Effective Design Factors for Bicycle-Friendly Streets

Authors: Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Moeinaddini, M. Zaly Shah, A. Hamzah

Abstract:

Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS) is a measure for evaluating street conditions for cyclists. Currently, various methods are proposed for BLOS. These analytical methods however have some drawbacks: they usually assume cyclists as users that can share street facilities with motorized vehicles, it is not easy to link them to design process and they are not easy to follow. In addition, they only support a narrow range of cycling facilities and may not be applicable for all situations. Along this, the current paper introduces various effective design factors for bicycle-friendly streets. This study considers cyclists as users of streets who have special needs and facilities. Therefore, the key factors that influence BLOS based on different cycling facilities that are proposed by developed guidelines and literature are identified. The combination of these factors presents a complete set of effective design factors for bicycle-friendly streets. In addition, the weight of each factor in existing BLOS models is estimated and these effective factors are ranked based on these weights. These factors and their weights can be used in further studies to propose special bicycle-friendly street design model.

Keywords: Bicycle level of service, bicycle-friendly streets, cycling facilities, rating system, urban streets.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107856

References:

[1] N. Cavill and A. Davis. Cycling and Health: What’s the Evidence?. London: Cycling England, 2007.
[2] NHTSA, BTS. "National Survey of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Attitudes and Behaviors." National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2003.
[3] Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Moeinaddini, and M. Zaly Shah. "Disabled Pedestrian Level of Service Method for Evaluating and Promoting Inclusive Walking Facilities on Urban Streets." Journal of Transportation Engineering 139, no. 2 (2013a): 181-92.
[4] Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Moeinaddini, and M. Zaly Shah. "Non-Motorised Level of Service: Addressing Challenges in Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service." Transport Reviews 33, no. 2 (2013b): 166-94.
[5] Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Moeinaddini, and M. Zaly Shah. "A Pedestrian Level of Service Method for Evaluating and Promoting Walking Facilities on Campus Streets." Land Use Policy 38, no. May (2014): 175-93.
[6] Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Zaly Shah. "Practical Evaluation Method for Pedestrian Level of Service in Urban Streets." In International Transport Research Conference. Penang, Malaysia, 2011.
[7] Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Moeinaddini, and M. Zaly Shah. "A Bicycle Safety Index for Evaluating Urban Street Facilities." Traffic Injury Prevention 16 (2015b): 283–88.
[8] Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Moeinaddini, and M. Zaly Shah. "Pedestrian Safety Index for Evaluating Street Facilities in Urban Areas." Safety Science 74 (2015a): 1-14.
[9] M. Moeinaddini, Z. Asadi-Shekari, C. R. Ismail, and M. Zaly Shah. "A Practical Method for Evaluating Parking Area Level of Service." Land Use Policy 33 (2013): 1– 10.
[10] M. Moeinaddini, Z. Asadi-Shekari, Z. Sultan, and M. Zaly Shah. "Analyzing the Relationships between the Number of Deaths in Road Accidents and the Work Travel Mode Choice at the City Level." Safety Science 72 (2015a): 249–54.
[11] M. Moeinaddini, Z. Asadi-Shekari, and M. Zaly Shah. "Analysing the Relationship between Park-and-Ride Facilities and Private Motorised Trips Indicators." Arab J Sci Eng 39 (2014a): 3481–88.
[12] M. Moeinaddini, Z. Asadi-Shekari, and M. Zaly Shah. "The Relationship between Urban Street Networks and the Number of Transport Fatalities at the City Level." Safety Science 62 (2014b): 114–20.
[13] M. Moeinaddini, Z. Asadi-Shekari, and M. Zaly Shah. "An Urban Mobility Index for Evaluating and Reducing Private Motorized Trips." Measurement 63 (2015b): 30–40.
[14] D. Mozer. "Calculating Multi-Mode Levels-of-Service." International Bicycle Fund, 1994.
[15] L. Dixon. "Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems." Transportation Research Record 1538 (1996): 1-9.
[16] S. Jensen. "Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service on Road Way Segments." Transportation Research Record 2031 (2007): 43-51.
[17] J. Davis. "Bicycle Safety Evaluation." Auburn University, City of Chattanooga, and Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission, Chattanooga, Tenn, 1987.
[18] J. Davis. "Bicycle Test Route Evaluation for Urban Road Conditions." In Transportation Congress: Civil Engineers--Key to the World Infrastructure. San Diego, CA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1995.
[19] A. Sorton and T. Walsh. "Bicycle Stress Level as a Tool to Evaluate Urban and Suburban Bicycle Compatibility." Transportation Research Record 1438 (1994): 17-24.
[20] Cambridge Systematics. "Guidebook on Methods to Estimate Nonmotorized Travel." Bicycle Federation of America, and Michael Replogle. Cambridge MA, 1998.
