Investigation of Compressive Strength of Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Incorporated with Rice Husk Ash Using 12M Alkaline Activator
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33093
Investigation of Compressive Strength of Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Incorporated with Rice Husk Ash Using 12M Alkaline Activator

Authors: Festus A. Olutoge, Ahmed A. Akintunde, Anuoluwapo S. Kolade, Aaron A. Chadee, Jovanca Smith

Abstract:

Geopolymer concrete's (GPC) compressive strength was investigated. The GPC was incorporated with rice husk ash (RHA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), which may have potential in the construction industry to replace Portland limestone cement (PLC) concrete. The sustainable construction binders used were GGBFS and RHA, and a solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate gel (Na2SiO3) was used as the 12-molar alkaline activator. Five GPC mixes comprising fine aggregates, coarse aggregates, GGBS, and RHA, and the alkaline solution in the ratio 2: 2.5: 1: 0.5, respectively, were prepared to achieve grade 40 concrete, and PLC was substituted with GGBFS and RHA in the ratios of 0:100, 25:75, 50:50, 75:25, and 100:0. A control mix was also prepared which comprised of 100% water and 100% PLC as the cementitious material. The GPC mixes were thermally cured at 60-80 ºC in an oven for approximately 24 h. After curing for 7 and 28 days, the compressive strength test results of the hardened GPC samples showed that GPC-Mix #3, comprising 50% GGBFS and 50% RHA, was the most efficient geopolymer mix. The mix had compressive strengths of 35.71 MPa and 47.26 MPa, 19.87% and 8.69% higher than the PLC concrete samples, which had 29.79 MPa and 43.48 MPa after 7 and 28 days, respectively. Therefore, GPC containing GGBFS incorporated with RHA is an efficient method of decreasing the use of PLC in conventional concrete production and reducing the high amounts of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere in the construction industry.

Keywords: Alkaline solution, cementitious material, geopolymer concrete, ground granulated blast furnace slag, rice husk ash.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 189

References:


