Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32578
Exergy Analysis of Vapour Compression Refrigeration System Using R507A, R134a, R114, R22 and R717

Authors: Ali Dinarveis


This paper compares the energy and exergy efficiency of a vapour compression refrigeration system using refrigerants of different groups. In this study, five different refrigerants including R507A, R134a, R114, R22 and R717 have been studied. EES Program is used to solve the thermodynamic equations. The results of this analysis are shown graphically. Based on the results, energy and exergy efficiencies for R717 are higher than the other refrigerants. Also, the energy and exergy efficiencies will be decreased with increasing the condensing temperature and decreasing the evaporating temperature.

Keywords: Energy, exergy, refrigeration, temperature, thermodynamic.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 574


[1] ASHRAE standard 34-2007: Designation and safety classification of refrigerants. ASHRAE, Atlanta GA; 2007.
[2] H. C. Bayrakc, A. E. Ozgur, Energy and exergy analysis of vapor compression refrigeration system using pure hydrocarbon refrigerants. Int J Energy Res, 33 (2009), pp. 1070–1075.
[3] M. Mohanraja, S. Jayaraj, C. Muraleedharan, Environment friendly alternatives to halogenated refrigerants – a review. Int J Greenh Gas Control, 3 (2009), pp. 108–119.
[4] Domanski PA, Didion DA. Impact of refrigerant property uncertainties on prediction of vapour compression cycle performance. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg; 1987.
[5] M. Bhatti, Historical look at chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants ASHRAE Trans (Part 1) (1999), pp. 1186–1206.
[6] Gaggioli RA. Available energy and exergy. International Journal of Applied Thermodynamics 1998;1:1–8.
[7] Wark KJ. Advanced thermodynamics for engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995.
[8] Bejan A. Advanced engineering thermodynamics. New York: Wiley; 1988.
[9] Moran MJ. Availability analysis: a guide to efficient energy use. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1982.
[10] Bejan A. Entropy generation through heat and fluid flow. New York: Willey; 1982.
[11] Torres-Reyes E, Picon-Nune ZM, Cervantesortari DE, Gortari J. Exergy analysis and optimization of a solar assisted heat pump. Energy 1998;23:337–44.
[12] Bejan A. Theory of heat transfer-irreversible refrigeration plants. International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer 1989;32:1631–9.
[13] Wall G. Optimization of refrigeration machinery. International Journal of Refrigeration 1990;14:336–40.
[14] Akau RL, Schoenhals RJ. The second law efficiency of a heat pump system. Energy 1980;5:853–63.
[15] Chen J, Chen X, Wu C. Optimization of the rate of exergy output of a multistage endoreversible combined refrigeration system. Exergy
[16] Kaygusuz K, Ayhan T. Exergy analysis of solar assisted heat pump systems for domestic heating. Energy 1993;18:1077–85.
[17] Torres-Reyes E, Cervantes DE, Gortari J. Optimal performance of an irreversible solar assisted heat pump. Exergy 2001;1:107–11.
[18] Leidenfrost W, Lee KH, Korenic KH. Conservation of energy estimated by second law analysis of power-consuming process. Energy 1980;5:47–61.
[19] A. S. Dalkilic, S. Wongwises, A performance comparison of vapour-compression refrigeration system using various alternative refrigerants, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 37 (2010) 1340–1349.
[20] R. Cabello, E. Torrella, J. Navarro-Esbri, Experimental evaluation of a vapour compression plant performance using R134a, R407C and R22 as working fluids, Appl. Therm. Eng. 24 (2004) 1905–1917.
[21] J. Navarro-Esbri, R. Cabello, E. Torrella, Experimental evaluation of the internal heat exchanger influence on a vapour compression plant energy efficiency working with R22, R134a and R407C, Energy 30 (2005) 621–636.
[22] HC. Bayrakci, AE. Ozgur, Energy and exergy analysis of vapor compression refrigeration system using pure hydrocarbon refrigeration, Int. J. Energy Res. 2009; 33:1070–1075.