Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30124
Internal and External Factors Affecting Teachers’ Adoption of Formative Assessment to Support Learning

Authors: Kemal Izci

Abstract:

Assessment forms an important part of instruction. Assessment that aims to support learning is known as formative assessment and it contributes student’s learning gain and motivation. However, teachers rarely use assessment formatively to aid their students’ learning. Thus, reviewing the factors that limit or support teachers’ practices of formative assessment will be crucial for guiding educators to support prospective teachers in using formative assessment and also eliminate limiting factors to let practicing teachers to engage in formative assessment practices during their instruction. The study, by using teacher’s change environment framework, reviews literature on formative assessment and presents a tentative model that illustrates the factors impacting teachers’ adoption of formative assessment in their teaching. The results showed that there are four main factors consisting personal, contextual, resource-related and external factors that influence teachers’ practices of formative assessment.

Keywords: Assessment practices, formative assessment, teachers, factors for use of formative assessment.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1126103

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2420

References:


[1] Butt, G. (2010). Making assessment matter. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
[2] Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers' hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany: SUNY Press.
[3] National Research Council. (2007). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
[4] American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Blueprints for reform: Science, mathematics, and technology education, Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
[5] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5, 7–74.
[6] Wiliam, D. (2007). Content then process: Teacher learning communities in the service of formative assessment. In D. B. Reeves (Ed.) Ahead of the curve: The power of assessment to transform teaching and learning (pp. 183-204). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
[7] Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1-11.
[8] Stiggins, R. (2010). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In Andrade, H., & Cizek, G. (Eds.) (2010). Handbook of formative assessment (pp.233-250) New York: Routledge.
[9] Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic
[10] Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[11] Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
[12] Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133-149.
[13] Gioka, O. (2008). Teacher or assessor? Balancing the tensions between formative and summative assessment in science teaching. In A. Havnes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 145-156). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
[14] Marsh, C. J. (2007) A critical analysis of the use of formative assessment in schools. Education Resource Policy Practice. 6:25-29.
[15] Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18–24.
[16] Adamson, B. (2011). Embedding assessment for learning. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 197-203). New York, NY: Springer.
[17] Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
[18] McMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers' classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x
[19] Box, C. (2008). Formative Assessment: Patterns, personal practice assessment theories, and impact on student achievement and motivation in science (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved June 20 from http://dspace.lib.ttu.edu/bitstream/handle/2346/9299/Box_Mary_diss.pdf?sequence=1
[20] Leung, C. (2004). Developing formative teacher assessment: Knowledge, practice and change, Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(1), 19–41.
[21] Tierney, R. D. (2006). Changing practices: Influences on classroom assessment. Assessment in Education, 13(3), 239–264. DOI: 10.1080/09695940601035387
[22] Willis, J. (2008, December). Assessment for learning: A sociocultural approach. Paper presented at the meeting of Australian Association for Research in Education, Queensland, Australia. Retrieved June 20 from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29323/1/29323.pdf
[23] Yung, B. H. W. (2006). Assessment reform in science: Fairness and fear. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
[24] Buck, G. A., & Trauth-Nare, A. E. (2009). Preparing teachers to make the formative assessment process integral to science teaching and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 475-494. DOI 10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y
[25] Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer
[26] Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2005). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: A case-study of a whole-school approach. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 193-206.
[27] Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 39–54. DOI: 10.1080/0969594042000333904
[28] Lee, C., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Studying changes in the practice of two teachers developing assessment for learning. Teacher Development, 9(2), 265-283.
[29] Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102-119). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan
[30] Flaitz, J. (2011). Assessment for learning: US perspectives. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 33-47). New York, NY: Springer.
[31] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Eds.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage
[32] Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 140-145.
[33] Berry, R. (2010). Teachers’ orientations towards selecting assessment strategies. New Horizons in Education, 58(1), 96–107.
[34] Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 301-318.
[35] Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 347-363.
[36] Towndrow, P. A., Tan, A. L., Yung, B. H., & Cohen, L. (2010). Science teachers’ professional development and changes in science assessment practices: what are the issues? Research in Science Education, 40, 117-132. doi:10.1007/s11165- 008-9103-z.
[37] Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
[38] Sutton, R. (2010). Making formative assessment the way the school does business: the impact and implications of formative assessment for teachers, students and school leaders. In A. Hargreaves, M. Fullan, A. Lieberman, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Change (2nd ed., pp.883-899). New York, NY: Springer.
[39] Sach, E. (2011) Teachers and testing: an investigation into teachers’ perceptions of formative assessment. Educational Studies, DOI:10.1080/03055698.2011.598684
[40] Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., & Stobart, G. (2011). Engaging and empowering teachers in innovative assessment practice. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 105-121). New York, NY: Springer.
[41] James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Professional learning as a condition for assessment for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 27–43). London: Sage.
[42] Remesal, A. (2007). Educational reform and primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: The Spanish instance, building upon Black and Wiliam (2005). The Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 27 – 38.
[43] Chow, A., & Leung, P. (2011). Assessment for Learning in Language Classrooms. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 135-154). New York, NY: Springer.
[44] Jones, J., & Webb, M. (2006). Assessment for learning (AfL) across the school: A case study in whole school capacity building. Paper presented at the British educational research association annual conference, Warwick, UK. Retrieved June 23 from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09695940903075925
[45] Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–76.
[46] Wilson-Thompson, B. (2005). Factors influencing teachers’ choice and use of tasks for formative assessment of mathematics in grades 2-6 (Master’s thesis). Retrieved June 13 from http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/1441
[47] Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2004) The formative purpose: assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Eds.) Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability: 103rd yearbook of the national society for the study of education (2nd ed., pp. 20-50), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[48] Hall, K., & Harding, A. (2002). Level descriptions and teacher assessment in England: towards a community of assessment practice. Educational Research, 44(1), 1–15.
[49] Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
[50] Volante, L. (2009). Assessment of, for, and as learning within schools: Implications for transforming classroom practice. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
[51] Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (2008). The role of assessment in preparing for lifelong learning: Problems and challenges. In A. Havnes, & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 87-99). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group
[52] Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory, British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615–631.
[53] Campbell, C., Murphy, J. A., & Holt, J. K. (2002, October). Psychometric analysis of an assessment literacy instrument: Applicability to preservice teachers. Paper presented at the Mid‐Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH.
[54] Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., & Mestre, J. P. (2011). Assessing-to-learn formative assessment materials for high school physics. (UNCG Technical Report No. 2011-002). Retrieved June 1 from University of North Carolina at Greensboro, http://libjournal.uncg.edu/ojs/index.php/UNCGTechRpt/article/viewFile/289/126