling and offsite construction in Civil Engineering”. ARCOM Doctoral Workshop on BIM Management and Interoperability. 167, June, 2013, pp. 1–10.
[14] M. R. Abdullah, C. Egbu, “The application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as a decision tool in choosing the type of industrialised building system (IBS) for housing projects”, 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2011, Bristol, UK.
[15] J. T. O’Connor, W. J. O’Brien, J. O. Choi, Industrial Modularization How to optimize; How to Maximize. The University of Texas at Austin, 1993.
[16] E. Besteiro, J. D. S. Pinto, J. D. S. and O. Novaski, O. Success factors in project management. Business Management Dynamics. 2015,4 (9), 19-34.
[17] M. Mulrooney and G. Shahani. Modularization: The key to success in today’s market. Hydrocarbon Processing. Available at http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/magazine/2016/december-2016Huber,
[18] A. Gibb and F. Isack. Re-engineering through pre-assembly: Client expectations and drivers. Building Research and Information.2003. 31(2), 146-160.
[19] K. Akagi, M. Yoshida, K. Murayama and J. Kawahata Modularization technology in powerplant construction. 10th Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Nuclear Engineering Division.2002. 641-647.