Sex Differentiation of Elm Nymphalid (Nymphalis polychloros Linnaeus, 1758) on Pupal Stage

Authors: Hanife Genc

Abstract:

This study was conducted to determine sex differentiation of laboratory reared Elm nymphalid (Nymphalis polychloros Linnaeus, 1758) by examining the morphological structure of pupal stage. Laboratory colony of elm nymphalid, reared on pear leaves, was used to set up experiments. It was performed with 5 replications having 8 pupae for each replication. Dorsal, ventral and lateral parts of external morphological structures of pupae were examined by Olympus SZX9 stereozoom microscope and photographed. When fully grown, mature larvae wander the highest part of the rearing cage and pupae were formed hanging by cremaster. After completing prepupa stage about 1.5±0.3 days, they all pupated. Pupal stage was completed at 24±1°C about 4.38±1.20 days. Pupal weights were 0.483±0.05 g in females and 0.392±0.08 g (n=40) in males respectively. Pupal emergence rate was 95%, with 22 females and 16 males. Examinations of ventral parts of 8th, 9th, and 10th abdominal segments revealed that anal opening were found at 10th abdominal segment in both sexes, 3 lumps were determined at 9th abdominal segments then the specific opening structure at 8th segment was only found on female pupae.

Keywords: Butterfly, Nymphalis polychloros, pupae, sex differentiation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107888

References:

[1] D. J. Harvey, “Higher classification of the Nymphalidae. Re In: Nijhout HF, ed. The development and evolution of anglewings butterfly wing patterns”, Washington: Smithsonian University Press, 255–276, 1991.
[2] G. Hesselbarth, H. V. Oorschot, and S. Wagener, ”Die Tagfalter der Türkei”, Selbstverlag Sigbert Wagener, 3 Band, pp. 1354, 1995.
[3] A. Baytas, “A field guide to the butterflies of Turkey”, NTV Press, 218p.
[4] B. Kovancı, N. S. Gencer, and O. B. Kovancı, “Bursa İli’nde bulunan Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) familyasına ait türlerin yayılışı ve bugünkü statüleri”. Turk. entomol. Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 63-80, 2007.
[5] H. Genc, “Determination of sex in pupae of Phyciodes phaon (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)”, Florida Entomologist, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 536-537, 2005.
[6] A. J. Anton, and A. Garrido, “Differences in the morphology of male and female pupae of Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae” Florida Entomologist, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 603-606, 1996.
[7] J. E. Eaton, Lepidopteran Anatomy. Wiley-Interscience Series in Insect Morphology, Carl W. Schaefer (ed.). Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.229 pp, 1988.
[8] P. R, Hughes, C. D, Radke, A. A. Renwick, “A simple, low-input method for continuous laboratory rearing of the monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) for research”, American Entomol., vol. 39, pp. 109-111, 1993.
[9] UW-MADISON, “http://manduca.entomology.wisc.edu/teacher/manual/ pupal.html”, 2002.
[10] F. J. Posada1a, I. Virdiana, M. Navies, M. Pava-Ripoll, and P. Hebbar, “Sexual dimorphism of pupae and adults of the cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha cramerella” Journal of Insect Science, vol. 11, no. 52, pp. 1-8, 2010.
[11] S. Nylin, K. Nyblom, F. Ronquist, N. Janz, J. Belicek and M.Kallersjö, “Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and related butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): a totalevidence analysis”, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 132, pp. 441–468, 2001.
[12] L. Manil, and S. Cuvelier, “Nymphalis xanthomelas (Esper, 1781) Mass migration, temporary colonisation or sustainable expansion? (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)” Lépidoptères vol. 58, pp: 69-74, 2014.
[13] H. Genc, and J. L. Nation, “Life history and biology of Phyciodes phaon (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)” Florida Entomologist, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 445-449, 2003.
[14] H. Genc, and J. L. Nation, “An artificial diet for the butterfly Phyciodes phaon (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)” Florida Entomologist, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 194-198, 2004.