Ads on Social Issues: A Tool for Improving Critical Thinking Skills in a Foreign Language Classroom

Authors: Fonseca Jully, Chia Maribel, Rodríguez Ilba

Abstract:

This paper is a qualitative research report. A group of students form a public university in a small town in Colombia participated in this study which aimed at describing to what extend the use of social ads, published on the internet, helped to develop their critical thinking skills. Students’ productions, field notes, video recordings and direct observation were the instruments and techniques used by the researches in order to gather the data which was analyzed under the principles of grounded theory and triangulation. The implementation of social ads into the classroom evidenced a noticeable improvement in students’ ability to interpret and argue social issues, as well as, their self-improvement in oral and written production in English, as a foreign language.

Keywords: Ads, critical argumentation, critical thinking, social issues.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338908

References:

[1] R. H. Ennis, The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities, May 2011, p.1.
[2] R. Paul, and E. Linda, Critical Thinking, Concepts and tools. The Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2006, p.4.
[3] B. Benjamin, A Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, The Cognitive Domain. New York: David Mckay,1950.
[4] W. Douglas, Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge University. Press, 2006.
[5] G. David, Deceptive Advertisement. University of Illinois, 1975.
[6] D. L. F. Jorge. Caja de Herramientas: ¿Cómo se define un problema social y se elaboran objetivos en los procesos de planificación ? Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas Universidad de Chile, 2010.
[7] B. Herbert, Social problems as collective behavior. Oxford University press, 1971.
[8] K. Ralph. Interpreting Bach’s Well-tempered Clavier. A performer’s discourse of method. Yale University Press, 1984, p. 127.
[9] V. Frans, A systematic theory of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[10] H. Jeremy, The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman, Third Edition, 2001.
[11] S. Paul, S. Neville, W. Guy and J. Daniel. Distributed Situation Awareness: Theory, Measurement and Application to Teamwork. Ashgate Publishing Company, 2009, p. 21.
[12] P. Richard and B. Kimberlee. Teacher as Reflective Practitioner and Action Researcher. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thomas, 2002.
[13] D. Zoltán.. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press, 2007.
[14] R. Jack. Professional Development for Language Teacher: Strategies for Teacher Learning. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[15] F. Donald. Doing Teacher Research: from Inquiry to Understanding. Pacific Grove: Heinle & Heinle, 1988.
[16] S. Anselm. and C. Juliet. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications,2nd edition, 1990.
[17] S. Linda. Images in Advertising: the need for a theory of visual rhetoric. The journal of consumer research,1994 p.253.
[18] C. Jamin. A Problem with Problem Solving: Teaching Thinking Without Teaching Knowledge. The Mathematics Educator 2007, Vol. 17, No. 2, 7–14 2007, p- 7.
[19] B. Juan and J. Fernando. Bullying: description and analysis of the phenomenon. Electronic journal of research in educational psychology. (9) 151-170, 2006, p.154.
[20] Ț. Adela and S. Ína. Learner Autonomy Theoretical and Practical Information for Language Teachers.2011, p. 19.
[21] K. F. J., G. Ludwika and R. Faranak. Higher Order Thinking Skills. A publication of the Educational Services Program, now known as the Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment www.cala.fsu.edu
[22] S. Robert. Critical thinking: Its nature, measurement, and improvement National Institute of Education. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED272882.pdf,