Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33104
Logistics Model for Improving Quality in Railway Transport
Authors: Eva Nedeliakova, Juraj Camaj, Jaroslav Masek
Abstract:
This contribution is focused on the methodology for identifying levels of quality and improving quality through new logistics model in railway transport. It is oriented on the application of dynamic quality models, which represent an innovative method of evaluation quality services. Through this conception, time factor, expected, and perceived quality in each moment of the transportation process within logistics chain can be taken into account. Various models describe the improvement of the quality which emphases the time factor throughout the whole transportation logistics chain. Quality of services in railway transport can be determined by the existing level of service quality, by detecting the causes of dissatisfaction employees but also customers, to uncover strengths and weaknesses. This new logistics model is able to recognize critical processes in logistic chain. It includes service quality rating that must respect its specific properties, which are unrepeatability, impalpability, their use right at the time they are provided and particularly changeability, which is significant factor in the conditions of rail transport as well. These peculiarities influence the quality of service regarding the constantly increasing requirements and that result in new ways of finding progressive attitudes towards the service quality rating.Keywords: Logistics model, quality, railway transport.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1109796
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1831References:
[1] E. Nedeliaková, A. Dolinayová, I. Nedeliak, “Methods of evaluation of the transportation services quality”, University of Žilina in Žilina, EDIS, 2013.
[2] I. Kubasáková, M. Šulgan, “Modern logistic system – effective customer response (ECR)” in Transport and communications, University of Žilina in Žilina, 2005, pp. 5-10.
[3] J. Camaj, A. Dolinayova, J. Lalinska, M. Bariak, “The Technological Problem of Simulation of the Logistics Center”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index, Economics and Management Engineering, 1(4), 2014, p. 2618-2622.
[4] J. Camaj, J. Lalinska, J.Masek, “Simulations of continental logistics center from the perspecive of gechnlogist” in ICIMSA 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2014. Proceeding book of conference. Beijing: IEEE, 2014, p. 305-308.
[5] J. Gnap, M. Poliak, J. Sosedová, J. Jagelčák, “Zasielateľstvo”, University of Žilina, 2011.
[6] J. Majerčák, I. Nedeliak, “Practical experiences with modeling of IT systems and business processes,” in 6th Forum of rail transport, Bratislava, 2010, pp. 81-84.
[7] J. Majerčák, J. Plevko, P. Majerčák, “Logistics assessment of functional performance of material flows in railway transport,” Sovremennyje realii, trendy I innovacii v upravlenii biznes-processami na transporte: Trudy medžunarodnoj naučno-praktičeskoj konferencii. Moskva: OOO “NIPKC Voschod-A”, 2014, p. 299-301.
[8] J. Sekulová, I. Nedeliak, “Utilization of GAP model in providing of services in the railway freight transport,” in Perner´s Contacts, 8th ed. vol. 4, 2013, pp. 67-75.
[9] KEGA 026ŽU-4/2015 “Innovative approaches in system of teaching management in the study program Railway transport with a focus on application the dynamic quality models in the railway transport”, University of Žilina in Žilina, 2015.
[10] M. Poliak, “Current problems of procurement of transport services by public passenger transport,” in Current problems in transport 2009, Pardubice: Institut Jana Pernera v Praze with Přepravní laboratoří Dopravní fakulty Jana Pernera, 2009, pp. 213-218.
[11] P. Majerčák, E. Majerčáková, “The aim of distribution logistics in the Supply Chain,” in SCIECONF 2014, proceedings in scientific conference, University of Zilina, 2014, p. 520-523.