Accessibility and Visibility through Space Syntax Analysis of the Linga Raj Temple in Odisha, India

Authors: S. Pramanik

Abstract:

Since the early ages, the Hindu temples have been interpreted through various Vedic philosophies. These temples are visited by pilgrims which demonstrate the rituals and religious belief of communities, reflecting a variety of actions and behaviors. Darsana— a direct seeing, is a part of the pilgrimage activity. During the process of Darsana, a devotee is prepared for entry in the temple to realize the cognizing Truth culminating in visualizing the idol of God, placed at the Garbhagriha (sanctum sanctorum). For this, the pilgrim must pass through a sequential arrangement of spaces. During the process of progress, the pilgrims visualize the spaces differently from various points of views. The viewpoints create a variety of spatial patterns in the minds of pilgrims coherent to the Hindu philosophies. The space organization and its order are perceived by various techniques of spatial analysis. A temple, as examples of Kalinga stylistic variations, has been chosen for the study. This paper intends to demonstrate some visual patterns generated during the process of Darsana (visibility) and its accessibility by Point Isovist Studies and Visibility Graph Analysis from the entrance (Simha Dwara) to The Sanctum sanctorum (Garbhagriha).

Keywords: Hindu Temple Architecture, Point Isovist, space syntax analysis, visibility graph analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3669160

References:

[1] V. Bharne and K. Krusche, Rediscovering the Hindu Temple: The Sacred Architecture and Urbanism of India. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014., pp. 04–05
[2] A. Hardy, The Temple Architecture of India. Chichester, Wiley, 2007.
[3] P. Brown, Indian Architecture, Buddhist and Hindu Periods, Kiran Book Agency, Delhi, 2010., pp 85
[4] N. C. Panda and K. M. Suresh, Temple Architecture of Orissa, Bharatiya Kala Prakashan, 2014.pp.03
[5] A. Turner, Depthmap, 6.05 edition, London: University college of London.
[6] G. Franz and J.M. Wiener, Exploring isovist based corelates of spatial behavior and experience, 5th International Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings, TU Delft, 2005, pp.503-17.
[7] A. Turner and A. Penn, Making isovist syntactic: isovist integration analysis, 2nd International Symposium on Space Syntax, University de Brasilia, Brazil, 1999, Proceddings, pp.1-9.
[8] A. Turner, M. Doxa, D. O’Sullivan, A. Penn, from isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, pp.103-21.
[9] B. Hillier and J. Hanson, “The logic of space,” The social logic of space, Cambridge University press, pp. 52–81.
[10] B. Hillier, Between social physics and phenomenology: explorations towards an urban synthesis, 5th International Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings, TU Delft, pp.3-23.
[11] M. Searle and G. M. Lukken, Semiotics and Church Architecture, Liturgia Condenda, Leuven:Peeters, 1993
[12] M.L. Benedikt, To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields, Environment and Planning B, pp. 47-65
[13] B. Hillier, Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. CreateSpace, 2015.
[14] E. T. Hall, The Hidden Dimension, Leonardo, vol. 6, no. 1. pp. 94.
[15] O. Newman, Creating Defensible Space, DIANE Publishing, 1966.