Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30124
The Challenges for Engineers to Change the Construction Method in Brazil

Authors: Yuri B. Cesarino, Vinícius R. Domingues, Darym J. F. Campos

Abstract:

Developing countries have some restrains towards the adoption of new technologies and construction methods. Some nations, such as Brazil, still use conventional construction methodologies, knowing its lesser cost-effectiveness. This research has been conducted to demonstrate how industrialized construction methods should be implemented in Brazil, especially in times of need. Using the common sense among different authors with different perspectives, it is clear that the second method is more suitable for construction development because of its great advantages. However, it is unlikely for this process to be adopted in the country as a result of several social-economic restraints. Nonetheless, Brazilian engineers have a major challenge ahead of them, and it will take more than creativity to solve such an issue.

Keywords: Brazilian engineers, construction methods, industrialized construction, infrastructure.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1126868

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 886

References:


[1] S. Azhar, M. Y. Lukkad, and I. Ahmad, “An investigation of critical factors and constraints for selecting modular construction over conventional stick-built technique” International Journal of Construction Education and Research, vol. 9, 2013, pp. 203-225.
[2] M. L. De La Torre, “A review and analysis of modular construction practices” Theses and Dissertations, 1994. Paper 275.
[3] L. Genasci “Infrastructure: Brazil, the world cup and Olympics” Americas Quarterly, 2012. Retrieved from americanasquarterly.org.
[4] F. C. Hadipriono, and R. L. Sierakowski “Concrete construction problems in far east Asian countries”. Journal of Performance of Construction Facilities, vol. 2, nº 3, p.22644.
[5] Y. J. Kim “Interviewer: Yuri Bessa Cesarino”. University of Colorado, Denver, 2014, US.
[6] C. Kenny. “Transport construction, corruption and developing countries”. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal., vol. 29, 2009, p. 21-41.
[7] M. P. Morais, B. O. Cruz, and C. W. A. Oliveira, “Residential segregation and social exclusion in Brazilian housing markets” IPEA Discussion Paper 951. Brasilia, IPEA 2003.
[8] S. A. Mahayuddin, and W. A. Z. Zaharuddin, “Quantification of waste in conventional construction” International Journal of Environment Science and Developing, vol. 4, 2013, nº 3.
[9] R. Navon, “Economics benefits of lightweight versus conventional construction methods” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 121, 1995, p.27-36.
[10] G. Ofori, “Construction in developing countries” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 25, 2007, p. 1-6.
[11] V.W.Y. Tam, C.M, Tam, S.X. Zeng, C.Y. William, “Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction” Building and Environment, vol.42, 2007, p. 3642-3654.
[12] H. R. Thomas, “2000 Peurifoy lecture: Construction practices in developing countries” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 128, 2002, p.1-7.
[13] H. Voordijk, “Contemporary issues in construction in developing countries” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 30, 2012, p. 331-333.
[14] J. Wells, “Informality in the construction sector in developing countries” Construction Management and Economics, vol.25, 2007, p. 87-93.