Evaluation of Environmental, Technical, and Economic Indicators of a Fused Deposition Modeling Process
Additive manufacturing processes have changed significantly in a wide range of industries and their application progressed from rapid prototyping to production of end-use products. However, their environmental impact is still a rather open question. In order to support the growth of this technology in the industrial sector, environmental aspects should be considered and predictive models may help monitor and reduce the environmental footprint of the processes. This work presents predictive models based on a previously developed methodology for the environmental impact evaluation combined with a technical and economical assessment. Here we applied the methodology to the Fused Deposition Modeling process. First, we present the predictive models relative to different types of machines. Then, we present a decision-making tool designed to identify the optimum manufacturing strategy regarding technical, economic, and environmental criteria.Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 57
 Lee JY, An J, Chua CK, Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today, 7:120–133, 2017.
 Fahad M, Hopkinson N, Evaluation and comparison of geometrical accuracy of parts produced by sintering-based additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12): 3389–3394, 2017.
 Costabile G, Fera M, Fruggiero F, Lambiase A, Pham D, Cost models of additive manufacturing: a literature review. Int J Ind Eng Comput 8:263–282, 2017.
 Kellens, K, Baumers, M, Gutowski, T G., Flanagan, W, Lifset, R, Duflou, J, Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing: Mapping Application Domains and Their Environmental Implications. J of Ind Ecology 21 : 49 :68, 2017.
 Luo, Y. L. Y., Ji, Z. J. Z., Leu, M. C. and Caudill, R, Environmental performance analysis of solid freedom fabrication processes, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 1999.
 Luo, Y., Leu, M. C. and Ji, Z, Assessment of environmental performance of rapid prototyping and rapid tooling processes, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp. 783–792, 1999.
 Mognol, P., Lepicart, D. and Perry, N, Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 12 (1), pp. 26–34, 2006.
 Baumers, M., Tuck, C., Hague, R., Ashcroft, I. and Wildman, R, A comparative study of metallic additive manufacturing power consumption, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp. 278–288. 2010.
 Baumers, M., Tuck, C., Wildman, R., Ashcroft, I. and Hague, R, Energy inputs to additive manufacturing: Does capacity utilization matter?, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp. 30–40, 2010.
 Junk, S. and Côté, S, A practical approach to comparing energy effectiveness of rapid prototyping technologies, Proceedings of AEPR’12, (June), pp. 12–14 2009.
 Junk, S. and Côté, S, Influencing variables on sustainability in additive manufacturing. Offenburg - Germany: Helena Bartolo, 2013.
 Sreenivasan, R. and Bourell, D. L, Sustainability study in selective laser sintering – An energy perspective, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp. 257–265, 2009.
 Balogun, V. A., Kirkwood, N. D. and Mativenga, P. T, Direct Electrical Energy Demand in Fused Deposition Modelling, Procedia CIRP, 15, pp. 38–43, 2014.
 Le, V. T. and Paris, H, Impact of Total Build Height and Batch Size on Environmental Performance of Electron Beam Melting, Procedia CIRP. The Author(s), 69(May), pp. 112–117, 2018.
 Baumers, M., C. Tuck, R. Wildman, I. Ashcroft, E. Rosamond, and R. Hague, Transparency built-in. Energy consumption and cost estimation for additive manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Ecology 17(3): 418–431 2012.
 Le Bourhis, F., O. Kerbrat, J.-Y. Hascoet, and P. Mognol, Sustain- able manufacturing: Evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 69(9): 1927–1939, 2013.
 Xu, X., S. Meteyer,N. Perry, and Y. F. Zhao, Energy consumption model of binder-jetting AM processes. International Journal of Production Research, 2014.