[1] D. Hardjito and B. V. Rangan, “Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete,” Research Report GC 1 submitted to Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, Jan. 2005, available at: https://bit.ly/researchgate_publication-228794879
[2] M. G. Kamaldeep and K. S. Chamberlin, “Experimental Study on Performance of Concrete by using Combination of Fly ash and GGBS as Blended Material,” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6C2, pp. 490-495, Apr. 2019.
[3] H. A. Toutanji and T. El-Korchi, “The Influence of silica fume on the compressive strength of cement paste and mortar,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1591-1602, Mar. 1995.
[4] P. K. Mehta and O. E. Gjorv, “Properties of portland cement concrete containing fly ash and condensed silica fume,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 587-595, Feb. 1982.
[5] S. Wang, E. Llamazos, L. Baxter, and F. Fonseca, “Durability of biomass fly ash concrete: Freezing and thawing and rapid chloride permeability tests,” Fuel, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 359-364, Mar. 2008, available at: https://doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.027
[6] C. S. Poon, S. C. Kou, and L. Lam, “Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 858-865, Dec. 2006.
[7] M. J. Shannag and H. A. Shaia, “Sulphate resistance of high-performance concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 363-369, Apr. 2003.
[8] J. Davidovits, “Geopolymer Cement: A review,” Geopolymer Science and Technics, Technical Paper no. 21, pp. 1-11, Jan. 2013.
[9] M. F. Nuruddin, A. B. Malkawi, A. Fauzi, B. S. Mohammed, and H. M. Almattarneh, “Evolution of geopolymer binders: a review.” IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 133, no. 1, 012021, June 2016.
[10] M. Saafi et al., “Multifunctional properties of carbon nanotube/fly ash geopolymeric nanocomposites,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 49, pp. 46-55, Dec. 2013.
[11] Ch. K. Yip, G. G. Lukey, and J. S. J. Van Deventer, “The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at early stage of alkaline activation,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1688-1697, Sept. 2005, available at: https://doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.042
[12] S. K. Das, J. Mishra, and S. M. Mustakim, "Rice Husk Ash as a Potential Source Material for Geopolymer Concrete: A," International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 81-84, Oct. 2018.
[13] M. S. Ismail and A. M. Waliuddin, “Effect of Rice Husk Ash on High Strength Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 521-526, Oct. 1996.
[14] R. P. Venkatesan and K. C. Pazhani, “Strength and durability properties of Geopolymer concrete made with ground granulated blast furnace slag and black rice husk ash,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 2384 – 2391, Sept. 2016.
[15] S. Kumaravel, “Development of various curing effect of normal strength geopolymer Concrete,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 116-119, Apr. 2014, available at: https://doi:10.25103/jestr.071.19
[16] B. Singh, G. M. Ishwarya, M. Gupta, and S. K. Bhattacharyya, “Geopolymer concrete: A review of recent developments,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 85, pp. 78-90, Mar. 2015, available at: https://doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036
[17] V. V. Yewale, M. N. Shirsath, and S. L. Hake, “Evaluation of efficient type of curing for Geopolymer concrete,” International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 10-14, Aug. 2016.
[18] M. F. Nurruddin, H. Sani, S. M. Bashar, and G. S. Ibrahim, “Methods of curing geopolymer concrete: A review.” International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31-36, Jan. 2018, available at: https://doi:10.21833/ijaas.2018.01.005
[19] BS EN 450-1, Fly ash for Concrete - Definitions, Specifications, and Conformity Criteria. British Standards Institution (BSI), London, 2012.
[20] BS EN 8615-2, Specification for Pozzolanic Materials for Use with Portland Cement - High Reactivity Natural Calcined Pozzolana. British Standards Institution (BSI), London, 2019.
[21] A. A. Raheem and M. Kareem, “Chemical Composition and Physical Characteristics of Rice Husk Ash Blended Cement,” International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, vol. 32, pp. 25-35, Sept. 2017.
[22] BS EN 15167-1, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag for Use in Concrete, Mortar and Grout - Definitions, Specifications and Conformity Criteria. British Standards Institution (BSI), London, 2006.
[23] S. Oyebisi, A. Ede, F. Olutoge, H. Owamah, and T. Igba, “Slag-based geopolymer concrete incorporating ash: effects on thermal performance,” Australian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 208-221, Nov. July 2021, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2021.1953234
[24] A. A. Adam, T. C. K. Molyneaux, I. Patnaikuni, D. W. and Law, “Strength, sorptivity and carbonation in blended OPC-GGBS, alkali activated slag, and fly ash based geopolymer concrete,” in 5th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, Las Vegas, 2009, pp. 563-568.
[25] BS EN 196-2, Methods of Testing Cement - Chemical Analysis of Cement. British Standards Institution, London (BSI), 2016.
[26] M. D. A. Thomas, Optimizing the use of fly ash in concrete. Portland Cement Association, 2007, vol. 5420, pp. 1-24.
[27] M. Kumar, “Geopolymer Concrete: Leading the World towards a Sustainable Future,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT), vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 302-306, Sept. 2015.
[28] V. Hariharan, G. Silambarasan, and N. Harishkumar, "Utilisation of Flyash and GGBS as a Fully Replacement of Cement in Geopolymer Concrete," in International Conference on Emerging trends in Engineering, Science and Sustainable Technology, (ICETSST-2017), Erode, 2017, pp. 26-29.
[29] M. M. A. Abdullah, K. Hussin, M. Bnhussain, K. N. Ismail, and W. M. W. Ibrahim, “Mechanism and Chemical Reaction of Fly Ash Geopolymer Cement - A Review,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35-44, Jan. 2011.
[30] J. Davidovits, “Properties of geopolymer cements,” in 1st International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 11-14.
[31] J. Davidovits, Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications (5th ed.). Saint-Quentin: Institut Géopolymère, 2008, ch. 1.
[32] M. I. Abdul Aleem, P. D. Arumairaj, and S. Vairam, S., “Chemical Formulation of Geopolymer Concrete with M-Sand,” International Journal of Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture & Design, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54-60, Dec. 2013.
[33] I. H. Aziz, M. M. A. Abdullah, H. C. Yong, L. Y. Ming, K. Hussin, A. A. Kadir, and E. A. Azimi, “Manufacturing of Fire Resistance Geopolymer: A Review,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1-6, Jan. 2016, available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167801023
[34] M. Mannan and C. Ganapathy, “Concrete from an agricultural waste-oil palm shell (OPS),” Build. Environ., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 41-48, April 2004.
[35] A. B. Malkawi, H. Al-Mattarneh, B. E. Achara, B. S. Muhammed, and M. F. Nuruddin, “Dielectric properties for characterization of fly ash-based geopolymer binders,” Const. Build. Mat., vol. 189, pp. 19-32, Nov. 2018, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.180
[36] M. S. Basri, F. Mustapha, N. Mazlan, and M. R. Ishak, “Optimization of Rice Husk Ash‐Based Geopolymers Coating Composite for Enhancement in Flexural Properties and Microstructure Using Response Surface Methodology,” Coatings, vol. 10(2), no. 165, pp. 1-19, Feb. 2020, available at: doi:10.3390/coatings10020165
[37] A. Abolhasani, B. Samali, and F. Aslani, “Rice Husk Ash Incorporation in Calcium Aluminate Cement Concrete: Life Cycle Assessment, Hydration and Strength Development,” Sustainability, vol. 14(2), no. 1012, Jan. 2022, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14021012
[38] B. H. Abu Bakar, R. Putrajaya, and H. Abdulaziz, “Malaysian Rice Husk Ask – Improving the Durability and Corrosion Resistance of Concrete: Pre-review,” Concr. Res. Lett., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6-13, Mar. 2010.
[39] M. Amran et al., “Rice Hush Ash-Based Concrete Composites: A Review of Their Properties and Applications,” Advances in Cement-Based Composites and Novel Construction Products, vol. 11(2), no. 168, Feb. 2021, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020168
[40] A. P. Gursel, H. Maryman, and C. Ostertag, “A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of “green” concrete mixes with rice husk ash,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 112, pp. 823-836, June 2015, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.029
[41] M. Yin, X. Li, Q. Liu, and F. Tang, “Rice Husk Ash Addition to Acid Red Soil Improves the Soil Property and Cotton Seedling Growth,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1704, Feb. 2022, available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05199-7
[42] S. Kumar et al., “Recent trends in slag management & utilization in the steel industry,” Minerals & Metals Review, vol. 1, pp .94-102, Jan. 2019.
[43] A. Di Maria, M. Salman, M. Dubois, and K. Van Acker, “Life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental performance of new construction material from stainless steel slag,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 23, pp. 2091-2109, Feb. 2018, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1440-1
[44] B. Prabu, A. Shalini, and J. K. Kumar, “Rice husk ash based geopolymer concrete – A review,” Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 288-294, Jan. 2014.
[45] F. Maghool, A. Arulrajah, Y. Du, S. Horpibulsuk, and A. Chinkulkijniwat, “Environmental impacts of utilizing waste steel slag aggregates as recycled road construction materials,” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, vol. 19, pp. 949–958, May 2017, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1289-6
[46] Y. Li et al., “Environmental impact analysis of blast furnace slag applied to ordinary Portland cement production,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 120, pp. 221-230, May 2016, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.071
[47] BS 1881-116, Testing Concrete - Method for Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes, British Standards Institution (BSI0, London, 1983.