Effects of Upstream Wall Roughness on Separated Turbulent Flow over a Forward Facing Step in an Open Channel

Authors: S. M. Rifat, André L. Marchildon, Mark F. Tachie

Abstract:

The effect of upstream surface roughness over a smooth forward facing step in an open channel was investigated using a particle image velocimetry technique. Three different upstream surface topographies consisting of hydraulically smooth wall, sandpaper 36 grit and sand grains were examined. Besides the wall roughness conditions, all other upstream flow characteristics were kept constant. It was also observed that upstream roughness decreased the approach velocity by 2% and 10% but increased the turbulence intensity by 14% and 35% at the wall-normal distance corresponding to the top plane of the step compared to smooth upstream. The results showed that roughness decreased the reattachment lengths by 14% and 30% compared to smooth upstream. Although the magnitudes of maximum positive and negative Reynolds shear stress in separated and reattached region were 0.02Ue for all the cases, the physical size of both the maximum and minimum contour levels were decreased by increasing upstream roughness.

Keywords: Forward facing step, open channel, separated and reattached turbulent flows, wall roughness.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338886

References:

[1] M. Sherry, D. Lo Jacono and J. Sheridan, “An experimental investigation of the recirculation zone formed downstream of a forward facing step,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., Vol. 98(12), pp. 888–894.
[2] H. Ren and Y. Wu, “Turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough forward-facing steps,” Phys. Fluids. 23 (2011), 045102.
[3] Y. Wu and H. Ren, “On the impacts of coarse-scale models of realistic roughness on a forward-facing step turbulent flow,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, Vol. 40, pp. 15–31.
[4] E.E. Essel, S. Mali, E.W. Thacher and M.F. Tachie, “Upstream roughness effects on reattached turbulent flow over forward facing step,” 10th International ERCOFTAC Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Spain, September 2014.
[5] J. F. Largeau and V. Moriniere, “Wall pressure fluctuations and topology in separated flows over a forward-facing Step,” Exp. Fluids, Vol. 42, pp. 21–40.
[6] V. De Brederode and P. Bradshaw, “Three-dimensional flow in nominally two-dimensional separation bubbles: flow behind a rearwardfacing step,” Imp. Coll. Aeronaut. Rep., pp. 72–19.
[7] K. A. Flack and M. P. Schultz, “Review of Hydraulic Roughness Scales in the Fully Rough Regime,” J. Fluids Eng. 132, 041203–10.
[8] D. J. Forliti, P. J. Strykowski, and K. Debatin, “Bias and precision errors of digital particle image velocimetry,” Exp. Fluids. 28 (2000), pp. 436– 447.
[9] L. Casarsa and P. Giannattasio, “Three-dimensional features of the turbulent flow through a planar sudden expansion,” Phys. Fluids. 20 (2008), 015103.
[10] H. Hattori, and Y. Nagano, “Investigation of turbulent boundary layer over forward-facing step via direct numerical simulation,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 31(3), pp. 284–294.
[11] E.E. Essel, A. Nematollahi, E.W. Thacher and M.F. Tachie, “Effects of upstream roughness and Reynolds number on separated and reattached turbulent flow,” Journal of Turbulence, Vol. 16, Issue 9, 2015.