Comparison of Newton Raphson and Gauss Seidel Methods for Power Flow Analysis
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Comparison of Newton Raphson and Gauss Seidel Methods for Power Flow Analysis

Authors: H. Abaali, T. Talbi, R.Skouri

Abstract:

This paper presents a comparative study of the Gauss Seidel and Newton-Raphson polar coordinates methods for power flow analysis. The effectiveness of these methods are evaluated and tested through a different IEEE bus test system on the basis of number of iteration, computational time, tolerance value and convergence.

Keywords: Convergence time, Gauss-Seidel Method, Newton-Raphson Method, number of iteration, power flow analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1474601

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2553

References:


[1] A. Shahriari, H. Mokhlis, Ab Halim Abu Bakar “Critical Reviews Of Load Flow Methods For Well, Ill And Unsolvable Condition” Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 3, , pp. 144–152, 2012
[2] G. Leoniopoulos “Efficient starting point of load-flow equations” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 16, Issue 6, pp. 419-422, December 1994
[3] H. S. Huang and C. N. Lu “Vector implementations of fast decoupled and Gauss-Seidel load flows” Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 355-358, 1995
[4] Abilio Manuel Variz, Vander Menengoy da Costa, José Luiz R. Pereira, Nelson Martins “Improved representation of control adjustments into the Newton–Raphson power flow” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 25, Issue 7, pp. 501-513, September 2003
[5] W. Hubbi and A. Refsum “Starting algorithm and modification for Newton-Raphson load-flow method” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 3, ,pp. 166-172, July 1983
[6] S. Mallick, D.V. Rajan, S.S. Thakur, P. Acharjee, S.P. Ghoshal “Development of a new algorithm for power flow analysis” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems Vol. 33, pp. 1479–1488, 2011
[7] H.Abaal, E.Talbi and R.Skouri “A Comparison of Newton Raphson and Gauss Seidel Methods for Power Flow Analysis” 1st International Symposium on Computational Mathematics and Engineering Sciences. Faculty of Sciences and Techniques Errachidia, Morocco, Mar 3-6, 2016