Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30135
Mechanical Behavior of Sandwiches with Various Glass Fiber/Epoxy Skins under Bending Load

Authors: Emre Kara, Metehan Demir, Şura Karakuzu, Kadir Koç, Ahmet F. Geylan, Halil Aykul

Abstract:

While the polymeric foam cored sandwiches have been realized for many years, recently there is a growing and outstanding interest on the use of sandwiches consisting of aluminum foam core because of their some of the distinct mechanical properties such as high bending stiffness, high load carrying and energy absorption capacities. These properties make them very useful in the transportation industry (automotive, aerospace, shipbuilding industry), where the "lightweight design" philosophy and the safety of vehicles are very important aspects. Therefore, in this study, the sandwich panels with aluminum alloy foam core and various types and thicknesses of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) skins produced via Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM) technique were obtained by using a commercial toughened epoxy based adhesive with two components. The aim of this contribution was the analysis of the bending response of sandwiches with various glass fiber reinforced polymer skins. The three point bending tests were performed on sandwich panels at different values of support span distance using a universal static testing machine in order to clarify the effects of the type and thickness of the GFRP skins in terms of peak load, energy efficiency and absorbed energy values. The GFRP skins were easily bonded to the aluminum alloy foam core under press machine with a very low pressure. The main results of the bending tests are: force-displacement curves, peak force values, absorbed energy, collapse mechanisms and the influence of the support span length and GFRP skins. The obtained results of the experimental investigation presented that the sandwich with the skin made of thicker S-Glass fabric failed at the highest load and absorbed the highest amount of energy compared to the other sandwich specimens. The increment of the support span distance made the decrease of the peak force and absorbed energy values for each type of panels. The common collapse mechanism of the panels was obtained as core shear failure which was not affected by the skin materials and the support span distance.

Keywords: Aluminum foam, collapse mechanisms, light-weight structures, transport application

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127860

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 839

References:


[1] K. B. Shin, J. Y. Lee, S.H. Cho, "An experimental study of low-velocity impact responses of sandwich panels for Korean low floor bus", Composite Structures, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 228-240,2008.
[2] J. Banhart, C. Schmoll, U. Neumann, “Light-weight aluminium foam structures for ships”, in Proc. Conf. Materials in Oceanic Environment (Euromat ’98), Lisbon, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 55–63.
[3] V. Crupi, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, “Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: honeycomb vs. foam”, Marine Structures, vol. 30, pp. 74 – 96, 2013.
[4] W. J. Cantwell, G. R. Villanueva, “The high velocity impact response of composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures”, Composite Science and Technology, vol. 64, pp. 35-54, 2004.
[5] J. Banhart, “Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams”, Progress in Material Science, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 559–632, 2001.
[6] H. P. Degischer, B. Kriszt, Handbook of cellular metals: production, processing, applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2002, ch. 4.
[7] K. Mohan, T. H. Yip, S. Idapalapati, Z. Chen, "Impact response of aluminum foam core sandwich structures", Materials Science and Engineering:A, vol. 529, pp. 94-101, 2011.
[8] M. F. Ashby, A. G. Evans, N. A. Fleck, L. J. Gibson, J. W. Hutchinson, H. N. G. Wadley, Metal foams: a design guide. Boston: Butterworth- Heinemann, 2000.
[9] L. J. Gibson, M. F. Ashby, Cellular solids: structure and properties. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1997.
[10] G. Reyes, “Mechanical behavior of thermoplastic FML-reinforced sandwich panels using an aluminum foam core: experiments and modelling”, Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, vol. 12, pp. 81 – 96, 2010.
[11] E. Kara, V. Crupi, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, H. Aykul, “Low velocity impact response of glass fiber reinforced aluminium foam sandwich”, in Proc. of 15th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM15), Venice, 2012, pp. 1-8.
[12] Z. Sun, J. Jeyaraman, S. Sun, X. Hu, "Carbon-fiber aluminum-foam sandwich with short aramid-fiber interfacial toughening", Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 43, no. 11, 2059-2064, 2012.
[13] V. Crupi, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, "Low velocity impact strength of sandwich materials", Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 409-426, 2011.
[14] V. Crupi, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, "Computed tomography analysis of damage in composites subjected to impact loading", Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 17, pp. 32-41, 2011.
[15] V. Crupi, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, "Collapse modes in aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading", International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 43, pp. 6-15, 2012.
[16] J. L. Yu, X. Wang, Z. G. Wei, E. H. Wang, "Deformation and failure mechanism of dynamically loaded sandwich beams with aluminium foam core”, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 28, pp. 331-347, 2003.
[17] T. M. McCormack, R. Miller, O. Kesler, L. J. Gibson, “Failure of sandwich beams with metallic foam cores”, International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 38, pp. 4901–4920, 2001.
[18] H. Bart-Smith, J. Hutchinson, A. Evans, “Measurement and analysis of the structural performance of cellular metal sandwich construction”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1945–1963, 2001.
[19] J. Yu, E. Wang, J. Li, Z. Zheng, “Static and low-velocity impact behaviour of sandwich beams with closed-cell aluminum foam core in three-point bending”, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 35 , no. 8, pp. 885–894, 2008.
[20] K. Mohan, Y. T. Hon, S. Idapalapati, H. P. Seow, “Failure of sandwich beams consisting of alumina face and aluminum foam core in bending”, Materials Science and Engineering:A, vol. 409, pp. 292–301, 2005.
[21] C. Chen, A. M. Harte, N. A. Fleck, “The plastic collapse of sandwich beams with a metallic foam core”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1483–1506, 2001.
[22] Y. Shenhar, Y. Frostig, E. Altus, “Stresses and failure patters in the bending of sandwich beams with transversely flexible cores and laminated composite skins”, Composite Structures, vol. 35, pp. 143–152, 1996.
[23] M. Kampner, J. L. Grenestedt, “On using corrugated skins to carry shear in sandwich beams”, Composite Structures, vol. 85, pp. 139–148, 2007.
[24] O. Kesler, L. J. Gibson, “Size effects in metallic foam core sandwich beams”, Materials Science and Engineering:A, vol. 326, no. 2, pp. 228–234, 2002.
[25] V. Crupi, R. Montanini, “Aluminium foam sandwiches collapse modes under static and dynamic three-point bending”, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 34, pp. 509 – 521, 2007.
[26] J. Baumeister, J. Banhart, M. Weber, “Aluminium foams for transport industry”, Materials & Design, vol. 18, pp. 217-220, 1997.