Privacy Concerns and Law Enforcement Data Collection to Tackle Domestic and Sexual Violence

Authors: Francesca Radice

Abstract:

It has been observed that violent or coercive behaviour has been apparent from initial conversations on dating apps like Tinder. Child pornography, stalking, and coercive control are some criminal offences from dating apps, including women murdered after finding partners through Tinder. Police databases and predictive policing are novel approaches taken to prevent crime before harm is done. This research will investigate how police databases can be used in a privacy-preserving way to characterise users in terms of their potential for violent crime. Using the COPS database of NSW Police, we will explore how the past criminal record can be interpreted to yield a category of potential danger for each dating app user. It is up to the judgement of each subscriber on what degree of the potential danger they are prepared to enter into. Sentiment analysis is an area where research into natural language processing has made great progress over the last decade. This research will investigate how sentiment analysis can be used to interpret interchanges between dating app users to detect manipulative or coercive sentiments. These can be used to alert law enforcement if continued for a defined number of communications. One of the potential problems of this approach is the potential prejudice a categorisation can cause. Another drawback is the possibility of misinterpreting communications and involving law enforcement without reason. The approach will be thoroughly tested with cross-checks by human readers who verify both the level of danger predicted by the interpretation of the criminal record and the sentiment detected from personal messages. Even if only a few violent crimes can be prevented, the approach will have a tangible value for real people.

Keywords: Sentiment Analysis, data mining, predictive policing, virtual manipulation.

References:

