Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30526
An Improved Approach for Hybrid Rocket Injection System Design

Authors: M. Invigorito, G. Elia, M. Panelli

Abstract:

Hybrid propulsion combines beneficial properties of both solid and liquid rockets, such as multiple restarts, throttability as well as simplicity and reduced costs. A nitrous oxide (N2O)/paraffin-based hybrid rocket engine demonstrator is currently under development at the Italian Aerospace Research Center (CIRA) within the national research program HYPROB, funded by the Italian Ministry of Research. Nitrous oxide belongs to the class of self-pressurizing propellants that exhibit a high vapor pressure at standard ambient temperature. This peculiar feature makes those fluids very attractive for space rocket applications because it avoids the use of complex pressurization systems, leading to great benefits in terms of weight savings and reliability. To avoid feed-system-coupled instabilities, the phase change is required to occur through the injectors. In this regard, the oxidizer is stored in liquid condition while target chamber pressures are designed to lie below vapor pressure. The consequent cavitation and flash vaporization constitute a remarkably complex phenomenology that arises great modelling challenges. Thus, it is clear that the design of the injection system is fundamental for the full exploitation of hybrid rocket engine throttability. The Analytical Hierarchy Process has been used to select the injection architecture as best compromise among different design criteria such as functionality, technology innovation and cost. The impossibility to use engineering simplified relations for the dimensioning of the injectors led to the needs of applying a numerical approach based on OpenFOAM®. The numerical tool has been validated with selected experimental data from literature. Quantitative, as well as qualitative comparisons are performed in terms of mass flow rate and pressure drop across the injector for several operating conditions. The results show satisfactory agreement with the experimental data. Modeling assumptions, together with their impact on numerical predictions are discussed in the paper. Once assessed the reliability of the numerical tool, the injection plate has been designed and sized to guarantee the required amount of oxidizer in the combustion chamber and therefore to assure high combustion efficiency. To this purpose, the plate has been designed with multiple injectors whose number and diameter have been selected in order to reach the requested mass flow rate for the two operating conditions of maximum and minimum thrust. The overall design has been finally verified through three-dimensional computations in cavitating non-reacting conditions and it has been verified that the proposed design solution is able to guarantee the requested values of mass flow rates.

Keywords: cavitation, hybrid rocket, injection system design, OpenFOAM®

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1123624

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1899

References:


[1] S. Borrelli et al., “The HYPROB Program Mastering Key Technologies, Design and Testing Capabilities for Space Transportation Rocket Propulsion Evolution” in Proc. 63rd International Astronautical Congress, Naples, Italy, 2012.
[2] M. Di Clemente et al., “Hybrid rocket technology in the frame of the italian HYPROB program” in Proc. 8th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics and Space Vehicles, Lisbon, Portugal, 2015.
[3] P. Dvorak, R. Tijsterman, “Numerical and experimental evaluation of the performance of a cavitating valve for the control of oxidizer flow in a hybrid rocket engine” in Proc. 5th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences, EUCASS, Munich, Germany, 2013.
[4] E. Gamper et al., “Design and test of nitrous oxide injectors for a hybrid rocket engine”, in Proc. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, Stuttgart, Germany, 2013.
[5] G. A. Dressler, J. M. Bauer, “TRW pintle engine heritage and performance characteristics”, in Proc. 36th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Huntsville, USA, 2000.
[6] T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[7] G. Elia, et al., “Injection system design of an N2O-Paraffin hybrid rocket demonstrator” in Proc. 3rd ECCOMAS YIC, Aachen, Germany, July 20-23, 2015.
[8] P. J. Linstrom and W. G. Mallard, editors. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899, June 2005.
[9] J. Hesson and R. Peck, “Flow of two-phase carbon dioxide through orifices,” AIChE Journal, vol. 4, issue 2, pages 207–210, 1958.
[10] J. Dyer, E. Doran et al., “Modeling feed system flow physics for self-pressurizing propellants”, in Proc. 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2007.
[11] B.S. Waxman, “An investigation of injectors for use with high vapor pressure propellants with applications to hybrid rockets”, PhD Thesis. Stanford University, 2014.
[12] C.W. Hirt and B.D. Nichols, “Volume of fluid method (VOF) for the dynamics of free boundaries”, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 39, issue 1, pages 201-225, 1981.
[13] O. Ubbink, “Numerical prediction of two fluid systems with sharp interfaces”, PhD Thesis, University of London, 1997.
[14] C.L. Merkle et al., “Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation”, in Proc. 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation, pages 47-54, Grenoble, France, 1998.
[15] R.F. Kunz et al., “A preconditioned Navier-Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction”, Computer and Fluids, vol. 29, issue 8, pages 849-875, 2000.
[16] G. Schnerr and J. Sauer, “Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics”, in Proc. 4th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, New Orleans, USA, 2001.
[17] H. Weller, “A new approach to VOF-based interface capturing methods for incompressible and compressible flow”. Report TR/HGW/04. OpenCFD Ltd., 2008.
[18] S.S. Deshpande et al., “Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interfoam”, Computational Science and Discovery, vol. 5, Issue 1, 2012.
[19] X. Margot et al., “Numerical modeling of cavitation: validation and parametric studies”, Engineering Application of Computational Fluid Mechanics, vol. 6, issue 1, pages 15-24, 2012.
[20] M. Invigorito et al., “Application of OpenFOAM for rocket design”, in Proc. 9th OpenFOAM Workshop, Zagreb, Croatia, 2014.
[21] R.I Issa, “Solution of the implicitly discretized fluid flow equations by operator-splitting”, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 62, issue 1, pages 40-65, 1986.