Impact of Flexibility on Residential Buildings in Egypt

Authors: Aly Mohamed El Husseiny, Azza Ezz Abdelkader

Abstract:

There is a critical thin line between freedom of choice and randomness. The distance between imagination and perception and between perception and execution varies depending on numerous factors. While in developed areas residents have the opportunity and abilities to build flexible homes, residents in developing areas create their own dwellings in informal settlements, even though none of them is comfortable at home in the long run. This paper explores three factors: What residents really need, what they do with limited flexibility, and what they do when there are no limits, as in the case of informal settlements. This paper studies alteration to residential buildings and how they connect to the changes in people’s lifecycle in all past cases. This study also examines all approaches to flexibility, focusing on a social approach. The results of this study are based on three practical studies: Interviews with residents in an informal settlement (Eshash Mahfouz in Minya in Egypt), a civil study of buildings in a middle-class district, and a survey of residents from many countries, including Egypt, and interviews with a number of them to determine residents’ needs and the extent of renovations they made or would like to make to their homes.

Keywords: Flexibility, housing, freedom of choice, social, changes, residents.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1131223

References:

[1] Ahamed, M. H. (1988). Flexibility As An Approach To The Design Of Urban Housing Units In Egypt. Assiyt, Egypt: not published.
[2] Amira Osman, P. H. (2011). An Adaptability Assessment Tool (AAT) for Sustainable Building Transformation: Towards an Alternative Approach to Residential Architecture in South Africa. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 83-90). Boston, MA, USA: Ball State University.
[3] Ayman H. A. Elhag, A. O. (2011). The Small-Scale Private Rental Market in Two African Contexts: Appropriated Space and Missed Opportunities in the Sudan. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 445-451). Boston, MA, USA: Ball state university.
[4] Corey T. Griffin, A. P. (2011). Ordering the Structure of Light Wood Framed Row Houses to Sustainably Accommodate Change: San Francisco’s Sunset District as a Cautionary Tale. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 146-154). Boston, MA, USA: Ball state university.
[5] Dinh Quoc Phuong. (2011). The Impact of ‘Informal’ Building Additions on Interior/Exterior Space in Hanoi’s Old. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 131-138). Boston, MA, USA: Ball State University.
[6] Eric Bellin, T. U. (2011). Life’s Net
[or] a Framework for Growth and Change. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 41-46). Boston, MA, USA: Ball state university.
[7] Happy Santosa, P. S. (2011). Sustainable Homes: Adaptation of Informal Settlements to Environmental Change. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 352-356). Boston, MA, USA: Ball State University.
[8] Jorge I. Andrade Narváez, A. R. (2011). Sustainable Incremental Support (S.I.S.). Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 386-392). Boston, MA, USA: Ball State University.
[9] Kazunobu Minami, P. D. (2011). Analysis of Long Term Occupancy Records of Public Housing in Japan. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 287-293). Boston, MA, USA: Ball state university.
[10] Kronenburg, R. (2007). Flexible: Architecture that Responds to Change. london: Laurence King Publishing.
[11] Kurzbein, A. (2011). The Inhabitants’ Reinterpretation of Spatial Structures in Hay Hassani, Casablanca. Stockholm: Uppsatser Från Kulturgeografiska Institutionen.
[12] Moharram, L. A. (1980). a method for evaluating the flexibility of floor plans in multi-story housing. pennsylvania, USA: university of Pennsylvania.
[13] Nasamat Abdel-Kader, S. E. (2013). Rethinking New Communities Development - with Reference to Egypt’s 40 Years Experience. 39th World Congress on Housing Science. Milan, Italy: IAHS 2013.
[14] Peder Duelund Mortensen Associate Professor, T. R., & Architect. (2011). Situation-Based Housing: Urban Dwellings Suitable for Changing Life Conditions. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 100-106). Boston, MA, USA: Ball state university.
[15] steiner, h. a. (2009). Beyond archigram: the structure of circulation.
[16] Vipparti, A. (2011). Adapting to a culture of ‘transience’ - design methodology for the 21st century city. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 280-286). Ahmedabad, India: CEPT University.
[17] Yoshiro Morita, T. P. (2011). How Dwellings Expanded: Case Study on Dojunkai Wooden Multi-Family Houses in Shin-Yamashita. Architecture in the Fourth Dimension (pp. 113-122). Boston, MA, USA: Ball state university.
[18] Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.