[21] D. L. Harkey, D. W. Reinfurt, and M. Knuiman. "Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index." Transportation Research Record 1636 (1998a): 13-20.
[22] D. L. Harkey, D. W. Reinfurt, M. Knuiman, and J. R. Stewart. "The Bicycle Compatibility Index: A Level of Service Concept." US: FHWA, Department of Transportation, 1998b.
[23] I. Hallett, D. Luskin, and R. Machemehl. "Evaluation of on-Street Bicycle Facilities Added to Existing Roadways." Texas, Austin: Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 2006.
[24] B. W. Landis, V. R. Vattikuti, and M. T. Brannick. "Real-Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service." Transportation Research Record 1578 (1997): 119-26.
[25] R. Hughes and D. Harkey. "Cyclists’ Perception of Risk in a Virtual Environment: Effects of Lane Conditions, Traffic Speed, and Traffic Volume." In American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Conference on Traffic Congestion and Traffic Safety in the 21st Century,. Chicago, IL, 1997.
[26] M. Kokura, M. Suga, B. Lee, K. Shirakawa, T. Suwa and N. Ohmori. "Safety and Enjoyability Evaluation of Roads and Streets for Bicycles: Case Studies of Bicycle Maps from Utsunomiya and Chigasaki, Japan." Journal of Maps 6 (2010): 199-210.
[27] J. K. Providelo and S. Sanches. "Roadway and Traffic Characteristics for Bicycling." Transportation 38, no. 5 (2011): 765–77.
[28] N. Noël, C. Leclerc, and M. Lee-Gosselin. "Compatibility of Roads for Cyclists in Rural and Urban Fringe Areas." In the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 2003.
[29] DELCAN. "City of Ottawa Road Corridor Planning and Design Guidelines." Ottawa: City Hall, 2008.
[30] City of Calgary. "Pedestrian Policy and Design Report." Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2008.
[31] A. Sutherland and G. Morrish. "Street Design Guidelines." edited by Anna Petersen. Landcom, 2006.
[32] City of Whittlesea. "City of Whittlesea Development Guidelines." Whittlesea: Municipal Policy Direction, 2009.
[33] Narrabrr Shire Council. "New South Wales Development Design Specification Geometric Road Design." New South Wales Narrabrr Shire Council, 2001.
[34] City of Charles Sturt. "Engineering & Open Space Development Guidelines–Road and Path Design Guidelines." Charles Sturt, South Australia, 2009.
[35] C. Heramb. "Street and Site Plan Design Standards." Chicago: Chicago Department of Transportation, 2007.
[36] E. Vanderslice. "Portland Pedestrian Design Guide." Portland: Office of Transportation Engineering and Development, 1998.
[37] Ashland City Council. "Street Standard Handbook." Ashland: Department of community development, 1999.
[38] Access Minneapolis. "Design Guidelines for Streets and Sidewalks." Minneapolis, 2008.
[39] CDOT. "Charlotte’s Urban Street Design Guideline." Charlotte: Charlotte Department of Transportation, 2007.
[40] Pima County. "Subdivision and Development Street Standards." http://www.pimaxpress.com/Dev_Review/PDFs/SubDevStreetStandards .pdf.
[41] City of Aurora. "Aurora Urban Street Standards in Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers." Aurora, 2007.
[42] D. Burden. "Street Design Guidelines for Healthy Neighborhoods." Paper presented at the TRB Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, Texas, 1999.
[43] UTTIPEC. "Pedestrian Design Guidelines." New Delhi: Delhi Development Authority, 2009.
[44] City of New York. "Street Design Manual." New York: Department of Transportation, 2009.
[45] RDM. "Mn/Dot Road Design Manual." Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2010.
[46] City of Tacoma. "Mobility Master Plan Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guidelines." In Tacoma Mobility Master Plan 1. Tacoma, 2009.
[47] Access Minneapolis. "City of Minneapolis Bicycle Facility Manual." City Of Minneapolis: Access Minneapolis, 2009.
[48] N. Jackson, D. Gleason, and B. Gomberg. "Bike Lane Design Guide." Chicago: The Chicago Department of Transportation, 2002.
[49] AASHTO. "Aashto Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Bicycle Facilities." US: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 2010.
[50] O. Arup. "Cycle Infrastructure Design." England, Wales and Scotland: Department for Transport Scottish Executive Welsh Assembly Government, 2008.
[51] TBP. "City of Toronto Bike Plan." Toronto: Toronto Bike Plan, 2001.
[52] B. W. Landis. "Bicycle System Performance Measures." ITE Journal 66, no. 2 (1996): 18–26.
[53] S. Turner, S. Shafer, and W. Stewart. "Bicycle Suitability Criteria for State Roadways in Texas." College Station: Texas Transportation Institute, 1997.
[54] T. A. Petritsch, B.W. Landis, H.F. Huang, P. S. McLeod, D. Lamb, W. Farah, and M. Guttenplan. "Bicycle Level of Service for Arterials.." Transportation Research Record 2031 (2007): 34–42.
[55] NCHRP. "Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets." Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2008.
[56] Z. Asadi-Shekari. "A Non-Motorized Level of Service Method for Evaluating Walking and Cycling Facilities on Urban Streets." Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2013.
[57] FDOT. "Quality/Level of Service." Tallahassee, FL: Department of TransFigportation, 2009.