Evaluation of Wind Fragility for Set Anchor Used in Sign Structure in Korea
Recently, damage to domestic facilities by strong winds and typhoons are growing. Therefore, this study focused on sign structure among various vulnerable facilities. The evaluation of the wind fragility was carried out considering the destruction of the anchor, which is one of the various failure modes of the sign structure. The performance evaluation of the anchor was carried out to derive the wind fragility. Two parameters were set and four anchor types were selected to perform the pull-out and shear tests. The resistance capacity was estimated based on the experimental results. Wind loads were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation method. Based on these results, we derived the wind fragility according to anchor type and wind exposure category. Finally, the evaluation of the wind fragility was performed according to the experimental parameters such as anchor length and anchor diameter. This study shows that the depth of anchor was more significant for the safety of structure compare to diameter of anchor.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1316237Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 384
 G. Carpenter, “Typhoon Maemi loss report 2003,” Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd., Asia Pacific Practice, Tower Place, London, EC3R 5BU, 16, 2003.
 P. J. Vickery, P. F. Skerlj, J. Lin, L. A. Twisdale Jr, M. A. Young, and F. M. Lavelle, “HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: Damage and loss estimation,” Natural Hazards Review, 2006, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 94-103.
 American Society of Civil Engineers, “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (Vol. 7),” American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.
 B. R. Ellingwood, and P. B. Tekie, “Wind load statistics for probability-based structural design,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 1999, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 453–463.
 K. H. Lee, and D. V. Rosowsky, “Fragility assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions,” Engineering Structures, 2005, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 857–868.
 K. Porter, “Beginner’s guide to fragility, vulnerability, and risk,” Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, pp. 235–260.
 M. Shinozuka, M. Q. Feng, J. Lee, and T. Naganuma, “Statistical analysis of fragility curves,” Journal of engineering mechanics, 2003, vol. 126, no. 12, pp. 1224–1231.