Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Utility Analysis of API Economy Based on Multi-Sided Platform Markets Model
Authors: Mami Sugiura, Shinichi Arakawa, Masayuki Murata, Satoshi Imai, Toru Katagiri, Motoyoshi Sekiya
Abstract:
API (Application Programming Interface) economy, where many participants join/interact and form the economy, is expected to increase collaboration between information services through API, and thereby, it is expected to increase market value from the service collaborations. In this paper, we introduce API evaluators, which are the activator of API economy by reviewing and/or evaluating APIs, and develop a multi-sided API economy model that formulates interactions among platform provider, API developers, consumers, and API evaluators. By obtaining the equilibrium that maximizes utility of all participants, the impact of API evaluators on the utility of participants in the API economy is revealed. Numerical results show that, with the existence of API evaluators, the number of developers and consumers increase by 1.5% and the utility of platformer increases by 2.3%. We also discuss the strategies of platform provider to maximize its utility under the existence of API evaluators.Keywords: API economy, multi-sided markets, API evaluator, platform, platform provider.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 551References:
[1] IBM, “IBM unveils matchmaking technology to navigate API economy,” Nov. 2015.
[2] Z. Zhang, P. Nabipay, A. Odlyzko, and R. Guerin, “Interactions, competition and innovation in a service-oriented Internet: An economic model,” in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2010, pp. 1–5.
[3] A. Nagurney, D. Li, T. Wolf, and S. Saberi, “A network economic game theory model of a service-oriented Internet with choices and quality competition,” NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, vol. 14, pp. 1–25, May 2013.
[4] L.Fanti and D. Buccella, “Cournot and bertrand competition in the software industry,” Economics Research International, vol. 5, pp. 1–10, Nov. 2015.
[5] Y. Raivio and S. Luukkainen, “Mobile networks as a two-sided platform-Case Open Telco,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 6, pp. 77–89, Aug. 2011.
[6] S. Sen, R. Gu´erin, and K. Hosanagar, “Functionality-rich versus minimalist platforms: A two-sided market analysis,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 41, pp. 36–43, Sep. 2011.
[7] D. S. Evans, “The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets,” Yale Jornal on Regulation, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 325–381, 2003.
[8] K. Stanoevska-Slabeva and T. Wozniak, “Opportunities and threats by mobile platforms: The (new) role of mobile network operators,” in Proceedings of Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN). IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–6.
[9] V. Visco Comandini, “Google and multisided platform economics: what lessons for delivery services?” in Proceedings of 8th bi-annual Postal Economics Conference on E-commerce, Digital Economy and Delivery services, Apr. 2014, pp. 1–22.