Geometrical Structure and Layer Orientation Effects on Strength, Material Consumption and Building Time of FDM Rapid Prototyped Samples
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33090
Geometrical Structure and Layer Orientation Effects on Strength, Material Consumption and Building Time of FDM Rapid Prototyped Samples

Authors: Ahmed A. D. Sarhan, Chong Feng Duan, Mum Wai Yip, M. Sayuti

Abstract:

Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies enable physical parts to be produced from various materials without depending on the conventional tooling. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is one of the famous RP processes used at present. Tensile strength and compressive strength resistance will be identified for different sample structures and different layer orientations of ABS rapid prototype solid models. The samples will be fabricated by a FDM rapid prototyping machine in different layer orientations with variations in internal geometrical structure. The 0° orientation where layers were deposited along the length of the samples displayed superior strength and impact resistance over all the other orientations. The anisotropic properties were probably caused by weak interlayer bonding and interlayer porosity.

Keywords: Building orientation, compression strength, rapid prototyping, tensile strength.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107479

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1709

References:


[1] Yao, A. W., & Y.C.Tseng., A robust process optimization for a powder type rapid prototype. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2002, pp. 180-189.
[2] UPcraft, S., & Fletcher, R., The rapid prototyping technologies. Assembly Automation, 2003, pp. 318-330.
[3] D. Dimitrov, K. Schreve, & Beer, N., Advances in three dimensional printing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2006, pp. 136-147.
[4] Comb, J., Priedeman, W., & Turley, P, FDM technology process improvements. Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Austin, University of Texas, 1994, pp. 42-49.
[5] Wamer, M., & Hseih, B., Let's cast a LOM part: A case study of laminated object manufacturing machine. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Rapid Prototyping, Dayton: University of Dayton, 1992, pp. 287-294.
[6] Jacobs, P., Stereolithography and Other RP&M Technologies. Rapid Prototyping to Rapid Tooling. Dearbom, Machigan: SME, 1996.
[7] Z.Y., W., T.l., L., D.L., B., J.J., B., & H.L., M. Direct selective laser sintering of high temperature materials. Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Texas at Austin, 1992, pp. 72-85.
[8] Atzeni, E., Iuliano, L., Minetola, P., & Salmi, A, Redesign and cost estimation of manufactured plastic parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2010, pp. 308-317.
[9] Rangarajan, S., QI, G., Bandyopadhyay, A., Dai, C., Ham, J., Bharagava, P., Danforth, S., The role of materials processing variables in FDC process. Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication symposium, Marcus, 1997, pp. 431-440.
[10] Rietxed, D., Wendel, B., Feulner, R., & Schmachtenberg, E., New thermoplastic powder for selective laser sintering. Kunststoffe International, 2008, pp. 42-45.