Performance, Need and Discriminatory Allegiance of Employees as Awarding Criteria of Distributive Justice
Three types of salary distribution are usually proposed by the theorists of distributive justice: Equality, equity and need. Their influence has been studied, taking into consideration (in terms of equity) the performance of the employees and their degree of allegiance/rebellion in what regards discriminatory hierarchical orders, by taking into account the reasons of such allegiance/rebellion (allegiance out of conviction, legalism or opportunism/ethical rebellion). Conducted in Argentina, the study has confronted 480 students (240 male and 240 female) with a practical case in which they had to advise a manager of a real estate agency on the allocation of a bonus amongst his employees. The latter were characterized according to their respective performance, one of them being further defined as being (or not) in a financial need and as having complied (or not) with a discriminatory hierarchical order regarding foreigners. The results show that the distribution of the bonus only follows the rules of equity and need: The employees more efficient, allegiant or in need, are rewarded more than the others. It is also noteworthy that the allegiant employees are rewarded in the same way, regardless of the reason for their allegiance, and that the employee who refuses to adopt a discriminatory conduct is penalized.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124105Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1260
 J. Colquitt, J. Greenberg, and C.P. Zapata-Phelan, “What is organizational justice? A historical overview of the field,” in J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, pp. 3-56.
 R. Cropanzano, D.E. Bowen, and S.W. Gilliland, “The management of organizational Justice,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 2007, vol. 21, n° 4, pp. 34-48.
 J. Colquitt, D. Conlon, M. Wesson, O. Porter, and Y. Ng, “Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, vol. 86, n° 3, pp. 425-445.
 R. Cropanzano, and J. Greenberg, “Progress in organizational justice: tunneling through the maze,” in C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997, vol. 12, pp. 317-372
 A. El Akremi, M.I. Nasr, and J. Camerman, “Justice organisationnelle: un modèle intégrateur des antécédents et des conséquences,” in A. El Akremi, S. Guerrero & J.P. Neveu (Eds.), Comportement Organisationnel. Bruxelles: De Boeck, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 47-90.
 A. Di Fabio, and F. Bartolini, “L’impact de la justice organisationnelle sur la satisfaction au travail et l’engagement affectif dans un hôpital italien,” Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, vol. 15, n° 4, article en ligne, 2009.
 D. McFarlin, and P. Sweeney, “Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal, 1992, vol. 35, n° 3, pp. 626-637.
 S. Aryee, P. Budhwar, and Z. Xiong Chen, “Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, n° 23, pp. 267-285.
 J. Greenberg, “Cultivating an image of justice: looking fair on the job,” Academy of management executive, 1988, n° 2, pp. 155-158.
 J. Greenberg, “The quest for the justice on the job. Essays and experimentations,” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
 R. Folger, and M. Konovsky, “Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions,” Academy of Management Journal, 1989, vol. 32, n° 1, pp. 115-130.
 C.C. Chang, and A.J. Dubinsky, “Organizational justice in the sales force: a literature review with propositions,” Journal of Business to Business Marketing, 2005, n° 12, pp. 35-71.
 D. Fields, M. Pang, and C. Chiu, “Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of employee outcomes in Hong Kong,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2000, n° 21, pp. 547-562.
 M. Konovsky, and R. Cropanzano, “The perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, n° 76, pp. 698-707.
 J.A. Miles, and H.J. Klein, “The fairness of assigning group members to task,” Group and Organization Studies, 1998, vol. 23, n° 1, pp. 71-97.
 J.D. Shaw, N. Gupta, and J.E. Delery, “Pay dispersion and work force performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence,” Strategic Management Journal, 2002, n° 23, pp. 491-512.
 R. Moorman, and Z.S. Byrne, “What is the role of justice in promoting organizational citizenship behavior?,” in J. Greenberg & J.A. Colquitt (Eds), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, pp. 355-382.
 D.L. Shapiro, and B.L. Kirkman, “Employees’ reaction to the change to work teams: the influence of anticipatory injustice,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1999, n° 12, pp. 51-66.
