The Client-Supplier Relationship in Managing Innovation: Delineating Defence Industry First Mover Challenges within the Government Contract Competition
Authors: Edward Pol
All companies are confronted with the need to innovate in order to meet market demands. In so doing they are challenged with the dilemma of whether to aim to be first into the market with a new innovative product, or to deliberately wait and learn from a pioneers’ mistakes; potentially avoiding higher risks. It is therefore important to critically understand from a first mover advantage and disadvantage perspective the decision-making implications of defence industry transformation onset by an innovative paradigm shift. This paper will argue that the type of industry characteristics matter, especially when considering what role the clients play in the innovation process and what their level of influence is. Through investigation of qualitative case study research, this inquiry will focus on first mover advantages and first mover disadvantages with a view to establish practical and value-added academic findings by focusing on specific industries where the clients play an active role in cooperation with the supplier innovation. The resulting findings will help managers to mitigate risk in innovative technology introduction. A selection from several defence industry innovations is specifically chosen because of the client–supplier relationship that typically differs from traditional first mover research. In this instance, case studies will be used referencing vertical-take-off-and-landing defence equipment innovations.Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 357
 Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press
 Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., Peterson, R. A., (1992). First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions. Journal of Marketing Research. Volume 56
 Utterback, J. M. (1996). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
 Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press. p. book cover
 Porter, M. E., (1985). Technology and Competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 5 No. 3 p. 60-78 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039075 MCB UP Ltd. p.70
 Christensen, C. M., Suarez, F. F., Utterback, J. M. (1996). Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries. The international Center for Research on the Management Technology. July 1996 Sloan WP#3917 Massachusetts Institute of technology, Cambridge Massachusetts.
 Hargadon, A. (2003). How Breakthroughs Happen; The Surprising Truth about How Companies Innovate. Harvard Business School Press.
 Porter, M. E. (1979). How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy, Https://hbr.org/1979/03/how-competitive-forces-shape-strategy Harvard Business Review.
 Schilling, M. A. (2016). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York University.
 Kim, J., Lee, C., Y. (2011). Technological Regimes and the Persistence of First-Mover Advantages. Industrial and Corporate Change. Volume 20, Number 5, pages 1305–1333.
 Lieberman, M. B., Montgomery, D. B. (1987). First Mover Advantages. Research Paper Number 969. Stanford Business School.
 Christensen, C. M., Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change. Harvard Business Review.
 Ashford, N., A. (1999). Porter Stuck In 1970’s The Environment Forum. Massachusetts Institute of Technology p.31
 Lieberman, M. B., Montgomery, D. B. (1998). First-Mover (Dis) Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
 Eisenhardt, K., M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review Vol. 14, No. 4, 532 -550. Stanford University
 Yin, R. K. (1992). The Case Study Method as a Tool for Doing Evaluation. SAGE Publishing. Volume 40 issue 1.
 Mintzberg, H. (1979). An Emerging Strategy of “Direct” Research. Administrative Science Quarterly.
 Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, www.boeing.com/defense/v-22-osprey/#/gallery
 Maisel, M. D., Giulianetti, D., J., Dugan, D. C., (2000). The History of the XV Tiltrotor Research Aircraft. Monographs in Aerospace History No. 17 NASA SP-2000-4517
 Bolkcom, C., (2005). V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft, Naval History and Heritage Command – Congressional Research Service Report for Congress.
 Naval Aviation: The V-22 Osprey – Progress and Problems (1990) GAO Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives, http://archive.gao.gov/d22t8/142638.pdf
 Gertler, J., (2011). V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft: Background and Issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service.
 Moyers, A., (2007). The Long Road: AFOTEC’s Two-Plus Decades of V-22 Involvement., December 1, 2008 Airforce Operational Test and Evaluation Center United States Air Force
 Boeing V-22 Osprey Tiltrotor, Historical Snapshot, www.boeing.com/history/products/v-22-osprey.page
 V-22 Osprey Global Security. Org, www.global security.org/military/systems/aircraft/v-22-losses.htm
 Weiss, M. (2017). How to become a first mover? Mechanisms of military innovation and the development of drones. European Journal of International Security. Ludwig-Maximilians-University. Munich Germany
 V-22 Osprey Tiltrotor Aircraft Program, www.EveryCRSReport.com
 Sikorsky XR-5 (1998). Smithsonian, National Air and Space Museum https//airandspace.si.edu, nasm A19600308000
 US Army triggers competition for future long range assault aircraft competition, www.defencenews.com/land/2021/07/12/us-army-triggers-competition-for-future-long-range-assault-aircraft-competition/
 Judson, J., (December 10, 2020), Army preps for competition limited to Bell and Sikorsky for long range assault helicopter, Defense News
 Specification, Bell V-280, Bellflight.com
 Bell V-280 Valor: 3rd Generation Tiltrotor Technology Demonstrator, (2020). https://militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.php?aircraft_id=1065
 Sikorsky-Boeing SB-1 Defiant in flight with dual rotors and tail prop, Lockheed Martin, lockheedmartin.com
 Bell V-280 Valor, www.bellflight.com/products/bell-v-280
 GE positioned to deliver for U.S. Army’s Future Vertical Lift Modernization, (2019) GEAviation.com