 Kellens, K., E. Yasa, Renaldi, W. Dewulf, J. P. Kruth, and J. R. Duflou, Energy and resource efficiency of SLS/SLM processes. In Proceedings of the 22nd Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 8–10 August, Austin, TX, USA, 1–16, 2011a
 Kellens, K., Renaldi, W. Dewulf, J. P. Kruth, and J. R. Duflou, Environmental impact modeling of selective laser sintering pro- cesses. Rapid Prototyping Journal 20(6): 459–470, 2014.
 M. Yosofi, O. Kerbrat, P. Mognol, Energy and material flow modelling of additive manufacturing processes, Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2018, 13, 83.
 Yosofi, M.; Kerbrat, O.; Mognol, P. Additive manufacturing processes from an environmental point of view: A new methodology for combining technical, economic, and environmental predictive models. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 102, 4073–4085.
 Motaparti KP, Taylor G, Leu MC, Chandrashekhara K, Castle J, Matlack M, Experimental investigation of effects of build parameters on flexural properties in fused deposition modelling parts. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(3):207–220, 2017.
 Kim GD, Oh YT, A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 222(2):201–215, 2008.
 Byun HS, Lee KH, Determination of the optimal build direction for different rapid prototyping processes using multicriterion decision making. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 22(1):69– 80, 2006.
 Strano G, Hao L, Everson RM, Evans KE, Multi-objective optimization of selective laser sintering processes for surface quality and energy saving. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 225(9):1673–1682, 2007.
 Teitelbaum GA, Schmidt LC, Goaer Y, Examining potential design guidelines for use in fused deposition modeling to reduce build time and material volume. Int Des Eng Tech Conf Comput Inf Eng Conf 8:1–10, 2009.
 Kranz J, Herzog D, Emmelmann C, Design guidelines for laser additive manufacturing of lightweight structures in TiAl6V4. J Laser Appl 27(S14001):1–16, 2015.
 O. S. Carneiro, A. F. Silva, et R. Gomes, « Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene », Mater. Des., vol. 83, p. 768‑776, oct. 2015,
 « Rayegani et Onwubolu - 2014 - Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter.pdf ».
 M. Montero, S. Roundy, D. Odell, S.-H. Ahn, et P. K. Wright, « Material Characterization of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) ABS by Designed Experiments », p. 21, 2001.
 M. Raju, M. K. Gupta, N. Bhanot, et V. S. Sharma, « A hybrid PSO–BFO evolutionary algorithm for optimization of fused deposition modelling process parameters », J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 30, no 7, p. 2743‑2758, oct. 2019
 A. K. Sood, R. K. Ohdar, et S. S. Mahapatra, « Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts », Mater. Des., vol. 31, no 1, p. 287‑295, janv. 2010
 Boschetto A, Giordano V, Veniali F, Modelling micro geometrical profiles in fused deposition process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61(9–12):945–956, 2011.
 Boschetto A, Giordano V, Veniali F, Surface roughness prediction in fused depositionmodelling by neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2727–2742, 2013.
 Hopkinson N, Dickens P, Analysis of rapid manufacturing - using layer manufacturing processes for production. Proc InstMech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 217(1):31–40, 2003.
 BaumersM, Tuck C,Wildman R, Ashcroft, I., Rosamond E, Hague R, Combined build-time, energy consumption and cost estimation for direct metal laser sintering. Proc of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, USA, pp 278–288, 2012.
 Manogharan G, Wysk RA, Harrysson OLA, Additive manufacturing-integrated hybrid manufacturing and subtractive processes: economic model and analysis. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29(5):473–488, 2016.
 Durgun I, Ertan R, Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement ofmechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):228–23.5, 2016.
 C. Hodonou , O. Kerbrat, M. Balazinski1, M. Brochu, Process selection charts based on economy and environment: subtractive or additive manufacturing to produce structural components of aircraft. Int J Int des manuf. 14, 861–873, 2020.
 Yosofi, M.; Kerbrat, O.; Mognol, P. Framework to Combine Technical, Economic and Environmental Points of View of Additive Manufacturing Processes. Procedia CIRP 2018, 69, 118–123.