Application of Seismic Isolators in Kutahya City Hospital Project Utilizing Double Friction Pendulum Type Devices
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Application of Seismic Isolators in Kutahya City Hospital Project Utilizing Double Friction Pendulum Type Devices

Authors: Kaan Yamanturk, Cihan Dogruoz

Abstract:

Seismic isolators have been utilized around the world to protect the structures, nonstructural components and contents from the damaging effects of earthquakes. In Structural Engineering, seismic isolation is used for protecting buildings and its vibration-sensitive contents from earthquakes. Seismic isolation is a passive control system that lowers effective earthquake forces by utilizing flexible bearings. One of the most significant isolation systems is seismic isolators. In this paper, double pendulum type Teflon coated seismic isolators utilized in a city hospital project by Guris Construction and Engineering Co. Inc, located in Kutahya, Turkey, have been investigated. Totally, 498 seismic isolators were applied in the project. These isolators are double friction pendulum type seismic isolation devices. The review of current practices is also examined in this study. The focus of this study is related to the application of passive seismic isolation systems for buildings as practiced in Kutahya City Hospital Project. Based on the study, the acceleration at the top floor will be 0.18 g and it will decrease 0.01 g in every floor. Therefore, seismic isolators are very important for buildings located in earthquake zones.

Keywords: Maximum considered earthquake, moment resisting frame, seismic isolator, seismic design.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3455615

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 675

References:


[1] Gordon P. Warn and Keri L. Ryan, “A Review of Seismic Isolation for Buildings: Historical Development and Research Needs”, Buildings Journal 2012, 2, pp. 300-325
[2] Touaillon, J. Improvement in Buildings. U.S. Patent 99,973, 15 February 1870.
[3] Constantinou, M.C.; Whittaker, A.S; Kalpakidis, Y.; Fenz, D.M.; Warn, G.P. Performacne of Seismic Isolation Hardware under Service and Seismic Loading; Technical Report MCEER-07-0012; Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo: Buffalo, NY, USA, 2008.
[4] Luis Andrade and John Tuxworth, Seismic Protection of Structures with Modern Base Isolation Technologies, Green Leaf Engineers, 2002
[5] Kalantari S.M, Naderpour H. and Hoseini Vaez S.R., “Investigation of Base-Isolator Type Selection On Seismic Behavior Of Structures Including Story Drifts And Plastic Hinge Formation,” The 14 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.
[6] Torunbalci N and. Ozpalanlar G, “Earthquake Response Analysis Of Mid-Story Buildings Isolated With Various Seismic Isolation Techniques,” The 14 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China
[7] Chandak N. R., “Effect of Base Isolation on the Response of Reinforced Concrete Building Journal of Civil Engineering Research 2013, 3(4): 135-142
[8] Ashish R. Akhare, Tejas R.Wankhade, “Seismic Performance of RC Structure Using Different Base Isolator,” IJESRT, vol. 3, Issue-5, May 2014, pp-724-729
[9] Cancellara D, De Angelis F.,” Assessment and dynamic nonlinear analysis of different base isolation systems for a multistorey RC building irregular in plan”. Comput Struct, 2016