[1] Geir Aas. Fieldwork in police studies–the ethical dilemma in participatory observation with police patrols. Police Practice and Research, 22(1):835–848, 2021.
[2] Zohre Ahmadabadi, Jackob M Najman, Gail M Williams, and Alexandra M Clavarino. Income, gender, and forms of intimate partner violence. Journal of interpersonal violence, 35(23-24):5500–5525, 2020.
[3] Kavita Alejo. Long-term physical and mental health effects of domestic violence. Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science, 2(1):5, 2014.
[4] Lindsey Barrett. Reasonably suspicious algorithms: predictive policing at the United States border. NYU Rev. L. & Soc. Change, 41:327, 2017.
[5] Danielle Boulanger and Gilles Dubois. An object approach for information system cooperation. Information Systems, 23(6):383–399, 1998.
[6] Hayley Boxall, Anthony Morgan, and Rick Brown. The prevalence of domestic violence among women during the covid-19 pandemic. Australasian Policing, 12(3):38–46, 2020.
[7] Carolyn Briggs. An emerging trend in domestic violence: Technology- facilitated abuse. Australian Journal of Child and Family Health Nursing, 15(1):2, 2018.
[8] Axel C Carlsson, Ulrika Owen, and Gita Rajan. Sexual violence, mental health, and suicidality—results from a survey in cooperation with idea- driven organizations and their social media platform followers. Health science reports, 6(1):e973, 2023.
[9] Jireh Yi-Le Chan, Khean Thye Bea, Steven Mun Hong Leow, Seuk Wai Phoong, and Wai Khuen Cheng. State of the art: a review of sentiment analysis based on sequential transfer learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(1):749–780, 2023.
[10] Eleftherios Chelioudakis. Risk assessment tools in criminal justice: Is there a need for such tools in Europe and would their use comply with European data protection law? ANU Journal of Law and Technology, 2020.
[11] Hannah LF Cooper. War on drugs policing and police brutality. Substance use & misuse, 50(8-9):1188–1194, 2015.
[12] Heather Douglas, Bridget A Harris, and Molly Dragiewicz. Technology- facilitated domestic and family violence: Women’s experiences. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3):551–570, 2019.
[13] Laurel Eckhouse, Kristian Lum, Cynthia Conti-Cook, and Julie Ciccolini. Layers of bias: A unified approach for understanding problems with risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(2):185–209, 2019.
[14] Mike Enders and Lily Enders. Cops, computers and the right to privacy in the information age: unauthorised access and inappropriate disclosure of information complaints in New South Wales. AJIS: Australian journal of information systems, 8(2), 2001. ISSN 1449-8618.
[15] Claudia García-Moreno, Christina Pallitto, Karen Devries, Heidi Stöckl, Charlotte Watts, and Naeema Abrahams. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization, 2013.
[16] Carlo Gatti et al. Policing the poor through space: The fil rouge from criminal cartography to geospatial predictive policing. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(6):1733–1758, 2022.
[17] Ateret Gewirtz-Meydan, Denise Volman-Pampanel, Eugenia Opuda, and Noam Tarshish. Dating apps: a new emerging platform for sexual harassment? a scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, page 15248380231162969, 2023.
[18] Lisa A Goodman, Mary Ann Dutton, and Maxine Harris. Episodically homeless women with serious mental illness: Prevalence of physical and sexual assault. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65(4):468–478, 1995.
[19] Nicola Henry and Anastasia Powell. Sexual violence in the digital age: The scope and limits of criminal law. Social & legal studies, 25(4):397–418, 2016.
[20] Nicola Henry, Asher Flynn, and Anastasia Powell. Technology-facilitated domestic and sexual violence: A review. Violence Against Women, 26 (15-16):1828–1854, 2020.
[21] Ann Hunt, Karen Webber, Jennaya Montgomery, and Amy Duong. Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia 2018. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018.
[22] Neetu John, Sara E Casey, Giselle Carino, and Terry McGovern. Lessons never learned: crisis and gender-based violence. Developing world bioethics, 20(2):65–68, 2020.
[23] Archa Joshy and Sumod Sundar. Analyzing the performance of sentiment analysis using Bert, Distilbert, and Roberta. In 2022 IEEE International Power and Renewable Energy Conference (IPRECON), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2022.
[24] Usman Naseem, Imran Razzak, Shah Khalid Khan, and Mukesh Prasad. A comprehensive survey on word representation models: From classical to state-of-the-art word representation language models. Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, 20(5):1– 35, 2021.
[25] Katalin Parti, Robin A Robinson, David Kohlmann, Enikö Virágh, and Dóra Varga-Sabján. Beyond obstacles: toward justice for victims of sexual violence in Hungary. A literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(1): 203–217, 2023.
[26] Dean Peacock. Moving beyond a reliance on criminal legal strategies to address the root causes of domestic and sexual violence. Violence against women, 28(8):1890–1907, 2022.
[27] Janet Phillips and Penny Vandenbroek. Domestic, family and sexual violence in Australia: an overview of the issues. 2014.
[28] Focal Points. United nations interregional crime and justice research institute (unicri).
[29] Kamarah Pooley and Hayley Boxall. Mobile dating applications and sexual and violent offending. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice (electronic resource), (612):1–16, 2020.
[30] Gina Potarca. The demography of swiping right. an overview of couples who met through dating apps in Switzerland. PLoS One, 15(12):e0243733, 2020.
[31] Anastasia Powell and Nicola Henry. Policing technology-facilitated sexual violence against adult victims: Police and service sector perspectives. Policing and Society, 28(3):291–307, 2018.
[32] Ethel Quayle. Prevention, disruption and deterrence of online child sexual exploitation and abuse. In Era Forum, volume 21, pages 429–447. Springer, 2020.
[33] Vicki Sentas and Camilla Pandolfini. Policing young people in NSW: A study of the suspect targeting management plan. Youth Justice Coalition, 2017.
[34] Pritam Gajkumar Shah. Optus data breach Australia year 2022–case study. Australian Journal of Wireless Technologies, Mobility and Security, 1, 2022.
[35] Jemimah Steinfeld. Forced out of the closet: As people live out more of their lives online right now, our report highlights how LGBTQ dating apps can put people’s lives at risk. Index on Censorship, 49(2):101–104, 2020.
[36] Heather L Storer, Maria Rodriguez, and Roxanne Franklin. “Leaving was a process, not an event”: The lived experience of dating and domestic violence in 140 characters. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(11-12): NP6553–NP6580, 2021.
[37] Federica Taccini and Stefania Mannarini. An attempt to conceptualize the phenomenon of stigma toward intimate partner violence survivors: a systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3):194, 2023.
[38] Laura Vitis. Surveillant assemblage: Overt, covert, movement and social surveillance in domestic and family violence in Singapore. In Women’s Studies International Forum, volume 96, page 102664. Elsevier, 2023.
[39] Steve Yeong et al. An evaluation of the suspect target management plan. Crime and Justice Bulletin, 2020.
[40] Aleš Završnik. Big data, crime and social control. Routledge, 2017.
[41] Mai Zhu, Bo Chang, and Chong Fu. Convolutional neural networks combined with runge–kutta methods. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(2): 1629–1643, 2023.