An Energy-Efficient Model of Integrating Telehealth IoT Devices with Fog and Cloud Computing-Based Platform
Authors: Yunyong Guo, Sudhakar Ganti, Bryan Guo
Abstract:
The rapid growth of telehealth Internet of Things (IoT) devices has raised concerns about energy consumption and efficient data processing. This paper presents an energy-efficient model that integrates telehealth IoT devices with a fog and cloud computing-based platform, offering a sustainable and robust solution to overcome these challenges. Our model employs fog computing as a localized data processing layer while leveraging cloud computing for resource-intensive tasks, significantly reducing energy consumption. We incorporate adaptive energy-saving strategies. Simulation analysis validates our approach's effectiveness in enhancing energy efficiency for telehealth IoT systems integrated with localized fog nodes and both private and public cloud infrastructures. Future research will focus on further optimization of the energy-saving model, exploring additional functional enhancements, and assessing its broader applicability in other healthcare and industry sectors.
Keywords: Energy-efficient, fog computing, IoT, telehealth.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 177References:
[1] Atlam, H. F., Walters, R. J., and Wills, G. B. (2018). Fog computing and the internet of things: A review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2(2):10, DOI:10.3390/bdcc202001.
[2] Kumar, P., Patil, K., Lee, J. H., & Lee, H. J. (2020). IoT-based remote patient monitoring: A survey on the capabilities, challenges, and future directions. Electronics, 9(10), 1702.
[3] Gupta, H., Nath, A. R., Chakraborty, S., & Ghosh, S. K. (2016). iFogSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the Internet of Things, Edge and Fog computing environments. Software: Practice and Experience, 47(9), 1275-1296.
[4] Oueis, J., Strinati, E. C., & Barbarossa, S. (2015). The fog balancing: Load distribution for small cell cloud computing. In 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[5] Barcelo, M., Correa, A., Llorca, J., Tulino, A. M., Vicario, J. L., & Morell, A. (2016). IoT-cloud service optimization in next generation smart environments. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(12), 4077-4090.
[6] Zeng, X., Garg, S., & Strazdins, P. (2017). A comparative study of IoT cloud and fog computing simulations using iFogSim and Cooja. In 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC) (pp. 108-113). IEEE.
[7] Byers, C. C., & Wetterwald, P. (2015). Fog computing distributing data and intelligence for resiliency and scale necessary for IoT: The Internet of Things (ubiquity symposium). Ubiquity, 2015(November), 1-12.
[8] Bermejo, P. J., Rodríguez, S., Valladares, D. R., & Boubeta-Puig, J. (2020). YAFS: A simulator for IoT scenarios in fog computing. IEEE Access, 8, 111908-111922.
[9] García, A. M., Pérez, J. P., & Bellido, O. J. (2018). YAFS: A simulator for IoT scenarios in fog computing. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP) (pp. 215-222). IEEE.