 R. Cropanzano, Z.S. Byrne, D.R. Bobocel, and D.R. Rupp, “Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001, n° 58, pp. 164–209.
 M. Konovsky, “Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations,” Journal of Management, 2000, n° 26, pp. 489–511.
 R. Folger, “Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace,” Social Justice Research, 1987, n° 1, 143-159.
 G.S. Leventhal, “The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations,” in L. Berkowitz & E. Walters (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. New-York: Academic Press, 1976, vol. 9, pp. 91-131.
 G.S. Leventhal, “What sould be done with equity theory?,” in K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg & R.H. Willis (Ed.), Social exchange: advances in theory and research. New-York: Plenum, 1980, pp. 27-55.
 E.A. Lind, and T.R. Tyler, “The social psychology of procedural justice,” New York: Plenum, 1988.
 J. Thibaut, and L. Walter, “Procedural justice: a psychological analysis,” Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1975.
 R. Bies, “Interactional (in)justice: the sacred and the profane,” in J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2001, pp. 89-118.
 R. Bies, and J.S. Moag, “Interactional justice: communication criteria for fairness,” in B. Sheppard (Ed.), Research on negotiation in organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986, pp.43-55.
 R. Folger, and R. Cropanzano, “Organizational justice and human resource management,” Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1998.
 D.R. Bobocel, and A. Zdaniuk, “How explanations can be used to foster organizational justice,” in J. Greenberg & J.A. Colquitt (Eds), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, pp. 329-354.
 J.A. Colquitt, and J.C. Shaw, “How should organizational justice be measured?,” in J. Greenberg & J.A. Colquitt (Eds), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, pp. 113-152.
 J.A. Colquitt, “On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, n° 86, pp. 386-400.
 M.L. Gales, and C. Barzantny, “The cultural boundedness of organizational behavior constructs: the case of procedural and distributive justice,” Communication au 11th Congrès de l’Association francophone de gestion des ressources humaines, Paris, nov. 2000.
 D.M. Cowherd, and D.I. Levine, “Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, n° 37, pp. 302-320.
 C.L. Hulin, “Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations,” in M. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1991, pp. 445-506.
 J. Pfeffer, and N. Langston, “The effects of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, n° 38, pp. 382-407.
 P.D. Sweeny, D.B. McFarlin, and E.J. Inderrieden, “Using relative deprivation theory to explain satisfaction with income and pay level: A multistudy examination,” Academy of Management Journal, 1990, n° 33, pp. 423-436.
 M. Deutsch, “Equity, equality and need: what determine which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?,” Journal of Social Issues, 1975, n° 31, pp. 137-149.
 M. Deutsch, “Distributive justice,” New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
 B. Kabanoff, “Equity, equality, power and conflict,” Academic of Management Review, 1991, vol. 16, n° 2, pp. 416-441.
 E.E. Sampson, “Justice ideology and social legitimation: a revised agenda for psychological inequity,” in H.W. Bierhoff, R.L. Cohen & J. Greenberg (Eds), Justice in social relations. New-York: Plenum Press, 1986, pp. 87-102.
 J.S. Adams, “Toward and understanding of inequity,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, n° 67, pp. 422-436.
 J.S. Adams, “Inequity in social exchange,” in L. Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New-York & London: Academic Press, 1965, vol. 2, pp. 267-299.
 P.M. Blau, “Interaction: social exchange,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: The Free Press, 1968, pp. 452-457.
 A. Gouldner, “The norm of reciprocity,” American Sociological Review, 1960, n° 25, pp. 165-167.
 G.C. Homans, “Social behavior: its elementary forms,” New-York: Harcourt, Brace, 1961.
 H.H. Kelly, and J.W. Thibaut, “Interpersonal Relations: a theory of Interdependence,” New York: Wiley, 1978.
 N. Fast, and N. Berg, “Lincoln Electric,” Cambridge, MA: The President and Fellows of Harvard College, 1975.
 K. James, “The social context of organizational justice: culture, intergroup and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions,” in R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: approaching fairness in human resources management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, 1993, pp. 21-50.
