Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32579
A Robotic Cube to Preschool Children for Acquiring the Mathematical and Colours Concepts

Authors: Ahmed Amin Mousa, Tamer M. Ismail, M. Abd El Salam


This work presents a robot called Conceptual Robotic Cube, CR-Cube. The robot can be used as an educational tool for children from the age of three. It has a cube shape attached with a camera colours sensor. In addition, it contains four wheels to move smoothly. The researchers prepared a questionnaire to measure the efficiency of the robot. The design and the questionnaire was presented to 11 experts who agreed that the robot is appropriate for learning numbering and colours for preschool children.

Keywords: CR-Cube, robotic cube, conceptual robot, conceptual cube, colour concept, early childhood education.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1073


[1] Mousa, A. A., & El-Salam, M. A. (2016). Employing QR Code as an Effective Educational Tool for Quick Access to Sources of Kindergarten Concepts. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10(7), 2325-2328.
[2] Mousa, A. A., & El Salam, M. A. (2016). A Proposed Program for Postgraduates in Egypt to Acquire the Skills and Techniques for Producing Concept Cartoons for Kindergarten Children. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10(7), 2208-2212.
[3] Toh, L. P. E., Causo, A., Tzuo, P. W., Chen, I. M., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). A Review on the Use of Robots in Education and Young Children. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 148-163.
[4] Beran, T. N., Ramirez-Serrano, A., Kuzyk, R., Fior, M., & Nugent, S. (2011). Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child–robot interaction. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 69(7–8), 539-550.
[5] Wei, C. W., Hung, I. C., Lee, L., & Chen, N. S. (2011). A Joyful classroom learning system with robot learning companion for children to learn mathematics multiplication. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 11-23. Kozima & Nakagawa, 2007
[6] Shimada, M., Kanda, T., & Koizumi, S. (2012). How can a social robot facilitate children’s collaboration? Social Robotics, 98–107.
[7] Kahn Jr, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., Ruckert, J. H., & Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303-314.
[8] Highfield, K. (2010). Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 22-27.
[9] Chen, N. S., Quadir, B., & Teng, D. C. (2011). A Novel approach of learning English with robot for elementary school students. In M. Chang et al. (Eds.), Edutainment 2011, LNCS 6872 (pp. 309–316). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[10] Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J. J. (2013). A Review of the applicability of robots in education. Technology for Education and Learning, 1, 1-7.
[11] Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A Systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988.
[12] Barak, M., & Zadok, Y. (2009). Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. International Journal Technology & Design Education, 19(3), 289-307.
[13] Varney, M. W., Janoudi, A., Aslam, D. M., & Graham, D. (2012). Building young engineers: TASEM for third graders in Woodcreek Magnet Elementary School. IEEE Trans Education, 55(1), 78-82.
[14] Chang, C. W., Lee, J. H., Chao, P. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 13–24.
[15] Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment.Journal Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229-243.
[16] Whittier, L. E., & Robinson, M. (2007). Teaching evolution to non-English proficient students by using LEGO robotics. American Secondary Education, 35(3), 19-28.
[17] Williams, D. C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M. J., & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201-216.
[18] Sugimoto, M. (2011). A Mobile mixed-reality environment for children’s storytelling using a handheld projector and a robot. IEEE Trans Learning Technologies, 4(3), 249-260.
[19] Slangen, L., Keulen, H. V., & Gravemeijer, K. (2011). What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 449–469.‏
[20] Bobtsov, A. A., Pyrkin, A. A., Kolyubin, S. A., Shavetov, S. V., Chepinskiy, S. A., Kapitanyuk, Y. A., ... & Surov, M. O. (2011). Using of lego mindstorms nxt technology for teaching of basics of adaptive control theory. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 44(1), 9818-9823.