The Role of Paraphrase in Interpreting Students’ Writing

Authors: Maya Lisa Aryanti, S. S. M. Hum

Abstract:

To improve students’ skill, writing is the most challenging skill to be developed. The reason is that besides helping the students to develop their skill, this activity also helps them to express themselves. This paper depicts how paraphrasing is very helpful to interpret students’ writing. Syntactic units, used tenses and meanings will indeed change once the writings were paraphrased. The objectives of this research are to reveal the inappropriate structure of syntactic units, to show what types of sentences the students often make, and to show how paraphrasing can help to infer the message. The methodology of this research is descriptive qualitative research. In addition, theories of linguistics are also included. This includes theory of Syntax to describe syntactic units and tenses and theory of Semantics to describe theories of meaning and how paraphrasing works. The theories of general linguistics, grammar and writing are also provided to support the theories of Syntax and Semantics. The results of this research are concerned with how the message is received in the end. The message written in the students’ essay is not clear because of the improper structure of syntactic units and use of incorrect of tenses. The students tend to use simple sentences, compound sentences and complex sentences with a few mistakes in their writing. In addition, they tend to create unnecessary phrases. The last point is that this research shows how paraphrase works to attain complete meaning of a sentence.

Keywords: Paraphrase, meanings, syntactic units and tenses.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132589

References:

[1] Azar, Understanding and Using English Grammar, 2nd ed. New Jersey, United States of America: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1989.
[2] Burling, Robbins, Pattern of Language, Academic Press, 1992.
[3] Carnie, Andrew, Syntax, A Generative Introduction, 2nd ed. Australia: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
[4] Chaer, Abdul, Drs., Linguistik Umum. Jakarta, PT Rineka Cipta, 2003
[5] Deterding and Poedjosoedarmo, The Grammar of English, Morphology and Syntax for English Teachers in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Prentice Hall Pearson Education Asia Pte Ltd, 2001.
[6] Frank, Marcella, Modern English, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1972.
[7] Gatherer, W.A, The Student’s Handbook of Modern English, Jakarta: PT Gramedia, 1986.
[8] Griffiths, Patrick, An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Ltd, 2006.
[9] Hofmann, Th.R, Realms of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics, New York: Longman Group Limited, 1993.
[10] Miller, Jim, An Introduction to English Syntax. Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press, 2002.
[11] O’Grady, Dobrovolsky, Katamba, Contemporary Linguistics, An Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc, 1989.
[12] Oshima and Hogue, Introduction to Academic Writing, 3rd ed. New York, United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc, 2007.
[13] Punch, Keith F, Introduction to Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1998.
[14] Ritchie, Lewis and Jane, Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, Great Britain: The Cromwell Press Ltd, 2003.
[15] Sugiyono, Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: CV Alfabeta, 2007.
[16] Tannen, Deborah, Gender and Discourse, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
[17] Traugott and Pratt, Linguistics for Students of Literature, New York, United States of America: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich, Inc, 1980.