 J. Martin, and J. W. Harder, “Bread and roses: justice and the distribution of financial and socio-emotional rewards in organizations,” Social Justice Research, 1994, n° 7, pp. 241-26.
 B. Sheppard, and M. Tuchinsky, “Micro-OB and the network organization,” in R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, 1996, pp. 140-165.
 C.C. Chen, J.R. Meindl, and H. Hui, “Deciding on equity or parity: a test of situational, cultural and individual factors,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1998, n° 19, pp. 115-129.
 R. Cropanzano, and M.L. Ambrose, “Procedural and organizational justice are more similar than you think: a monistic perspective and a research agenda,” in J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds), Advances in organizational justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001, pp. 119-151.
 F. Dubet, “Injustices, l'expérience des inégalités au travail,” Paris: Seuil, 2006.
 D. Steiner, W.A. Trahan, D.E. Haptonstahl, and V. Fointiat, “The justice of equity, equality and need in reward distributions: a comparison of french and american respondents,” International Review of Social Psychology, 2006, n° 19, pp. 49-74.
 M.H. Bond, K. Leung, and S. Schwartz,“Explaining choices in procedural and distributive justice across cultures,” International Journal of Psychology, 1992, n° 27, pp. 211-225.
 K. Leung, “Theoretical advances in justice behavior: some cross-cultural inputs,” in M.H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge of social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988, pp. 218-229.
 K. Leung, and M.H. Bond, “The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, n° 47, pp. 793-804.
 K. Leung, and H.J. Park, “Effects of interactional goal on choice of allocation rule: A cross-national study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986, n° 37, pp. 111-120.
 E.A. Lind, “Procedural justice and culture: evidence for ubiquitous process concerns,” Zeitschrift für Rechts-Soziologie, 1994, n° 15, pp. 24-36.
 E.A. Lind, and P.C. Earley, “Procedural justice and culture,” International Journal of Psychology, 1992, n° 27, pp. 227-242.
 G. Mikula, B. Petri, and N. Tanzer, “What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experience of injustice,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 1990, n° 20, pp. 133-149.
 J. O’Connell, and C.A. Bartlett, “Lincoln Electric,” Venturing Abroad. Cambridge, MA: The President and Fellows of Harvard College, 1998.
 G. Hofstede, “Culture’s Consequences,” London: Sage, 1980.
 G. Hofstede, “Cultures and Organisations,” London: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
 M.H. Bond, K. Leung, and K.C. Wan, “How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contribution on reward distribution,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1982, n° 13, pp. 186–200.
 S. Clayton, and S. Opotow, “Justice and identity: changing perspectives on what is fair,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2003, vol. 7, n° 4, pp. 298-310.
 J. Greenberg, “The seven loose canons of organizational justice,” in J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds), Advances in organizational justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001, pp. 245-272.
 K.I. Kim, H. Park, and N. Suzuki, “Reward allocations in the United States, Japan and Korea: a comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures,” Academy of Management Journal, 1990, n° 33, pp. 188-198.
 J. Miles, and J. Greenberg, “Cross-national differences in preferences for distributive justice norms: the challenge of establishing fair resources allocations in the European community,” in J.B. Shaw, P.S. Kirkbride & K.M. Rowland (Eds), Research in personal and human resources management. Greenwich, C.T.: JAI Press, 1993, pp. 133-156.
 M.W. Morris, and K.K. M.W. Leung, “Justice for all? Progress en research on cultural variation in the psychology of distributive and procedural justice,” Applied Psychology: an International Review, 2000, n° 49, pp. 100-132.
 V. Murphy-Berman, and J.J. Berman, “Cross-cultural differences in perception of distributive justice: a comparison of Hong-Kong and Indonesia,” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 2002, n° 33, pp. 157-170.
