Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30528
Crude Glycerol Affects Canine Sperm Motility: Computer Assisted Semen Analysis in vitro

Authors: P. Massanyi, L. Kichi, T. Slanina, E. Kolesar, J. Danko, N. Lukac, E. Tvrda, R. Stawarz, A. Kolesarova

Abstract:

Target of this study was the analysis of the impact of crude glycerol on canine spermatozoa motility, morphology, viability, and membrane integrity. Experiments were realized in vitro. In the study, semen from 5 large dog breeds was used. They were typical representatives of large breeds, coming from healthy rearing, regularly vaccinated and integrated to the further breeding. Semen collections were realized at the owners of animals and in the veterinary clinic. Subsequently the experiments were realized at the Department of Animal Physiology of the SUA in Nitra. The spermatozoa motility was evaluated using CASA analyzer (SpermVisionTM, Minitub, Germany) at the temperature 5 and 37°C for 5 hours. In the study, 13 motility parameters were evaluated. Generally, crude glycerol has generally negative effect on spermatozoa motility. Morphological analysis was realized using Hancock staining and the preparations were evaluated at magnification 1000x using classification tables of morphologically changed spermatozoa. Data clearly detected the highest number of morphologically changed spermatozoa in the experimental groups (know twisted tails, tail torso and tail coiling). For acrosome alterations swelled acrosomes, removed acrosomes and acrosomes with undulated membrane were detected. In this study also the effect of crude glycerol on spermatozoa membrane integrity were analyzed. The highest crude glycerol concentration significantly affects spermatozoa integrity. Results of this study show that crude glycerol has effect of spermatozoa motility, viability, and membrane integrity. Detected changes are related to crude glycerol concentration, temperature, as well as time of incubation.

Keywords: Dog, glycerol, viability, spermatozoa, semen, acrosome, CASA

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1109269

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1722

References:


[1] A. R. Silva, R. C. S. Cardoso, D. C., Uchoa and L. D. M. Silva, L.D.M. “Quality of canine semen submitted to single or fractionated glycerol addition during the freezing process”´. Theriogenology, vol. 59, pp. 821– 829, 2003.
[2] M. R. Curry, “Cryopreservation of semen from domestic livestock”. Reproduction, vol. 5, pp. 46–52, 2000.
[3] W. V. Holt, “Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: The importance of species and individual differences”. Theriogenology, vol. 53, pp. 47–58, 2000.
[4] E. L. Squires, S. L. and J. K. Graham, “Evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants for preserving stallion spermatozoa”. Theriogenology, vol. 62, pp. 1056–1065, 2004.
[5] G.C. England, “Cryopreservation of dog semen: a review”. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 47, pp. 243–255, 1993.
[6] S. Schäfer-Somi, S. Kluger, E. Knapp, D. Klein and Ch. Aurich, “Effects of semen extender and semen processing on motility and viability of frozen-thawed dog spermatozoa”. Theriogenology, vol. 66, pp. 173–182, 2006.
[7] T. Slanina, K. Bízikova and P. Massanyi, “The effect of glycerol on rabbit spermatozoa motility”. Animal Physiology 2012, Proceedings of international conference, Lednice, pp. 187–191, 2012.
[8] A. Kovacik, L. Kichi, T. Slanina, P. Massanyi, J. Krockova, J. Bulla, P. Cupka, “Use of computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA) for monitoring the effects of glycerol solutions on rabbit spermatozoa motility”. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies, vol. 12, pp. 46–52, 2013.
[9] A.O. Qoja, M. Rafajova, P. Massanyi, “The effect of crude glycerol on rabbit spermatozoa motility in vitro”. Animal Physiology 2011, Proceedings, Nitra, pp. 457–462, 2011.
[10] C.A. Province, R.P. Amann, B.W. Pickett, E.L. Squiers, “Extenders for preservation of canine and equine spermatozoa at 5°C”. Theriogenology, vol. 22, pp. 409–415, 1984.
[11] J. Witowski, J. Knapowski, “Glycerol toxicity for human peritoneal mesothelial cells in culture: comparison with glucose”. International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 17, pp. 252–260, 1994.
[12] K.P. Venkataramanan, Y. Kurniawan, J.J. Boatman, C.H. Haynes, K.A. Taconi, L. Martin, G.D. Bothun, C. Scholz, “Homeoviscous response of Clostridium pasteurianum to butanol toxicity during glycerol fermentation”. Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 179, pp. 8–14, 2014.
[13] P.J. Lammers, B.J. Kerr, T.E. Weber, K. Bregendahl, S.M. Lonergan, K.J. Prusa, D.U. Ahn, W.C. Stoffregen, W.A. Dozier 3rd, M.S. Honeyman, “Growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and tissue histology of growing pigs fed crude glycerin-supplemented diets”. Journal of Animal Science, vol. 86, pp. 2962–2970, 2008.