Determination of the Pullout/Holding Strength at the Taper-Trunnion Junction of Hip Implants

Authors: Obinna K. Ihesiulor, Krishna Shankar, Paul Smith, Alan Fien

Abstract:

Excessive fretting wear at the taper-trunnion junction (trunnionosis) apparently contributes to the high failure rates of hip implants. Implant wear and corrosion lead to the release of metal particulate debris and subsequent release of metal ions at the tapertrunnion surface. This results in a type of metal poisoning referred to as metallosis. The consequences of metal poisoning include; osteolysis (bone loss), osteoarthritis (pain), aseptic loosening of the prosthesis and revision surgery. Follow up after revision surgery, metal debris particles are commonly found in numerous locations. Background: A stable connection between the femoral ball head (taper) and stem (trunnion) is necessary to prevent relative motions and corrosion at the taper junction. Hence, the importance of component assembly cannot be over-emphasized. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the influence of head-stem junction assembly by press fitting and the subsequent disengagement/disassembly on the connection strength between the taper ball head and stem. Methods: CoCr femoral heads were assembled with High stainless hydrogen steel stem (trunnion) by Push-in i.e. press fit; and disengaged by pull-out test. The strength and stability of the two connections were evaluated by measuring the head pull-out forces according to ISO 7206-10 standards. Findings: The head-stem junction strength linearly increases with assembly forces.

Keywords: Wear, modular hip prosthesis, taper head-stem, force assembly, force disassembly.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1110007

References:

[1] U. Holzwarth and G. Cotogno., Total hip arthroplasty: State of the art, challenges and prospects. 2012: Joint Research Centre of the European Commission.
[2] A. O. Association., National Bone and Joint Registry Annual Report. 2011.
[3] S. Kurtz et al., Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2007. 89(4): p. 780-785.
[4] L. Blunt et al., The role of tribology and metrology in the latest development of bio-materials. Wear, 2009. 266(3): p. 424-431.
[5] B. Orthopedics, Precautionary Statement. 2006.
[6] B. Orthopedics, BIOLOX®delta Option Ceramic Femoral Head System Product Features and Instructions for Use. 2010.
[7] R. Bruhn, C. Schaerer, N. Gronau and U. Wyss, 2010.
[8] J. P. Heiney, S. Battula, G. A. Vrabec, A. Parikh, R. Blice, A. J. Schoenfeld et al., Impact magnitudes applied by surgeons and their importance when applying the femoral head onto the Morse taper for total hip arthroplasty. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg, 2009. 129: p. 793- 796.
[9] M. L. Mroczkowski, J. S. Hertzler, S. M. Humphrey, T. Johnson, C. R. Blanchard, Effect of impact assembly on the fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2006. 24: p. 271- 279.
[10] Annelie Rehmer, N. E. Bishop, Michael M. Morlock, Influence of assembly procedure and material combination on the strength of the taper connection at the head–neck junction of modular hip endoprostheses. Clinical Biomechanics, 2012. 27: p. 77-83.
[11] A.T. Pennock, A.H.S., C.A. Bourgeault, Morse-type tapers—factors that may influence taper strength during total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplast, 2002. 17: p. 773-778.