Improving Decision Support for Organ Transplant
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33093
Improving Decision Support for Organ Transplant

Authors: I. McCulloh, A. Placona, D. Stewart, D. Gause, K. Kiernan, M. Stuart, C. Zinner, L. Cartwright

Abstract:

We find in our data that an alarming number of viable deceased donor kidneys are discarded every year in the US, while waitlisted candidates are dying every day. We observe as many as 85% of transplanted organs are refused at least once for a patient that scored higher on the match list. There are hundreds of clinical variables involved in making a clinical transplant decision and there is rarely an ideal match. Decision makers exhibit an optimism bias where they may refuse an organ offer assuming a better match is imminent. We propose a semi-parametric Cox proportional hazard model, augmented by an accelerated failure time model based on patient-specific suitable organ supply and demand to estimate a time-to-next-offer. Performance is assessed with Cox-Snell residuals and decision curve analysis, demonstrating improved decision support for up to a 5-year outlook. Providing clinical decision-makers with quantitative evidence of likely patient outcomes (e.g., time to next offer and the mortality associated with waiting) may improve decisions and reduce optimism bias, thus reducing discarded organs and matching more patients on the waitlist.

Keywords: Decision science, KDPI, optimism bias, organ transplant.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 181

References:


[1] Axelrod DA, Schnitzler MA, Xiao H, Irish W, Tuttle‐Newhall E, Chang SH, Kasiske BL, Alhamad T, Lentine KL. An economic assessment of contemporary kidney transplant practice. American Journal of Transplantation. 2018 May;18(5):1168-76. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(5):1168-1176. doi:10.1111/ajt.14702.
[2] Volk ML, Goodrich N, Lai JC, Sonnenday C, Shedden K. Decision support for organ offers in liver transplantation. Liver transplantation. 2015 Jun;21(6):784-91.
[3] Mittal S, Adamusiak A, Horsfield C, Loukopoulos I, Karydis N, Kessaris N, Drage M, Olsburgh J, Watson CJ, Callaghan CJ. A re-evaluation of discarded deceased donor kidneys in the UK: are usable organs still being discarded?. Transplantation. 2017 Jul 1;101(7):1698-703.
[4] Stewart D, Shepard B, Rosendale J, McGehee H, Hall I, Gupta G, Reddy K, Kasiske B, Andreoni K, Klassen D. Can behavioral research improve transplant decision-making? A mock offer study on the role of kidney procurement biopsies. Kidney360. 2020 Jan 30;1(1):36.
[5] Li MT, King KL, Husain SA, Schold JD, Mohan S. Deceased donor kidneys utilization and discard rates during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Kidney international reports. 2021 Sep;6(9):2463.
[6] Brennan C, Husain SA, King KL, Tsapepas D, Ratner LE, Jin Z, Schold JD, Mohan S. A donor utilization index to assess the utilization and discard of deceased donor kidneys perceived as high risk. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):1634-41.
[7] Carpenter DJ, Chiles MC, Verna EC, Halazun KJ, Emond JC, Ratner LE, Mohan S. Deceased brain dead donor liver transplantation and utilization in the United States: nighttime and weekend effects. Transplantation. 2019 Jul;103(7):1392.
[8] Mohan S, Foley K, Chiles MC, Dube GK, Patzer RE, Pastan SO, Crew RJ, Cohen DJ, Ratner LE. The weekend effect alters the procurement and discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Kidney international. 2016 Jul 1;90(1):157-63.
[9] McCulloh, I., Stewart, D., Kiernan, K., Yazicioglu, F., Patsolic, H., Zinner, C., Mohan, S., Cartwright, L.. An experiment on the impact of predictive analytics on kidney offer acceptance decisions. American Journal of Transplantation Under Review
[10] Heilman RL, Green EP, Reddy KS, Moss A, Kaplan B. Potential impact of risk and loss aversion on the process of accepting kidneys for transplantation. Transplantation. 2017 Jul 1;101(7):1514-7.
[11] Husain SA, King KL, Pastan S, Patzer RE, Cohen DJ, Radhakrishnan J, Mohan S. Association between declined offers of deceased donor kidney allograft and outcomes in kidney transplant candidates. JAMA network open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312-.
[12] Ibrahim M, Vece G, Mehew J, Johnson R, Forsythe J, Klassen D, Callaghan C, Stewart D. An international comparison of deceased donor kidney utilization: What can the United States and the United Kingdom learn from each other?. American Journal of Transplantation. 2020 May;20(5):1309-22.
[13] Mohan S, Chiles MC, Patzer RE, Pastan SO, Husain SA, Carpenter DJ, Dube GK, Crew RJ, Ratner LE, Cohen DJ. Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Kidney international. 2018 Jul 1;94(1):187-98.
[14] Reese PP, Harhay MN, Abt PL, Levine MH, Halpern SD. New solutions to reduce discard of kidneys donated for transplantation. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2016 Apr 1;27(4):973-80.
[15] Vinkers MT, Smits JM, Tieken IC, de Boer J, Ysebaert D, Rahmel AO. Kidney donation and transplantation in Eurotransplant 2006–2007: minimizing discard rates by using a rescue allocation policy. Progress in transplantation. 2009 Dec;19(4):365-70.
[16] Schnier KE, Cox JC, McIntyre C, Ruhil R, Sadiraj V, Turgeon N. Transplantation at the nexus of behavioral economics and health care delivery. American Journal of Transplantation. 2013 Jan;13(1):31-5.
[17] Kaplan EL. This week’s citation classic. Current Contents. 1983 Apr 15;24:14.
[18] Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American statistical association. 1958 Jun 1;53(282):457-81.
[19] Cox DR. Regression models and life‐tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1972 Jan;34(2):187-202.
[20] Kay R, Kinnersley N. On the use of the accelerated failure time model as an alternative to the proportional hazards model in the treatment of time to event data: a case study in influenza. Drug information journal. 2002 Jul;36(3):571-9.
[21] Cox DR, Snell EJ. A general definition of residuals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1968 Jul;30(2):248-65.
[22] Wolfe RA, McCullough KP, Schaubel DE, Kalbfleisch JD, Murray S, Stegall MD, Leichtman AB. Calculating life years from transplant (LYFT): methods for kidney and kidney‐pancreas candidates. American Journal of Transplantation. 2008 Apr;8(4p2):997-1011.
[23] Discern Health. Fact Sheet. https://kidneycarepartners.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Chronic-Conditions-Fact-Sheet_02_25.pdf. 2019. Accessed 08/15/2022.
[24] Hariharan S, Israni AK, Danovitch G. Long-term survival after kidney transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021 Aug 19;385(8):729-43.
[25] Finlayson SG, Subbaswamy A, Singh K, Bowers J, Kupke A, Zittrain J, Kohane IS, Saria S. The clinician and dataset shift in artificial intelligence. The New England journal of medicine. 2021 Jul 7;385(3):283.
[26] Brentnall AR, Cuzick J. Use of the concordance index for predictors of censored survival data. Statistical methods in medical research. 2018 Aug;27(8):2359-73.
[27] Vickers AJ, van Calster B, Steyerberg EW. A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis. Diagnostic and prognostic research. 2019 Dec;3(1):1-8.
[28] Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). 2022. OPTN predictive analytics project to launch education in December 2022, is intended to increase organ utilization - OPTN. OPTN. Retrieved October 24, 2022, from https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/news/optn-predictive-analytics-project-to-launch-education-in-december-2022-is-intended-to-increase-organ-utilization/