Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31442
Development of Researcher Knowledge in Mathematics Education: Towards a Confluence Framework

Authors: I. Kontorovich, R. Zazkis

Abstract:

We present a framework of researcher knowledge development in conducting a study in mathematics education. The key components of the framework are: knowledge germane to conducting a particular study, processes of knowledge accumulation, and catalyzing filters that influence a researcher decision making. The components of the framework originated from a confluence between constructs and theories in Mathematics Education, Higher Education and Sociology. Drawing on a self-reflective interview with a leading researcher in mathematics education, Professor Michèle Artigue, we illustrate how the framework can be utilized in data analysis. Criteria for framework evaluation are discussed.

Keywords: Community of practice, knowledge development, mathematics education research, researcher knowledge.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100675

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1542

References:


[1] M. N. Fried, and T. Dreyfus, Mathematics and mathematics education: Searching for common ground. New York, London: Springer, 2014.
[2] L. S. Shulman, “Doctoral education shouldn't be a marathon,” The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle Review, April. 2010.
[3] J. Boaler, D. L. Ball, and R. Even, “Preparing researchers for disciplined inquiry: Learning from, in and for practice,” in Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education, vol. 10, A. Bishop and J. Kilpatrick, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2003, pp. 491-521.
[4] M. Y. Van Someren, Y. F. Barnard, and J. A. C. Sandberg, The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press, 1994.
[5] L. E. Burke, E. A. Schlenk, S. M. Sereika, S. M. Cohen, M. B. Happ, and J. S. Dorman, “Developing research competence to support evidence-based practice,” Journal of Professional Nursing, vol. 21, pp. 358-363, Nov.-Dec. 2005.
[6] A. Karp, Leaders in mathematics education: Experience and vision. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher, 2014, ch. 1.
[7] R. C. Bogdan, and S. K. Biklen, Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1998.
[8] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[9] M. Clarke, A. Hyde, and J. Drennan, “Professional identity in High Education,” in The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges, B. M. Kehm and U. Teichler, Eds. London New York: Springer, 2013, pp. 7-21.
[10] R. Leikin, and R. Zazkis, “Teachers’ opportunities to learn mathematics through teaching,” in Learning Through Teaching Mathematics, R. Leikin and R. Zazkis, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 3-21.
[11] M. M. Kennedy, “Knowledge and teaching,” in Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, vol. 8, pp. 355-370, Aug. 2002.
[12] I. Scheffler, Conditions of Knowledge. An introduction to epistimology and education. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Company. 1965.
[13] L. S. Shulman, “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching,” in Educational Researcher, vol. 15, pp. 4-14, Feb. 1986.
[14] D. L. Ball, M. H. Thames, and G. Phelps, “Content knowledge for teaching,” in Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 59, pp. 389-407, Nov. 2008.
[15] F. Gagné, “Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory,” in High Ability Studies, vol. 15, pp. 119-147, Dec. 2004.
[16] A. J. Tannenbaum, “Nature and nurture of giftedness,” in Handbook of Gifted Education, 2nd ed., N. Colangelo and G. Daves, Eds. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2003, pp. 41-53.
[17] P. Liljedahl, “Illumination: an affective experience?,” in ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 45, pp. 253-265, Nov. 2013.
[18] I. Burkitt, C. Husband, J. McKenzie, A. Torn, and S. Crew, Nurse Education and Communities of Practice. London: ENB, 2001.
[19] E. Dubinsky, and M. A. McDonald, “APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research,” in The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI Study, D. Holton, Ed. Dordrechet: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 273-280.