Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31231
Analysis of Suitability of Online Assessment by Maintaining Critical Thinking

Authors: Mohamed Chabi, Mohammad Shahid Jamil, Mahmoud I Syam

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to determine whether paper assessment especially in the subject mathematics will ever be completely replaced by online assessment using Learning Management System and Content Management System such as blackboard. Testing students has moved from the traditional scribbling and sketching on paper towards working online on a screen and keyboard. It is found that online assessment by using selective types of questions like multiple choices, true or false and final answer questions don’t reflect the actual understanding of students in solving the problems and teachers can’t determine the weakness points of students. In addition, it is showed that OBMCQs are a very good tool for self-assessment and when teachers are testing for knowledge and facts. But when it comes to the skills, OBMCQs are poor tools for measuring the ability to apply knowledge to complex math problem. 

Keywords: Online Assessment, paper assessment, content management system, learning management system

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107411

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1450

References:


[1] A. M. Pascarella, The influence of web-based homework on quantitative problem-solving in a university physics class paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004 http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/papers/ 204416ProceedingsPaper.pdf (accessed August 2007).
[2] J.E. Bartlett, K.A. Reynolds, M.W. Alexander, A tool for online learning. Journal of Online Learning, 11(3 & 4), 22-24. 2000.
[3] M. Alexander, J.E. Bartlett, A.D. Truell, K. Ouwenga, Testing in a computer technology course: An investigation of equivalency in performance between online and paper and pencil methods. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 18 (1), 69-80. 2001.
[4] M.J. Bresciani, C. L. Zelna,, J. A. Anderson, Assessing Student Learning and Development: A handbook for practitioners. NASPA 2004
[5] Neşet Demirci. a University Students' Perceptions of Web-based vs. Paper-based, Homework in a General Physics Course, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2007, 3(1), 29-34.
[6] S.W. Bonham, D.L. Deardorff, R.J. Beichner, Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college-level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, pp-1050–1071, 2004.