Container Chaos: The Impact of a Casual Game on Learning and Behavior
This paper explores the impact that playing a casual game can have on a player's learning and subsequent behavior. A casual mobile game, Container Chaos, was created to teach undergraduate students about the carbon footprint of various disposable beverage containers. Learning was tested with a short quiz, and behavior was tested by observing which beverage containers players choose when offered a drink and a snack. The game was tested multiple times, under a variety of different circumstances. Findings of these tests indicate that, with extended play over time, players can learn new information and sometimes even change their behavior as a result. This has implications for how other casual games can be used to teach concepts and possibly modify behavior.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12489866Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 750
 Anderton, K. (2019). Research Report Shows How Much Time We Spend Gaming. Forbes, March 21, 2019. Retrieved September 18, 2019 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinanderton/2019/03/21/research-report-shows-how-much-time-we-spend-gaming-infographic/#732d743e3e07.
 Anastas, P. T., and Zimmerman, B. (2003). Design through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering. Environmental Science and Technology 37(5):94A-101A.
 Murphy, C. F., Allen, D., Allenby, B., Davidson, C. I., Hendrickson, C. and Matthews, H. S. (2009). Sustainability in Engineering Education and Research at US Universities. Environmental Science and Technology 43:5558-5564.
 Mont, O. and Plepys, A. (2008). Sustainable Consumption Progress: Should We Be Proud or Alarmed? Journal of Cleaner Production 16:531-537.
 Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8(3):239-260.
 Blumenstein, D.T., and C. Saylan. (2007). The failure of environmental education (and how we can fix it). PLoS Biology 5(5):e120. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio0050120.
 Dochy, F., Segers, M., van de Bosche, P. and Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction 13(5):533-568.
 Brodie, L. (2009). eProblem-based learning: problem-based learning using virtual teams. European Journal of Engineering Education 34(6): 497-509.
 Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing: A comp rehensive guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences, Pfeiffer.
 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.) Ed. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
 Kolodner, J. L. (2004). The learning sciences: Past, present, future. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ-: 34-39.
 Olson, S. (Ed.) (2013). Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning: Summary of a Forum, The National Academies Press.
 Buckley, M., Kershner, H., Schindler, K., Alphonce, C. and Braswell, J. (2004). Benefits of using socially-relevant projects in computer science and engineering education. Conference Proceedings, SIGCSE '04, Norfolk, VA. March 3-7. pp. 482-486.
 Adams, R., D. Evangelou, L. English, A.D. de Figueiredo, N. Mousoulides, A.L. Pawley, C. Schlifellite, R. Stevens, M. Svinicki, J.M. Trenor, and D.M. Wilson. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education 100(1):48-88.
 Segalas, J., Ferrer-Balas, D. and Mulder, K.F. (2010). What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 18:275-284.
 Honey, M.A. and Hilton, M. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. The National Academies Press.
 Price, C. A., Gean, K., Christensen, C. G., Beheshti, E., Pernot, B., Segovia, G., ... & Ward, P. (2016). Casual games and casual learning about human biological systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 111-126.
 Nelson, B. C., Bowman, C. D., Bowman, J. D., Cortés, L. E. P., Adkins, A., Escalante, E., ... & Su, M. (2019). Ask Dr. Discovery: the impact of a casual mobile game on visitor engagement with science museum content. Educational Technology Research and Development 1-18.
 Gustafsson, A., Bång, M. and Svahn, M. (2009). Power explorer: a casual game style for encouraging long term behavior change among teenagers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, 182-189.
 USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2019). National Overview: Facts and Figures on Materials, Wastes and Recycling. Retrieved on September 18, 2019 from https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/national-overview-facts-and-figures-materials#NationalPicture.
 Michael Gold. 2018. A Long-Awaited Ban on Foam, and Other New Laws in New York in 2019. New York Times, December 31, 2018.
 McDaniel, P. (2019). It's crunch time for California's plan to phase out single-use plastics by 2030. Los Angeles Times, September 5, 2019.
 Hocking, M. B. (1991). Paper versus Polystyrene: A Complex Choice. Science: 251:504-505.
 Lave, L. B., Cobas-Flores, E., Hendrickson, C. T. and McMichael, F. C. (1995). Using Input-Output Analysis to Estimate Economy-wide Discharges. Environmental Science and technology 29(9): 420A-426A.
 Woods, L. and Bakshi, B. R. (2014). Reusable versus Disposable Cups Revisited: Guidance in Life Cycle Comparisons Addressing Scenario, Model, and Parameter Uncertainties for the US Consumer. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19:931-940.
 PRe (2013). SimaPro Databases and Methods. Available online at http://www.pre-sustainability.com/databases.
 John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194, 4-7.