Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30135
An Experience Report on Course Teaching in Information Systems

Authors: Carlos Oliveira

Abstract:

This paper is a criticism of the traditional model of teaching and presents alternative teaching methods, different from the traditional lecture. These methods are accompanied by reports of experience of their application in a class. It was concluded that in the lecture, the student has a low learning rate and that other methods should be used to make the most engaging learning environment for the student, contributing (or facilitating) his learning process. However, the teacher should not use a single method, but rather a range of different methods to ensure the learning experience does not become repetitive and fatiguing for the student.

Keywords: Educational practices, experience report, IT in education, teaching methods.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127525

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 613

References:


[1] D. M. M. Leão. Paradigmas contemporâneos de educação: escola tradicional e escola construtivista. Cadernos de pesquisa, 107, p. 187–206. 1999. (in Portuguese).
[2] M. G. N. Mizukami. Ensino: as abordagens do processo. EPU. 1986. (in Portuguese).
[3] D. Saviani. Escola e democracia. 25a ed. 1991. (in Portuguese).
[4] F. Becker. O que é construtivismo. Revista de educação AEC, Brasília, 21(83): p. 7 - 15. 1992. (in Portuguese).
[5] B. Freitag. Aspectos filosóficos e sócio-antropológicos do construtivismo pós-piagetiano–i. GROSSI, EP, BORDIM, J. Construtivismo pós-piagetiano: um novo paradigma de aprendizagem. Petrópolis: Vozes, p. 26–34. 1993. (in Portuguese).
[6] J. Piaget and B. Inhelder. "psychologie de l'enfant (La)." (1975).
[7] W. B. Barbe, M. N. Milone, R. H. Swassing. Teaching through modality strengths: Concepts and practices. Zaner-Bloser. 1988.
[8] S. Messick. The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational psychologist, 19(2):59–74. 1984.
[9] R. M. Felder, B. A. Soloman. Index of learning styles. 1991.
[10] V. Lindemann. Estilos de aprendizagem: buscando a sinergia. 2008. (in Portuguese).
[11] R. M. Felder, R. Brent. Understanding student differences. Journal of engi-neering education, 94(1), p. 57–72. 2005.
[12] B. Tucker. The flipped classroom. Education next, 12(1). 2012.
[13] F. G. Vargas. Sala de aula invertida. EI! Ensino Inovativo, Volume Especial. 2015. (in Portuguese).
[14] J. Kirriemuir, A. McFarlane. Literature review in games and learning. bristol: Futurelab. 2004.
[15] R. Savi, V. R. Ulbricht. Jogos digitais educacionais: benefícios e desafios. RENOTE, 6(1). 2008. (in Portuguese).
[16] S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, L. Nacke. From game design ele-ments to gamefulness: defining gamification. Em Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, p. 9 - 15. ACM. 2011.
[17] T. Classe, R. Araujo. Gamificação para participação social em processos públicos: Mapeamento sistemático. Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Colaborativos (SBSC), p. 130–137. 2015. (in Portuguese).
[18] D. T. Sato, H. Corbucci, M. V. Bravo. Coding dojo: An environment for learning and sharing agile practices. In Agile, 2008. AGILE’08. Conference, pages 459–464. IEEE. 2008.