Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32451
An Application-Driven Procedure for Optimal Signal Digitization of Automotive-Grade Ultrasonic Sensors

Authors: Mohamed Shawki Elamir, Heinrich Gotzig, Raoul Zoellner, Patrick Maeder


In this work, a methodology is presented for identifying the optimal digitization parameters for the analog signal of ultrasonic sensors. These digitization parameters are the resolution of the analog to digital conversion and the sampling rate. This is accomplished though the derivation of characteristic curves based on Fano inequality and the calculation of the mutual information content over a given dataset. The mutual information is calculated between the examples in the dataset and the corresponding variation in the feature that needs to be estimated. The optimal parameters are identified in a manner that ensures optimal estimation performance while preventing inefficiency in using unnecessarily powerful analog to digital converters.

Keywords: Analog to digital conversion, digitization, sampling rate, ultrasonic sensors.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 282


[1] Fano, Robert M., and David Hawkins. ”Transmission of information: A statistical theory of communications.” American Journal of Physics 29 (1961): 793-794.
[2] Fisher, John W., Michael Siracusa, and Kinh Tieu. ”Estimation of signal information content for classification.” 2009 IEEE 13th Digital Signal Processing Workshop and 5th IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop. IEEE, 2009.
[3] Kraskov, Alexander, Harald St¨ogbauer, and Peter Grassberger. ”Estimating mutual information.” Physical review E 69, no. 6 (2004): 066138.
[4] Moon, Young-I, Balaji Rajagopalan, and Upmanu Lall. ”Estimation of mutual information using kernel density estimators.” Physical Review E 52, no. 3 (1995): 2318.
[5] Battiti, Roberto. ”Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning.” IEEE Transactions on neural networks 5, no. 4 (1994): 537-550.
[6] Peng, Hanchuan, Fuhui Long, and Chris Ding. ”Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy.” IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 27, no. 8 (2005): 1226-1238.
[7] Fleuret, Franc¸ois. ”Fast binary feature selection with conditional mutual information.” Journal of Machine learning research 5, no. Nov (2004): 1531-1555.
[8] Liu, Huawen, Jigui Sun, Lei Liu, and Huijie Zhang. ”Feature selection with dynamic mutual information.” Pattern Recognition 42, no. 7 (2009): 1330-1339.
[9] Vergara, Jorge R., and Pablo A. Est´evez. ”A review of feature selection methods based on mutual information.” Neural computing and applications 24, no. 1 (2014): 175-186.
[10] Horng, Ming-Huwi. ”Multi-class support vector machine for classification of the ultrasonic images of supraspinatus.” Expert Systems with Applications 36, no. 4 (2009): 8124-8133.
[11] Pereira, Wagner Coelho A., Andr´e V. Alvarenga, Antonio Fernando C. Infantosi, Leonardo Macrini, and Carlos E. Pedreira. ”A non-linear morphometric feature selection approach for breast tumor contour from ultrasonic images.” Computers in Biology and Medicine 40, no. 11-12 (2010): 912-918.
[12] Shekhar, Raj, and Vladimir Zagrodsky. ”Mutual information-based rigid and nonrigid registration of ultrasound volumes.” IEEE transactions on medical imaging 21, no. 1 (2002): 9-22.
[13] Prelov, Vyacheslav V., and Edward C. van der Meulen. ”Mutual information, variation, and Fano’s inequality.” Problems of Information Transmission 44, no. 3 (2008): 185-197.
[14] Yang, Sheng, and Jun Gu. ”Feature selection based on mutual information and redundancy-synergy coefficient.” Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A 5, no. 11 (2004): 1382-1391.
[15] Cooper, Matthew, and Michael Miller. ”Information gain in object recognition via sensor fusion.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multisource-Multisensor Information Fusion (Fusion’98), vol. 1, pp. 143-148. 1998.
[16] Poepperli, Maximilian, Raghavendra Gulagundi, Senthil Yogamani, and Stefan Milz. ”Capsule neural network based height classification using low-cost automotive ultrasonic sensors.” In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 661-666. IEEE, 2019.
[17] Mohamed, Mohamed-Elamir, Heinrich Gotzig, Raoul Zoellner, and Patrick Maeder. ”A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Ultrasonic Echoes in Noisy Environments.” In 2019 IEEE 89th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Spring), pp. 1-6. IEEE, 2019.
[18] Mohamed, Mohamed-Elamir, Heinrich Gotzig, Raoul Zoellner, and Patrick Maeder. ”A Machine Learning Approach for Ultrasonic Noise Suppression With Minimal Distortion” In 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonic Symposium (IUS2019), IEEE, 2019.