Measuring E-Learning Effectiveness Using a Three-Way Comparison
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Measuring E-Learning Effectiveness Using a Three-Way Comparison

Authors: Matthew Montebello

Abstract:

The way e-learning effectiveness has been notoriously measured within an academic setting is by comparing the e-learning medium to the traditional face-to-face teaching methodology. In this paper, a simple yet innovative comparison methodology is introduced, whereby the effectiveness of next generation e-learning systems are assessed in contrast not only to the face-to-face mode, but also to the classical e-learning modality. Ethical and logistical issues are also discussed, as this three-way approach to compare teaching methodologies was applied and documented in a real empirical study within a higher education institution.

Keywords: E-learning effectiveness, higher education, teaching modality comparison.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130135

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1404

References:


[1] B. Bloom, "The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring," Educational Researcher, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4-16, 1984.
[2] L. A. Halawia, R. V. McCarthy, and S. Piresc, "An Evaluation of E-Learning on the Basis of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Education for Business, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 374-380, 2009.
[3] D. Vidakovic, J. Bevis, and M. Alexander, "Bloom's taxonomy in developing assessment items," Journal of Online Mathematics and Its Applications, Mar. 2003.
[4] C. Kartha, "Learning business statistics: Online vs traditional," The Business Review, Cambridge, vol. 5, no. 1, 2006.
[5] A. A. Skylar, K. Higgins, R. Boone, and P. Jones, "Distance education: An exploration of alternative methods and types of instructional media in teacher education," Journal of Special Education Technology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 25-34, 2005.
[6] P. Suanpang and P. Petocz, "E-learning in Thailand: An analysis and case study," International Journal on E-Learning, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 415-439, 2006.
[7] G. Piccoli, R. Ahmad, and B. Ives, "Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary asssessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training," MIS Quarterly, vol. 25, pp. 401-427, 2001.
[8] AP, "Research on the Effectiveness of Online Learning - A Compilation of Research on Online Learning," Texas, USA, 2011.
[9] B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones, "Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies," Center for Technology in Learning, Washington, 2010.
[10] Chan, A., Chow, K., & Jia, W. (2003). A Framework for Evaluation of Learning Effectiveness in Online Courses. In W. e. Zhou, IXWL2003, LNCS 2783 (pp. 383-395). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
[11] R.M. Bernard et al., "How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature," Review of Educational Research, pp. 379–439, 2004.
[12] D. Xu and S. Smith Jaggars, "Online and Hybrid Course Enrollment and Performance in Washington State Community and Technical Colleges," Online Education and Instructional Technology, 2011.
[13] H. Johnson and M. Cuellar Mejia, "Online Learning and Student Outcomes in California’s Community Colleges," California, USA, 2014.
[14] C., Neuhauser, "Learning Style and Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction," American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 99-113, 2002.
[15] M. Montebello, "Enhancing e-learning through the merging of e-portfolios, social networks and artificial intelligence," in 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, 2016.
[16] D. Xu, W.W. Huang, H. Wang, and J. Heales, "Enhancing e-learning effectiveness using an intelligent agent-supported personalised virtual learning environment: An empirical study," Information & Management, pp. 430-440, 2014.
[17] E. Aeiad and F. Meziane, "An adaptable and personalised e-learning system based on free web resources," in NLDB 2015, LNCS 9103. Switzerland: Springer International, 2015, pp. 293-299.
[18] Ined. (2016, January) iClass Learning Management System. (Online). http://iclass.ined.uitm.edu.my/ (Accessed 1 Oct. 2016).
[19] OUP. (2016, February) Oxford Universtiy Press. (Online). https://www.oupchina.com.hk/elt/events/20160305-iclass-seminar/iclass_brochure_elt_feb-2016.pdf (Accessed 1 Oct. 2016).
[20] F. D. Davis, "User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 475-487, 1993.
[21] Q. Ma and L. Liu, "The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings," Journal of Organisational User Computations, pp. 59-72, 2004.
[22] D. Kim and H. Chang, "Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance model," International Journal Med. Inform., pp. 790-800, 2007.
[23] A. K. Yarbrough and T. B. Smith, "Technology acceptance among physicians: A new take on TAM," Med. Care Res. Rev., pp. 650-672, 2007.
[24] M. Masrom, "Technology Acceptance Model and E-learning, "in 12th International Conference on Education, Brunei, 2007.
[25] M. G. Meany-Daboul, E. M. Roscoe, J. C. Bourret, and W. H. Ahearn, "A comparison of momentary time sampling and partial-interval recording for evaluating functional relations," Journal of Applied Behavioural Analysis, pp. 501-514, 2007.
[26] E. H. Joy and F. E. Garcia, "Measuring Learning Effectiveness: A new look at no-significance-difference findings," Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33-39, 2000.
[27] M. R. Domenic, "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Learning as Opposed to Traditional Classroom Delivered Instruction," 2005.
[28] S. Wilkinson, "Focus Group Methodlogy," in Focus Group Research. Los Angeles: Sage, 2012, pp. 115-131.
[29] L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education (6th edition). USA: Routledge, 2007.
[30] A. Al-Adwan, A. Al-Adwan, and J. Smedley, "Exploring students acceptance of e-learning using TAM in Jordanian universities," International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 4-18, 2013.
[31] P Baxter and S. Jack, "Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers," The Qualitative Report, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 544-559, 2008.
[32] P. Burnard, P. Gill, K. Stewart, E. Treasure, and B. Chadwick, "Analysing and presenting qualitative data," British Dental Journal, vol. 204, pp. 429-432, 2008.
[33] V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology," Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 77-101, 2006.
[34] J. Thomas and A. Harden, "Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews," Social Science Research Unit, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, London, 2007.