Model Studies on Shear Behavior of Reinforced Reconstituted Clay

Authors: B. A. Mir, A. Juneja

Abstract:

In this paper, shear behavior of reconstituted clay reinforced with varying diameter of sand compaction piles with area replacement-ratio (a_s) of 6.25, 10.24, 16, 20.25 and 64% in 100mm diameter and 200mm long clay specimens is modeled using consolidated drained and undrained triaxial tests under different confining pressures ranging from 50kPa to 575kPa. The test results show that the stress-strain behavior of the clay was highly influenced by the presence of SCP. The insertion of SCPs into soft clay has shown to have a positive effect on the load carrying capacity of the clay, resulting in a composite soil mass that has greater shear strength and improved stiffness compared to the unreinforced clay due to increased reinforcement area ratio. In addition, SCP also acts as vertical drain in the clay thus accelerating the dissipation of excess pore water pressures that are generated during loading by shortening the drainage path and activating radial drainage, thereby reducing post-construction settlement. Thus, sand compaction piles currently stand as one of the most viable and practical techniques for improving the mechanical properties of soft clays.

Keywords: Reconstituted clay, SCP, shear strength, stress-strain response, triaxial tests.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1111655

References:

[1] Cotecchia, F. and Chandler, R. J. “The influence of structure on the pre-failure behaviour of natural clay”, Geotechnique 47(3), 523-544, 1977.
[2] Burland J. B. On the compressibility and shear strength of natural soils. Géotechnique 40(3), 329-378, 1990.
[3] Rampello, S. & Silvestri, F. “The stress-strain behavior of natural and reconstituted samples of two overconsolidated clays”, Proc. of the Int. Sym. on Geotech. Engg. of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks, Athens, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Vol. 1, pp. 769-78, 1993.
[4] Bouazza, A., Van Impe, W. F. and Haegeman, W. “Some mechanical properties of reconstituted Boom clay”, Geoteehnical and Geological Engineering, Vol.14, pp. 341-352, 1996.
[5] Mir, B. A., “Study of the influence of smear zone around sand compaction pile on properties of composite ground”, 2010, Ph.D. Thesis, Deptt. Of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
[6] Mir, B. A. & Juneja, A., “Strength behavior of composite ground reinforced with sand compaction piles,” Proc. IGC-2010: GEOtrendz, Vol. II, pp.645-648, 2010.
[7] Olson, R. E., and Mesti, G., “Mechanism controlling compressibility of clays,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 96, pp. 1863-1878, 1970.
[8] Sridharan, A. and Rao, G. V. (1973). Mechanisms controlling volume change of saturated clays and the role of the effective stress concept, Geotechnique, 23(3), pp. 359-382.
[9] La Rochelle, P., Sarrailh, J., Tavenas, F., Roy, M., and Leroueil, S., “Causes of sampling disturbance and design of a new sampler for sensitive soils,” Can. Geotech. J, 18(1), pp. 52–66, 1981.
[10] Hong, Z., and Onitsuka, K,. “A method of correcting yield stress and compression index of Ariake clays for sample disturbance,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 211–222, 1998.
[11] Mitchell, J. K, “Soil improvement- state of the art report,” Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Foundation Engineering Vol. 4, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 509-565, 1981.
[12] Aboshi H and Suematsu N, “Sand compaction pile method: State-of-the art paper”, Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Geotech. Seminar on Soil Improvement Methods, Narryang Technological Institute, Singapore, pp. 38-44, 1985.
[13] BS 1377-1, “Methods of test for soils for general requirements and sample preparation”, British Standards Institute, 1990, London.
[14] BS 1377-8, British standard method for soils for civil purposes-part-8: Shear strength tests (effective stress). British Standards Institution, 1990, London.
[15] Mayne, P. W. and Kulhawy, F. H., “Ko- OCR relationship”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE (108), 851-872, 1982.
[16] Juneja, A & Mir, B. A., “Behavior of clay reinforced by sand compaction pile with smear”, Proceedings of the ICE-Ground Improvement, 165 (2), pp. 111-124, 2012.
[17] Wroth, C. P., The interpretation of in-situ soil tests. Geotechnique 34 (4), pp. 449-489, 1984.
[18] Aboshi, H., Ichimoto, E., Enoki M. and Harada, K., “Composer: method to improve characteristics of soft clays by inclusions of large diameter sand column,” Proc. of the Int. Conf. on soil reinforcement: reinforced earth and other technique, Paris, Vol. 1, pp. 211-216, 1979.
[19] Skempton, A. W., "The pore-pressure coefficients A and B," Geotechnique 4 (4), pp. 143-147, 1954.
[20] F.H. Lee, A. Juneja and T.S. Tan, "Stress and pore pressure changes due to sand compaction pile installation in soft clay," Geotechnique 54(1), pp. 1-16, 2004.
[21] Atkinson JH, Evans JS and Ho EWL, “Non-uniformity of triaxial samples due to consolidation with radial drainage”, Geotechnique 35(3), pp. 353-355, 1985.
[22] Mir, B. A. & Juneja, A., “Permeability and consolidation behavior of composite ground reinforced with sand columns”, Int. J. of GEOMATE, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Sl. No. 12), pp. 832-839, 2014.
[23] Bergado DT, Alfaro MC and Balasubramaniam AS, “Improvement of soft Bangkok clay using vertical drains”, Journal of Geotextiles and Geomembranes 12, pp. 615-663, 1993.