Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32601
Effect of Reynolds Number and Concentration of Biopolymer (Gum Arabic) on Drag Reduction of Turbulent Flow in Circular Pipe

Authors: Kamaljit Singh Sokhal, Gangacharyulu Dasoraju, Vijaya Kumar Bulasara


Biopolymers are popular in many areas, like petrochemicals, food industry and agriculture due to their favorable properties like environment-friendly, availability, and cost. In this study, a biopolymer gum Arabic was used to find its effect on the pressure drop at various concentrations (100 ppm – 300 ppm) with various Reynolds numbers (10000 – 45000). A rheological study was also done by using the same concentrations to find the effect of the shear rate on the shear viscosity. Experiments were performed to find the effect of injection of gum Arabic directly near the boundary layer and to investigate its effect on the maximum possible drag reduction. Experiments were performed on a test section having i.d of 19.50 mm and length of 3045 mm. The polymer solution was injected from the top of the test section by using a peristaltic pump. The concentration of the polymer solution and the Reynolds number were used as parameters to get maximum possible drag reduction. Water was circulated through a centrifugal pump having a maximum 3000 rpm and the flow rate was measured by using rotameter. Results were validated by using Virk's maximum drag reduction asymptote. A maximum drag reduction of 62.15% was observed with the maximum concentration of gum Arabic, 300 ppm. The solution was circulated in the closed loop to find the effect of degradation of polymers with a number of cycles on the drag reduction percentage. It was observed that the injection of the polymer solution in the boundary layer was showing better results than premixed solutions.

Keywords: Drag reduction, shear viscosity, gum Arabic, injection point.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 665


[1] P.S. Virk, Drag reduction fundamentals, AIChE J. 21 (1975) 625–656. doi:10.1002/aic.690210402.
[2] J. Lumley, I. Kobu, Turbulent drag reduction by polymer additives: a survey, in: Influ. Polym. Addit. Veloc. Temp. Fields ({IUTAM} Symp. Ess. 1984), 1985.
[3] B. (Ed. . Gampert, The Influence of Polymer Additives on Velocity and Temperature Fields, 1985. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82632-0.
[4] P. Diamond, J. Harvey, J. Katz, D. Nelson, P. Steinhardt, Drag reduction by polymer additives, 3481(1992). 02/07/2015).
[5] J.M.J. Den Toonder, M. a. Hulsen, G.D.C. Kuiken, F.T.M. Nieuwstadt, Drag reduction by polymer additives in a turbulent pipe flow: numerical and laboratory experiments, J. Fluid Mech. 337 (1997) 193–231. doi:10.1017/S0022112097004850.
[6] P.K. Ptasinski, B.J. Boersma, F.T.M. Nieuwstadt, M. a. Hulsen, B.H. a. a. Van Den Brule, J.C.R. Hunt, Turbulent channel flow near maximum drag reduction: simulations, experiments and mechanisms, J. Fluid Mech. 490 (2003) 251–291. doi:10.1017/S0022112003005305.
[7] C.M. White, M.G. Mungal, Mechanics and Prediction of Turbulent Drag Reduction with Polymer Additives, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40 (2008) 235–256. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102156.
[8] M.D. Warholic, H. Massah, T.J. Hanratty, Influence of drag-reducing polymers on turbulence: effects of Reynolds number, concentration and mixing, Exp. Fluids. 27 (1999) 461–472. doi:10.1007/s003480050371.
[9] W.D. McComb, L.H. Rabie, Local drag reduction due to injection of polymer solutions into turbulent flow in a pipe, AIChE J. 28 (1982) 547–557.
[10] K.S. Sokhal, D. Gangacharyulu, V.K. Bulasara, Effect of guar gum and salt concentrations on drag reduction and shear degradation properties of turbulent flow of water in a pipe, Carbohydr. Polym. 181 (2018) 1017–1025. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.048.
[11] C.H. Hong, H.J. Choi, K. Zhang, F. Renou, M. Grisel, Effect of salt on turbulent drag reduction of xanthan gum, Carbohydr. Polym. 121 (2015) 342–347. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.015.
[12] W. Brostow, H.E.H. Lobland, T. Reddy, R.P. Singh, L. White, Lowering mechanical degradation of drag reducers in turbulent flow, J. Mater. Res. 22 (2007) 56–60. doi:10.1557/jmr.2007.0003.
[13] N. Le Brun, I. Zadrazil, L. Norman, A. Bismarck, C.N. Markides, On the drag reduction effect and shear stability of improved acrylamide copolymers for enhanced hydraulic fracturing, Chem. Eng. Sci. 146 (2016) 135–143. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2016.02.009.
[14] I. Zadrazil, A. Bismarck, G.F. Hewitt, C.N. Markides, Shear layers in the turbulent pipe flow of drag reducing polymer solutions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 72 (2012) 142–154. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.12.044.
[15] J.L. Lumley, Drag reduction in turbulent flow by polymer additives, J. Polym. Sci. 7 (1973) 263–290. (19/01/2017).
[16] C. Kim, J.. Kim, K. Lee, H.. Choi, M.. Jhon, Mechanical degradation of dilute polymer solutions under turbulent flow, Polymer (Guildf). 41 (2000) 7611–7615. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00135-X.
[17] A.S. Pereira, E.J. Soares, Polymer degradation of dilute solutions in turbulent drag reducing flows in a cylindrical double gap rheometer device, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2012.05.001.
[18] S. Tamano, H. Ikarashi, Y. Morinishi, K. Taga, Drag reduction and degradation of nonionic surfactant solutions with organic acid in turbulent pipe flow, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 215 (2015) 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.10.011.
[19] C.H. Hong, K. Zhang, H.J. Choi, S.M. Yoon, Mechanical degradation of polysaccharide guar gum under turbulent flow, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 16 (2010) 178–180. doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2009.09.073.
[20] H.J. Choi, C.A. Kim, J.I. Sohn, M.S. Jhon, Exponential decay function for polymer degradation in turbulent drag reduction, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 69 (2000) 341–346. doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00080-X.