Case-Based Reasoning Application to Predict Geological Features at Site C Dam Construction Project
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Case-Based Reasoning Application to Predict Geological Features at Site C Dam Construction Project

Authors: S. Behnam Malekzadeh, I. Kerr, T. Kaempffer, T. Harper, A Watson

Abstract:

The Site C Hydroelectric dam is currently being constructed in north-eastern British Columbia on sub-horizontal sedimentary strata that dip approximately 15 meters from one bank of the Peace River to the other. More than 615 pressure sensors (Vibrating Wire Piezometers) have been installed on bedding planes (BPs) since construction began, with over 80 more planned before project completion. These pressure measurements are essential to monitor the stability of the rock foundation during and after construction and for dam safety purposes. BPs are identified by their clay gouge infilling, which varies in thickness from less than 1 to 20 mm and can be challenging to identify as the core drilling process often disturbs or washes away the gouge material. Without the use of depth predictions from nearby boreholes, stratigraphic markers, and downhole geophysical data, it is difficult to confidently identify BP targets for the sensors. In this paper, a Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) method was used to develop an empirical model called the Bedding Plane Elevation Prediction (BPEP) to help geologists and geotechnical engineers to predict geological features and BPs at new locations in a fast and accurate manner. To develop CBR, a database was developed based on 64 pressure sensors already installed on key bedding planes BP25, BP28, and BP31 on the Right Bank, including BP elevations and coordinates. 13 (20%) of the most recent cases were selected to validate and evaluate the accuracy of the developed model, while the similarity was defined as the distance between previous cases and recent cases to predict the depth of significant BPs. The average difference between actual BP elevations and predicted elevations for above BPs was ± 55 cm, while the actual results showed that 69% of predicted elevations were within ± 79 cm of actual BP elevations while 100% of predicted elevations for new cases were within ± 99 cm range. Eventually, the actual results will be used to develop the database and improve BPEP to perform as a learning machine to predict more accurate BP elevations for future sensor installations.

Keywords: Case-Based Reasoning, CBR, geological feature, geology, piezometer, pressure sensor, core logging, dam construction.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 81

References:


[1] H. F. Ferguson, “Valley Stress Release in the Allegheny Plateau. Bulletin Association Engineering Geology”, 1967, Vol. 4, No.1, pp.63-71.
[2] H. F. Ferguson, “Geologic Observations and Geotechnical Effects of Valley Stress Relief in the Allegheny Plateau. Preprint”, ASCE National Meeting on Water Resources, Los Angeles, CA, 1974, pp.31.
[3] H. F. Ferguson, J. V. Hamel, “Valley Stress Relief in Flat-lying Sedimentary Rocks. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Weak Rock”, Tokyo, Japan, 1981, pp.1235-1240.
[4] J. V. Hamel, “Harry Ferguson’s Theory of Valley Stress Release in Flat-Lying Sedimentary Rocks. IAEG/AEG Annual Meeting Proceedings”, San Francisco, CA, 2018, Vol. 2 pp. 121-127.
[5] D. S. Matheson, “Geotechnical Implications of Valley Rebound.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alberta, 1972.
[6] D. S. Matheson, S. Thompson, “Geological Implications of Valley Rebound”, Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 1974, Vol. 10, pp.961-978.
[7] S.B. Malekzadeh, “A new expert model to evaluate maximum settlement – Case study: Niayesh tunnel”. World Tunneling Congress (WTC2022), Copenhagen, Denmark, 2022.
[8] D. B. Leake, "Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions". Menlo Park, Canada: AAAI Press, 1996.
[9] J. Kolonder, "Case-Based Reasoning". San Mateo, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
[10] I. Watson, "Applying Case-Based Reasoning: Techniques for Enterprise Systems". San Mateo, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.
[11] J. H. Holland, "Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems". University of Michigan Press, 1975
[12] R. C. Schank and R. P. Abelson, "Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures". Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.
[13] M. Takahashi, J. I. Oono and K. Saitog, "Manufacturing process design by CBR with knowledge ware". IEEE Expert, 1995.
[14] H. Rivard and S. J. Fenves, "SEED-Config: a tool for conceptual structural design in a collaborative building design environment". Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 2000, pp. 233-247.
[15] T. Mileman, B. Knight, M. Petridis, D. Cowell and J. Ewer, "Case-based retrieval of 3D shapes for the design of metal castings". Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2002, pp. 39-45.
[16] R. Amen and P. Vomacka, "Case-based reasoning as a tool for materials selection". Materials and design, 2001, pp. 353-358.
[17] P. Mejasson, M. Petridis, B. Knight, A. Soper and P. Norman, "Intelligent design assistant (IDA): a case base reasoning system for material and design". Materials and Design, 2001, pp. 163-170.
[18] B. S. Yang, T. Han and Y. S. Kim, "Integration of ART-Kohonen neural network and case-based reasoning for intelligent fault diagnosis". Expert Systems with Applications, 2004, pp. 387-395.
[19] S. S. R. Abidi and S. Manickam, "Leveraging XML-based electronic medical records to extract experiential clinical knowledge". International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2002, pp. 187-203.
[20] N. Gardan and Y. Gardan, "An application of knowledge-based modelling using scripts". Expert Systems with Applications, 2003, pp. 555-568.
[21] A. Aamodt and E. Plaza, "Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches". Artificial Intelligence Communications Journal, 1994, pp. 39-52.
[22] A. Dugger, "A Step Towards an Intelligent Digital Training Management System (I-DTMS)." 2016.
[23] K. Young-Woong, "Geometric Case Based Reasoning for Stock Market Prediction." Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 17, 2020, p. 7124.
[24] S. Craw, "Introspective Learning to Build Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) Knowledge Containers". IAPR International Workshop on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLDM2003), Leipzig, Germany, 2003.
[25] S. Behnam Malekzadeh, K. Shahriar and S. H. Khoshrou, "Investigation on ancient rivers and its efficiencies on soft soil tunneling – NIAYESH tunneling project". Bangkok, Thailand, 2012.
[26] S. H. Ji, M. Park, H. S. Lee and Y. S. Yoon, "Similarity measurement method of Case-based reasoning for conceptual cost estimation". International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Nottingham, UK, 2010.
[27] H. D. Burkhard, "Similarity and distance in Case-Based Reasoning". Fundamenta informaticea, 2001, pp. 201-215.
[28] . L. Heung-Keun, "Conceptual Cost Estimating System Development for Public Housing Projects." 2012,
[29] www.sitecproject.com, “Quarterly Progress Report No.27”, 2022, pp.6.
[30] A. D. Watson, G. W. Stevenson, A. Hanna, “Site C Clean Energy Project, Design Overview”, International Congress on Large Dams, Ottawa, Canada, 2019.
[31] G. M. D. Hartman, J. J. Clague, “Quaternary Stratigraphy and Glacial History of the Peace River Valley Northeast British Columbia”, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2008, Vol. 45 No.5 pp. 549-564.