Influence of Model Hydrometeor Form on Probability of Discharge Initiation from Artificial Charged Water Aerosol Cloud
Hypothesis of the lightning initiation on the arrays of large hydrometeors are in the consideration. There is no agreement about the form the hydrometeors that could be the best for the lightning initiation from the thundercloud. Artificial charged water aerosol clouds of the positive or negative polarity could help investigate the possible influence of the hydrometeor form on the peculiarities and the probability of the lightning discharge initiation between the thundercloud and the ground. Artificial charged aerosol clouds that could create the electric field strength in the range of 5-6 kV/cm to 16-18 kV/cm have been used in experiments. The array of the model hydrometeors of the volume and plate form has been disposed near the bottom cloud boundary. It was established that the different kinds of the discharge could be initiated in the presence of the model hydrometeors array – from the cloud discharges up to the diffuse and channel discharges between the charged cloud and the ground. It was found that the form of the model hydrometeors could significantly influence the channel discharge initiation from the artificial charged aerosol cloud of the negative or positive polarity correspondingly. Analysis and generalization of the experimental results have shown that the maximal probability of the channel discharge initiation and propagation stimulation has been observed for the artificial charged cloud of the positive polarity when the arrays of the model hydrometeors of the cylinder revolution form have been used. At the same time, for the artificial charged clouds of the negative polarity, application of the model hydrometeor array of the plate rhombus form has provided the maximal probability of the channel discharge formation between the charged cloud and the ground. The established influence of the form of the model hydrometeors on the channel discharge initiation and from the artificial charged water aerosol cloud and its following successful propagation has been related with the different character of the positive and negative streamer and volume leader development on the model hydrometeors array being near the bottom boundary of the charged cloud. The received experimental results have shown the possibly important role of the form of the large hail particles precipitated in thundercloud on the discharge initiation.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130069Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 791
 V. A. Rakov, F. Rachidi, “Overview of recent progress in lightning research and lightning protection,” IEEE Transact. On Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 428-442, 2009.
 J. R. Dwyer, V. A. Uman, “The physics of lightning,” Phys. Rep., vol. 534, pp. 147-241, 2014.
 A. V. Gurevich, K. P. Zybin, and R. A. Roussel-Dupre, "Runaway electron mechanism of air breakdown and preconditioning during a thunderstorm," Phys. Lett. A, vol. 165, pp. 463-468, 1992.
 J. A. Crabb and J. Latham, “Corona from colliding drops as a possible mechanism for the triggering of lightning,” Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., vol. 100, pp. 191-202, 1974.
 M. D. Nguyen and S. Michnovsky, “On the initiation of lightning discharge in a cloud. 2. The lightning initiation on precipitation particles,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 101, pp. 26675–26680, 1996.
 L. P. Babich, E. I. Bochkov, T. Neubert, “The role of charged ice hydrometeors in lightning initiation,” J. of Atmos. and Solar—Terr. Phys., vol. 154, pp. 43–46, 2017.
 A. V. Gurevich, A. Karashtin, “Runaway breakdown and hydrometeors in lightning initiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 110, no. 18, 2013.
 A. Dubinova, C. Rutjes, U. Ebert, S. Buitink, O. Scholten, and T. N. G. Trinh, “Prediction of lightning inception by large ice particles and extensive air showers,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 115, 2015.
 D. Petersen, M. Bailey, J. Hallett, and W. Beasley, “Laboratory investigation of corona initiation by ice crystals and its importance to lightning,” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., vol. 141, pp. 1283-1293, 2014.
 V. Mazur, C. D. Taylor, D. A. Petersen, “Simulating electrodeless discharge from a hydrometeor array,” J. of Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres,” vol. 120, no. 20, pp. 10879-10889, 2015.
 A. G. Temnikov, A. V. Orlov, L. L. Chernensky, V. P. Pisarev, "Effect of model hydrometeors on the development of discharge from an artificial cloud of charged aqueous aerosol," Tech. Phys. Lett., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 441-443, 2007.
 V. Mazur, C. D. Taylor, D. A. Petersen, “Simulation of lightning initiation from hydrometeors,” in 2015 Proc. of Asia-Pacific Intern. Conf. on Lightning, Nagoya. Japan.
 A. G. Temnikov, A. V. Orlov, V. N. Bolotov, Y. V. Tkach, "Studies of the parameters of a spark discharge between an artificial charged water-aerosol cloud and the ground," Tech. Phys., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 868-875, 2005.
 A. G. Temnikov, “Using of artificial clouds of charged water aerosol for investigations of physics of lightning and lightning protection,” IEEE Conference Publications: Lightning Protection (ICLP), 2012 International Conference on, 6344279, 2012.
 E. M. Bazelyan, Y. P. Raizer, Lightning Physics and Lightning Protection. IoP Publishing, Bristol and New York, 2000.
 A. G. Temnikov, “Dynamics of electric field formation inside the artificially charged aerosol cloud and in space near its boundaries,” in 2003 Proc. 12th Intern. Confer. on Atmospheric Electricity, Versal, France.
 N. Pineda, T. Rigo, J. Montanyà, O. A. van der Velde, “Charge structure analysis of a severe hailstorm with predominantly positive cloud-to-ground lightning,” Atmos. Res., vol. 178–179, pp. 31–44, 2016.
 A. Nag, V. A. Rakov, “Some inferences on the role of lower positive charge region in facilitating different types of lightning,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 36, L05815, 2009.
 T. Wu, Y. Takayanagi, T. Funaki, S. Yoshida, T. Ushio, Z. Kawasaki, T. Morimoto, M. Shimizu, “Preliminary breakdown pulses of cloud-to-ground lightning in winter thunderstorms in Japan,” J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., vol. 102, pp. 91-98, 2013.