Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30067
Teacher Culture Inquiry of Classroom Observation at an Elementary School in Taiwan

Authors: Tsai-Hsiu Lin

Abstract:

Three dimensions of teacher culture hinder educational improvement: individualism, conservatism and presentism. To promote the professional development of teachers, these three aspects in teacher culture should be eliminated. Classroom observation may be a useful method of eliminating individualism. The Ministry of Education in Taiwan has attempted to reduce the isolation of teachers to promote their professional growth. Because classroom observation discourse varies, teachers are generally unwilling to allow their teaching to be observed. However, classroom observations take place in the country in the form of school evaluations. The main purpose of this study was to explore the differences in teachers’ conservatism, individualism and presentism after classroom observations had been conducted at an elementary school in Taiwan. The research method was a qualitative case study involving interviews with the school principal, the director of academic affairs, and two classroom teachers. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) Educators in different positions viewed classroom observations differently; (2) The classroom teachers did not highly value classroom observation; (3) There was little change in the teachers’ conservatism, individualism and presentism after classroom observation.

Keywords: Classroom observation, Lortie’s Trinity, teacher culture, teacher professional development

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1315841

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF

References:


[1] D.C. Lortie, Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago, 1975.
[2] A. Hargreaves, “Presentism, individualism, and conservatism: the legacy of Dan Lortie’s Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study,” Curriculum Inquiry, vol.40 no.1, pp.143-155, 2010.
[3] D. H. Hargreaves, Interpersonal Relations and Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.
[4] A. Merc, “The potential of general classroom observation: Turkish EFL teachers’ perceptions, sentiments, and readiness for action,” Journal of Education and Training Studies, vol.3 no.4, pp.193-205, 2015.
[5] M. Hismanoglu and S. Hismanoglu, English Language Teachers’ Perceptions of Educational Supervision in Relation to Their Professional Development: A Case Study of Northern Cyprus, Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), vol.4 no.1, pp.16-34, 2010.
[6] Education World, Teachers Observing teachers: A professional development tool for every school. 2016 (http://www.educationworld).
[7] D. DeZuren, “Evaluating teaching through peer classroom observation,” in P. Seldin (ed.) Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing. 1999, pp.70-96.
[8] A. Hargreaves and P. Woods, “Introduction,” in A. Hargreaves and P. Woods (eds.) Classrooms $ Staffrooms: The Sociology of Teachers and Teaching. Milton Keynes: Open University Press., pp.1-11, 1984.
[9] TMOE,http://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=55BD57743E88E277.
[10] J. A. Marsh, The political dynamics of district reform: The form and fate of the Los Angeles public school choice initiative. Teachers College Record, vol.118, 54p, 2016.