 V. Murphy-Berman, J.J. Berman, P. Singh, A. Pachauri, and P. Kumar, “Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritious recipients: a cross-cultural comparison,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, n° 46, pp. 1267-1272.
 R. Shao, D.E. Rupp, P.P. Skarlicki, and K.S. Jones, “Employee justice across cultures: a meta-analytic review,” Journal of Management, 2013, vol. 39, n° 1, pp. 263-301.
 L.J. Skitka, and P.E. Tetlock, “Allocating scarce resources: a contingency model of distributive justice,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, n° 28, pp. 33-37.
 D. Miller, “Principles of Social Justice,” Cambridge,Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
 B. Gangloff, “L'estime de soi, et quelques autres variables différenciatrices de la satisfaction et de l'implication au travail,” Psychologie et de Psychométrie, Revue de Langue Française, 1994, n° 15, pp. 5-32.
 B. Gangloff, “La norme d’allégeance,” in S. Laberon (Ed.), Psychologie et recrutement. Bruxelles: De Boeck, 2011, pp. 177-197.
 L. Dagot, “L'allégeance et l'internalité dans le travail d'aide à l'insertion professionnelle: le cas du bilan de compétences,” Communication 11th Congrès International de Psychologie du Travail de Langue Française, Rouen, 2000, août.
 L. Dagot, “Normativité de l'allégeance et de l'internalité: le cas des acteurs du marché du travail,” Thèse de doctorat en psychologie. Bordeaux: Université de Bordeaux 2, 2002.
 S. Bucchioni, “Rôles respectifs de l'internalité et de l'allégeance dans l'évaluation professionnelle,” Unpublished manuscript. Reims: Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Dpt de Psychologie, 2001.
 H. Legrain, and L. Dagot, “Internalité et allégeance,” in Proc. Colloque AFPA/INOIP/AIPLF « l'Approche Psychologique du Travail ». Lille: AFPA/AIPTLF, 2005, pp. 65-70.
 L. Dagot, and D. Castra, “L'allégeance: un principe des logiques d'aide à l'insertion professionnelle,” L'orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 2002, vol. 31, n° 3, pp. 417-442.
 L. Dagot, “Conseiller et recruter: des logiques sociales d'évaluation,” Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 2004, n° 63, pp. 93-106.
 C. Duchon, and B. Gangloff, “Differential valorization of the unemployed persons according to the ideological or mercenary reason of their support versus non support for the allegiance norm,” in Proc. 5th International Conference of Applied Psychology. Timisoara, Roumania: Editura Eurobit, 2008, pp. 177-182.
 I. Gilles, R. Scheidegger, and C. Toma, “Who likes the rebels and who likes the allegiants? The role of membership and status in the judgment of rebel attributions,” Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 2011, vol. 24, n° 1, pp. 83-106.
 B. Gangloff, and L. Mayoral, “Influencia del nivel de alineacion y del genero sobre las decisiones de administracion y de reclutamiento de personal en las empresas argentinas,” Boletin de Psicologia, 2008b, n° 94, pp. 23-45.
 B. Gangloff, and L. Mayoral,“La percepcion de los obreros, ejecutivos del nivel medio y sindicalistas argentinos respecto del nivel de alineacion conveniente para ser reclutados,” Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 2008a, vol. 42, n° 2, pp. 338-352.
 P.A. Touzé, “Personality and prediction of performance in the workpkace,” Le Travail Humain, 2005, vol. 68, n° 1, pp. 37-53.
 B. Monin, P.J. Sawyer, and M.J. Marquez, “The rejection of moral rebels: resenting those who do the right thing,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, vol. 95, n° 1, pp. 76-93.
 G.F. Wagstaff, J.P. Huggins, and T.J. Perfect, “Equity, equality and need in the adult family,” The Journal of Social Psychology, 1993, vol. 133, n° 4, pp. 439-443.
 C. Soudan, and B. Gangloff, “Impact de l’allégeance en ses dimensions idéologique et mercenaire sur les réactions aux injustices professionnelles,” Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 2011, vol. 9, n° 2, pp. 36-53.