River Stage-Discharge Forecasting Based on Multiple-Gauge Strategy Using EEMD-DWT-LSSVM Approach

Authors: Farhad Alizadeh, Alireza Faregh Gharamaleki, Mojtaba Jalilzadeh, Houshang Gholami, Ali Akhoundzadeh

Abstract:

This study presented hybrid pre-processing approach along with a conceptual model to enhance the accuracy of river discharge prediction. In order to achieve this goal, Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition algorithm (EEMD), Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Mutual Information (MI) were employed as a hybrid pre-processing approach conjugated to Least Square Support Vector Machine (LSSVM). A conceptual strategy namely multi-station model was developed to forecast the Souris River discharge more accurately. The strategy used herein was capable of covering uncertainties and complexities of river discharge modeling. DWT and EEMD was coupled, and the feature selection was performed for decomposed sub-series using MI to be employed in multi-station model. In the proposed feature selection method, some useless sub-series were omitted to achieve better performance. Results approved efficiency of the proposed DWT-EEMD-MI approach to improve accuracy of multi-station modeling strategies.

Keywords: River stage-discharge process, LSSVM, discrete wavelet transform (DWT), ensemble empirical decomposition mode (EEMD), multi-station modeling.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3346710

References:

[1] Kisi, O. and Cobenar, M. (2009). “Modeling River Stage-Discharge Relationships Using Different Neural Network Computing Techniques.” Clean, Vol. 37 No. 2, PP. 160 – 169.
[2] Ghorbani, M. A., Khatibi, R., Goel, A., Fazeli Fard, M. H. and Azani, A. (2016) “Modeling river discharge time series using support vector machine and artificial neural networks.” Environmental Earth Sciences, Vol. 75, PP. 685.
[3] Shannon, C.E. (1948). “The mathematical theory of communications.” I and II. Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, PP. 379–423.
[4] Roushangar, K. and Alizadeh. F. (2018). “Entropy-based analysis and regionalization of annual precipitation variation in Iran during 1960–2010 using ensemble empirical mode decomposition.” Journal of Hydroinformatics, Vol. 20 No. 2, PP. 468-485.
[5] Noori, R., Karbassi, A. R., Moghaddamnia, A. et al. 2011. “Assessment of input variables determination on the SVM model performance using PCA, Gamma test and forward selection techniques for monthly stream flow prediction.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 401, PP. 177-189.
[6] Aussem, A., Campbell, J. and Murtagh, F. (1998). “Wavelet-based feature extraction and decomposition strategies for financial forecasting.” Journal of Computational Finance, Vol 6, No. 2, PP. 5-12.
[7] Nourani, V., Komasi, M. and Alami, M. T. (2013). “Geomorphology-based genetic programming approach for rainfall–runoff modeling.” Journal of Hydroinformatics, Vol. 15 No. 2 PP. 427-445.
[8] Farajzadeh, J. and Alizadeh, F. (2018). “A hybrid linear–nonlinear approach to predict the monthly rainfall over the Urmia Lake watershed using wavelet-SARIMAX-LSSVM conjugated model.” Journal of Hydroinformatics, Vol 20, No. 1, PP. 246-262.
[9] Wu, Z. H. and Huang, N. E. (2009). “Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise assisted data analysis method.” Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, Vol. 1, PP.1–14.
[10] Wang, W-C., Xu, D-M., Chau, K. W. and Chen, S. (2013). “Improved annual rainfall-runoff forecasting using PSO–SVM model based on EEMD.” Journal of Hydroinformatics, Vol. 15 No. 4 PP. 1377-1390.
[11] Adamowski, J. and Chan, H.F. (2011). “A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 407, PP. 28–40.