Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33114
Shaft Friction of Bored Pile Socketed in Weathered Limestone in Qatar
Authors: Thanawat Chuleekiat
Abstract:
Socketing of bored piles in rock is always seen as a matter of debate on construction sites between consultants and contractors. The socketing depth normally depends on the type of rock, depth at which the rock is available below the pile cap and load carrying capacity of the pile. In this paper, the review of field load test data of drilled shaft socketed in weathered limestone conducted using conventional static pile load test and dynamic pile load test was made to evaluate a unit shaft friction for the bored piles socketed in weathered limestone (weak rock). The borehole drilling data were also reviewed in conjunction with the pile test result. In addition, the back-calculated unit shaft friction was reviewed against various empirical methods for bored piles socketed in weak rock. The paper concludes with an estimated ultimate unit shaft friction from the case study in Qatar for preliminary design.Keywords: Piled foundation, weathered limestone, shaft friction, rock socket, pile load test.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2643575
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1099References:
[1] F. H. Kulhawy and K.K. Phoon, “Drilled shaft side resistance in clay soil to rock,” in Design and Performance of Deep Foundations: Piles and Piers in Soil and Soft Rock (GSP 38), ed., P.P Nelson, T.D. Smith and E.C. Clukey, New York: ASCE, 1993, pp. 172–183.
[2] C. A. Neoh, “Design and construction of pile foundation in limestone formation,” Journal of Institute of Engineers, Malaysia, vol. 59, no. 1 1998, pp. 23–29.
[3] Y. C. Tan, “Pile Foundation design and construction practice: a Malaysian consultant’s perspective,” in CIE-IEM Joint Seminar on Geotechnical Engineering, Yilan, Taiwan, August 2009.
[4] F. Rausche, G.G. Goble and G. Likins, “Dynamic determination of pile capacity,” Jnl Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 367–383.
[5] J. H. Hwang, J. C. C. Li and N. Liang, “On methods for interpreting bearing capacity from pile load test,” Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 34, no. 1 2003, pp. 27–29.
[6] K. Terzaghi, Theoretical Soil Mechanics. John Wiley, New York, 1943.
[7] F. M. Fuller and H.E. Hoy, “Pile load tests including quick load test method, conventional methods and interpretations” in High. Res. Rec.333 1971, pp. 74–86.
[8] M. T. Davisson “High capacity piles,” in Proc. Lecture Series on Innovations in Foundation Construction, ASCE, Illinois Section, Chicago, 1972.
[9] F. K. Chin, “Estimated of the ultimate load of pile from test not carried to failure,” in Proc. 2nd S.E. Asian Conference Soil Mechanic Foundation and Engineering, Singapore, 1970, pp. 81–92.
[10] A. Hirany and F. H. Kulhawy, “Interpretation of load tests on drilled shaft I: axial compression,” in Foundation Engineering: Current Principals and Practices, GSP22, ed., F. H. Kulhaway, ASCE, New York: ASCE, 1989, pp. 1132-1149.
[11] Rowe and Armitage, “Theoretical solutions for axial deformation of drilled shafts in rock,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1987
[12] Horvath, R. G. and Kenney, T. C. “Shaft Resistance of Rock-Socketed Drilled Piers,” Proceedings of Symposium on Deep Foundations, ASCE, 1979, pp. 182-214.
[13] Reese, L. C. and O’Neill, M. W., “Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and Design Methods,” Report No. FHWA-HI-88-042, FHWA, 1988, Washington, DC., pp. 564.